Journal Archive

korean management review - Vol. 49 , No. 1

[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 49, No. 1, pp.103-128
Abbreviation: kmr
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 29 Feb 2020
Received 25 Jan 2019 Revised 22 Nov 2019 Accepted 02 Dec 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2020.49.1.103

Social Capital and Brand Prominence in Luxury Products
Yong Seok Sohn* ; Kun Woo Yoo**
*Professor of Marketing, School of Management, Kyung Hee University, First Author
**Lecturer, School of Management, Kyung Hee University, Corresponding Author

사회적 자본과 브랜드 현저성에 관한 연구: 럭셔리 제품을 중심으로
손용석* ; 유건우**
*(주저자) 경희대학교 (ysohn@khu.ac.kr)
**(교신저자) 경희대학교 (yukw@khu.ac.kr)
Funding Information ▼

Abstract

In previous studies of brand prominence in luxury products, the wealth of consumers has been a dominant concern. These days, however, as the era of social networking allows us to browse and connect with others simply with the tips of our fingers, and this ability has become more vital over time, not only wealth but also social capital has gained more of an impact on the salience of luxury brands, the size of a brand’s mark or logo on a product. This paper looks closely into the concept of social capital, trying to identify brand prominence and investigate its relationship to social capital. As a result, participants of bridging social capital (bridgers) respond more favorably to a prominent logo, a logo that displays the message that I am definitely wearing Louis Vuitton, than those of bonding social capital (bonders). When social capital is engaged with motivation and goal, consumer preference for brand prominence is more elaborate such that bridgers pursue a utilitarian purpose as an identity agent for status. In the same vein, those bridgers will be more cognitively depleted than bonders, which renders them succumb to temptations of purchasing luxuries with brand prominence. The mediating role of the cognitive depletion is discussed. Furthermore, we examine the phenomenon of the growing proportion of bridgers in the Asian market of SNS (social network service). Finally, the findings and managerial implications are reported.

초록

본 연구는 소비자를 둘러싼 사회적 자본에 따라 럭셔리 제품의 브랜드 현저성이 갖는 의미는 다를 것이라 예상하였다. 구체적으로 소비자가 럭셔리 제품을 구매할 때 고려하는 결속적 혹은 연결적 사회적 자본에 따라 브랜드 현저성이 높은 럭셔리 제품과 브랜드 현저성이 낮은 럭셔리 제품의 구매의도에 차이가 있는지 살펴보고, 이러한 차이가 발생하게 된 심리적 프로세스에 대해 살펴보고자 하였다.

연구결과, 연결적 사회자본의 소비자는 결속적 사회자본의 소비자보다 브랜드 현저성이 높은 럭셔리 제품에 대해 실용적 가치를 지각하여 구매하는 것으로 나타났다. 이때, 지각된 실용적 가치가 조절자원을 고갈시키는 순차적 매개효과가 관찰되었다. 반면에 결속적 사회자본의 소비자는 연결적 사회자본의 소비자보다 브랜드 현저성이 낮은 럭셔리 제품에 대해 쾌락적 가치를 지각하여 구매하는 것으로 나타났으나, 쾌락적 가치가 조절자원을 고갈시키는 순차적 매개효과는 발생하지 않았다. 본 연구결과를 토대로 럭셔리 제품 구매에 대한 이론적, 실무적 시사점을 제공하였다.


Keywords: social capital, brand prominence, luxury products, utilitarian value, hedonic value, depletion
키워드: 사회적 자본, 브랜드 현저성, 럭셔리 제품, 실용적 가치, 쾌락적 가치, 조절자원

Acknowledgments

이 논문은 2017년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2017S1A5A2A01025544)This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017S1A5A2A01025544)


