Korean Academic Society of Business Administration
[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 52, No. 1, pp.93-110
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 28 Feb 2023
Received 05 Aug 2022 Accepted 02 Sep 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2023.52.1.93

사립대학 회계감리에 따른 감사보수 및 감사시간의 관계

Kyung-Min Kim ; Jeong-Un Choi
(First Author) Korea Advancing Schools Foundation kmkim@kasfo.or.kr
(Corresponding Author) Daegu University Jaychoi@daegu.ac.kr
The Relationship between Audit Review of Private University and Audit Fee and Audit Hour


Copyright 2011 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This study is to investigate audit fee and hour of private universities in order to measure the effectiveness of audit review.

After audit review, there is a possibility that the auditors who audited the private universities and universities will be disadvantaged, which will put pressure on the auditing work. Therefore, audit review is highly likely to change the behavior of private universities and auditors. In this study, we examine ① audit fee and hour of audit reviewed universities(AR), ② audit fee and hour of AR after review, ③ the difference of audit fee and hour between AR and non-AR.

As a result, AR target year's audit fee and hour is lower than non-AR, significantly. And AR's audit fee after review is significant higher, but not significant relative to non-AR. Additionally, AR's audit hour after review is significant lower than non-AR. This study has the contribution in that it investigated AR's audit fee and hour about the effectiveness of audit review in private universities. In addition, this study suggests the Standard audit hour policy for effectiveness of the private university audit review, that is, increase the accounting transparency of private universities and improve audit quality.

Keywords:

Private university, Audit review, Audit quality, Audit fee, Audit hour, Standard audit hour policy

Acknowledgments

The author Jeong-Un Choi was supported by Daegu University Research Fund in 2022.

References

  • Bannister, J. and D. Wiest(2001), “Earnings Management and Auditor Conservatism: Effects of SEC Enforcement Actions,” Managerial Finance, 27(12), pp.57-71. [https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350110767448]
  • Beattie, V., S. Fearnley, and R. Brandt(2004), “A Grounded Theory Model of Auditor-Client Negotiations,” International Journal of Auditing, 8(1), pp.1-19. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2004.00225.x]
  • Beneish, M. D.(1999), “The Detection of Earning Manipulation,” Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5), pp.24-36. [https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n5.2296]
  • Caramanis, C. and C. Lennox(2008), “Audit Effort and Earnings Management,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(1), pp.116-138. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.05.002]
  • Chang, C. and Chou, L.(2009), “Can Individual CPA Sanction Improve Audit Quality of the Firm?,” American Accounting Association, Annual Conference.
  • Choi, K. and Choe, K.(2003), “An Analysis of the Corporate Characteristics of Companies Reporting Aggressive Accounting,” Korean Accounting Review, 28(2), pp.211-245.
  • Choi, S. Y., Roh, H. C. and Park, J. H.(2021), “Audit Review and the Change of Audit Quality,” Journal of Taxation and Accounting, 22(2), pp.133-160 [https://doi.org/10.35850/KJTA.22.2.5]
  • Choi, J. U., Lee, J. E., and BAE, G. S.(2014). “Audit Fees and Audit Hours of Audit Reviewed Firms,” Korean Accounting Review, 39(1), pp.217-253.
  • Chung, M. J.(2004), “on improving accounting transparency with emphasis auditing and audit review,” Korean Accounting Journal, 13(2), pp.53-88.
  • Craswell, A. T., and J. Francis(1999), “Pricing of Initial Audit Engagements,” The Accounting Review, 74(April), pp.201-216. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.1999.74.2.201]
  • DeAngelo, L.(1981), “Auditor size and audit quality,” Journal of Accounting and Economics (December), pp.133-199. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1]
  • Dechow. P., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney(1996), “Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), pp.1-36. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00489.x]
  • DeFond, M. and J. Zhang(2014), “A review of archival auditing research” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), pp.275-326. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002]
  • Deis, D. R. and G. Giroux(1996), “The Effect of Auditor Changes on Audit Fees, Audit Hours, and Audit Quality,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 15(1), pp.55-76. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(95)00041-0]
  • Feroz, E., K. Pake, and V. Pastena(1991), “The Financial and Market Effect of the SEC's Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases,” Journal of Accounting Research, 29, pp.107-142. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2491006]
  • Hilary, G. and C. Lennox(2005), “The Credibility of Self-Regulation: Evidence from the Accounting Profession's Peer Review Program,” Journal of Accounting Economics, 40(1), pp.211-229. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.03.002]
  • Jeong, T, B.(2008), “A Study on the Effectiveness of Measures Taken Against the Company After Supervision of Audit Report in Korea,” Korean Accounting Journal, 17(3), pp.323-352.
  • Kang, S. M. and Hwang, I. T.(2016), “External Auditing and Audit Review in Private Universities,” Korea Accounting Information Association, 34(1), pp.1-34
  • Kim, M. T.(2011), “A Study on Earnings Management and Abnormal Earning Numbers for the Enforced Firms,” Korea International Accounting Review(38), pp.1-22. [https://doi.org/10.21073/kiar.2011..38.001]
  • Kim, S. H., Lee, N. J., and Lee, J. W.(2007), “Earnings Management and Market Responses of the FSS Sanctioned Firms Before and After the Audit Review,” Study on Accounting, Taxation & Auditing(46), pp.309-339.
  • Kim, K. M. and Choi, J. U.(2021), “A Study on the Asymmetric Cost Behavior of Private Universities,” Korean Accounting Journal, 30(4), pp.123-156. [https://doi.org/10.24056/KAJ.2021.07.003]
  • Kim, K. M. and Choi, J. U.(2022), “Analysis of Industry Specialization, Audit Fee and Audit Hour of Private University External Auditors,” Study on Accounting, Taxation & Auditing, 64(2), pp.103-125.
  • Kwon, S. Y., Kim, M. C., and Jung, T. J.(2005), “The Effects of Audit Hours and Audit Quality on Audit Fees,” Korean Accounting Review, 30(4), pp.51-76.
  • Lee, S. H.(2009), “The Audit Quality on Companies Reporting Aggressive Accounting with Emphasis on Audit Fee and Audit Hour,” Journal of Finance and Accounting Information, 9(3), pp.123-156.
  • Walker, P. L. and J. R. Casterella(2000), “The Role of Auditee Profitability in Pricing New Audit Engagements,” A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19(Spring), pp.157-167. [https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2000.19.1.157]

∙ The author Kyung-Min Kim is currently serving as an expert member of the Korea Advancing Schools Foundation. His main research areas are accounting for non-profit organizations, private universities, audit quality, and education costs.

∙ The author Jeong-Un Choi is an associate professor at College of Business Daegu University. His research focuses on the accounting quality and corporate governance.