References
1. 한국갤럽(2015). 한국인이 좋아하는 브랜드 (2004-2014).
2. Amaldoss, W. and S. Jain (2008), “Research Note—Trading Up: A Strategic Analysis of Reference Group Effects,” Marketing Science, 27(5), pp.932-942.
3. Babin, B. J., W. R. Darden, and M. Griffin (1994), “Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), pp.644-656.
4. Batra, R. and O. T. Ahtola (1991), “Measuring The Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes,” Marketing Letters, 2(2), pp. 159-170.
5. Baumeister, R. F. (2002), “Yielding to Temptation: Self-control Failure, Impulsive Purchasing, and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), pp.670-676.
6. Bearden, W. O. and M. J. Etzel (1982), “Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), pp.183-194.
7. Blackhart, G. C., J. Williamson, and L. Nelson (2015), “Social Anxiety in Relation to Selfcontrol Depletion Following Social Interactions,” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34(9), pp.747-773.
8. Botti, S. and A. L. McGill (2010), “The Locus of Choice: Personal Causality and Satisfaction with Hedonic and Utilitarian Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), pp. 1065-1078.
9. Bourdieu, P. (1985), The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education: pp.241-258. New York: Greenwood.
10. Cheema, A. and V. M. Patrick (2012), “Influence of Warm versus Cool Temperatures on Consumer Choice: A Resource Depletion Account,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), pp. 984-995.
11. Ellison, N. B., C. Steinfield, and C. Lampe (2007), “The Benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), pp.1143-1168.
12. Geiger-Oneto, S., B. D. Gelb, D. Walker, and J. D. Hess (2013), ““Buying Status” by Choosing or Rejecting Luxury Brands and Their Counterfeits,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(3), pp.357-372.
13. Gittell, R. and A. Vidal (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. Sage publications.
14. Hagtvedt, H. and V. M. Patrick (2009), “The Broad Embrace of Luxury: Hedonic Potential as a Driver of Brand Extendibility,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(4), pp.608-618.
15. Han, Y. J., J. C. Nunes, and X. Drèze (2010), “Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence,” Journal of Marketing, 74(4), pp.15-30.
16. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, Guilford Press.
17. Kasser, T. and R. M. Ryan (1996), “Further Examining The American Dream: Differential Correlates of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Goals,” Personality and social psychology bulletin, 22(3), pp. 280-287.
18. Kauppinen-Räisänen, H., P. Björk, A. Lönnström, and M. N. Jauffret (2018), “How Consumers' Need for Uniqueness, Self-monitoring, and Social Identity Affect Their Choices When Luxury Brands Visually Shout versus Whisper,” Journal of Business Research, 84, pp.72-81.
19. Khan, U. and R. Dhar (2006), “Licensing Effect in Consumer Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), pp.259-266.
20. Kim, J. C., B. Park, and D. Dubois (2018), “How Consumers’ Political Ideology and Status-Maintenance Goals Interact to Shape Their Desire for Luxury Goods,” Journal of Marketing, 82(6), pp.132-149.
21. Kivetz, R., and I. Simonson (2002), “Earning The Right to Indulge: Effort as a Determinant of Customer Preferences toward Frequency Program Rewards,” Journal of Marketing Research, 39(2), pp.155-170.
22. Laran, J. and C. Janiszewski (2010), “Work or Fun? How Task Construal and Completion Influence Regulatory Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), pp.967-983.
23. Lee, J., E. Ko, and C. M. Megehee (2015), “Social Benefits of Brand Logos in Presentation of Self in Cross and Same Gender Influence Contexts,” Journal of Business Research, 68(6), pp.1341-1349.
24. Lin, N. (1999), “Building a Network Theory of Social Capital,” Connections, 22(1), pp.28-51.
25. Monkhouse, L. L., B. R Barnes, and U. Stephan (2012), “The Influence of Face and Group Orientation on The Perception of Luxury Goods: A Four Market Study of East Asian Consumers,” International Marketing Review, 29(6), pp.647-672.
26. Novak, T. P., D. L. Hoffman, and A. Duhachek (2003), “The Influence of Goal‐directed and Experiential Activities on Online Flow Experiences,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1-2), pp.3-16.
27. Ordabayeva, N. and D. Fernandes (2018), “Better or Different? How Political Ideology Shapes Preferences for Differentiation in The Social Hierarchy,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45(2), pp.227–250.
28. Phua, J., S. V. Jin, J. J. Kim (2017), “Uses and Gratifications of Social Networking Sites for Bridging and Bonding Social Capital: A Comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat,” Computers in Human Behavior, 72, pp.115-122.
29. Pocheptsova, A., O. Amir, R. Dhar, and R. F. Baumeister (2009), “Deciding without Resources: Resource Depletion and Choice in Context,” Journal of Marketing Research, 46(3), pp.344-355.
30. Portes, A. (1998), “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology,” Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), pp.1-24.
31. Putnam, R. D. (2000), Bowling alone, New York: Simon and Schuster.
32. Shiv, B. and A. Fedorikhin (1999), “Heart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), pp. 278-292.
33. Spencer, M. E. (1977), “History and Sociology: An Analysis of Weber's The City,” Sociology, 11(3), pp.507-525.
34. Subrahmanyam, K., S. M. Reich, N. Waechter, and G. Espinoza (2008), “Online and Offline Social Networks: Use of Social Networking Sites by Emerging Adults,” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), pp.420-433.
35. Vohs, K. D., R. F. Baumeister, and N. J. Ciarocco (2005), “Self-regulation and Self-presentation: Regulatory Resource Depletion Impairs Impression Management and Effortful Selfpresentation Depletes Regulatory Resources,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), pp.632-657.
36. Vohs, K. D. and R. J. Faber (2007), “Spent Resources: Self-regulatory Resource Availability Affects Impulse Buying,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), pp.537-547.
37. Voss, K. E., E. R. Spangenberg, and B. Grohmann (2003), “Measuring The Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude,” Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), pp. 310-320.
38. Watson, D., L. A. Clark, and A. Tellegen (1988), “Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), pp.1063-1070.
39. White, K. and D. W. Dahl (2007), “Are All Outgroups Created Equal? Consumer Identity and Dissociative Influence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), pp.525-536.
40. Wiedmann, K. P., N. Hennigs, and A. Siebels (2009), “Value‐based Segmentation of Luxury Consumption Behavior,” Psychology & Marketing, 26(7), pp.625-651.
41. Wilcox, K., H. M. Kim, and S. Sen (2009), “Why Do Consumers Buy Counterfeit Luxury Brands?” Journal of Marketing Research, 46(2), pp. 247-259.
42. Williams, D. (2006), “On and Off the ’Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era,” Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11 (2), pp.593-628.
43. Wong, N. Y., and A. C. Ahuvia (1998), “Personal Taste and Family Face: Luxury Consumption in Confucian and Western Societies,” Psychology & Marketing, 15(5), pp.423-441.
44. Zhang, Y. and L. J. Shrum (2008), “The Influence of Self-construal on Impulsive Consumption,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), pp. 838-850.

• 저자 손용석은 현재 경희대학교 경영대학 마케팅 전공 교수로 재직 중이다. 한국외국어대학교 경제학과를 졸업하였으며, New York 대학교에서 경영학 석사 및 박사를 취득하였다. 주요연구분야는 혁신, 브랜딩 및 소비자 행동 등이다.

• 저자 유건우는 현재 경희대학교 경영학과 시간강사로 재직 중이다. 경희대학교 법과대학을 졸업하였으며, 경희대학교에서 경영학 석사와 박사를 취득하였다. 주요 연구분야는 소비자행동, 실험디자인 및 방법론 개발 등이다.