About This Journal

korean management review - Vol. 54, No. 3

[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 581-600
Abbreviation: kmr
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Jun 2025
Received 03 Dec 2024 Revised 05 Feb 2025 Accepted 17 Mar 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2025.54.3.581

Presenteeism Among Careerists: A Problem and a Possible Solution
Dae-seok Kang ; Minjeong Jo ; Ilsoo Kim
(First Author, Corresponding Author) Inha University, Ccollege of Business of Administration (kang0180@inha.ac.kr)
(Co-Author) Inha University, Ccollege of Business of Administration (eileen3@snu.ac.kr)
(Co-Author) SABIC (Il-Soo.Kim@sabic.com)

출세주의자들의 프리젠티즘 현상: 그 부작용과 처방책
강대석 ; 조민정 ; 김일수
(주저자, 교신저자) 인하대학교 경영대학
(공저자) 인하대학교 경영대학
(공저자) SABIC

Copyright 2025 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Funding Information ▼

Abstract

Extreme careerism has become increasingly prevalent in modern workplaces, posing a challenge to the sustainable development and long-term survival of organizations. Guided by Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, this study investigates how careerism contributes to work alienation and presenteeism. It proposes a moderated mediation model in which work alienation mediates the relationship between careerism and presenteeism. Additionally, it explores how perceived motivational climate—specifically mastery and performance climates—moderates this relationship. The study collected data from 330 employees across public and private sectors in the Seoul metropolitan area, using convenience sampling. Hayes’s PROCESS macro was used to test the proposed model. Results show that work alienation fully mediates the effect of careerism on presenteeism. Notably, mastery climate strengthens the indirect effect of careerism on presenteeism through work alienation—contrary to initial expectations. By identifying key psychological mechanisms that exacerbate presenteeism, this study offers practical recommendations to reduce productivity loss. It also broadens the theoretical understanding of destructive workplace behaviors and contributes to future research on career-driven organizational dynamics.

초록

과도한 직장내 커리어리즘이 더욱 뚜렷해지고 있는 가운데 이것은 사실상 조직의 지속 가능한 발전이나 생존과도 직결된다. 본 연구는 자원보존이론의 관점에서 출세주의자들의 이러한 이기심은 업무소외와 프리젠티즘을 자초한다고 가정한다. 우리의 조절된 매개 모형은 업무소외의 매개를 통해 커리어리즘이 프리젠티즘에 어떻게 영향을 미치는지, 아울러 지각된 모티베이션 분위기(숙련지향 및 성과지향)는 프리젠티즘에 대한 업무소외의 효과를 어떻게 조절하는지 보여준다. 연구 결과들은 민간 및 공공 분야의 다양한 직업군에서 330명의 응답자가 작성한 설문지로 수집한 데이터를 바탕으로 한다. 서울 수도권에서 편의 샘플링을 통해 데이터를 획득했다. 연구모형은 Hayes의 프로세스(process) 절차를 따라 분석되었다. 업무소외는 독립변인과 종속변인의 관계를 완전매개하는 것으로 밝혀졌으며, 두 모티베이션 분위기 중 숙련지향 분위기에서 업무소외를 통한 간접효과가 기대와 달리 반대 방향으로 조절되었는데, 숙련지향이 높게 지각될 때 그 효과가 더 강하게 나타났다. 연구자들은 종업원 프리젠티즘을 유발하는 변인의 규명을 통해 이러한 생산성 손실을 줄이기 위한 제언과 더불어 파괴 행동에 관한 연구 범위를 확대하여 관련 연구의 이론적 근거도 제공하고자 했다.


Keywords: Careerism, Work Alienation, Presenteeism, Motivational Climates, Mastery climate, Performance climate
키워드: 커리어리즘, 업무소외, 프리젠티즘, 모티베이션 분위기

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2024S1A5A2A01021500).


References
1. 유선욱(2023), “밀레니얼 세대의 이직: 커뮤니케이션 실무자들의 직무 요구·자원, 번아웃과 직무열의의 영향력을 중심으로,” 한국광고홍보학보, 제25권 4호, pp.37-77.
You, S.(2023), “Turnover among Millennial Practitioners : A Study on the Effects of Job Demands, Resources, Burnout, and Job Engagement on Turnover Intentions of Communication Practitioners,” The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 25(4), pp.37-77.
2. 전병윤, 정진철(2017), “프리젠티즘의 연구 동향 분석과 실무적 시사점,” 경영경제연구, 제39권 2호, pp.93-134.
Chun, B. Y. and Jung, J. C.(2017), “Presenteeism : Research Trends Analysis and Future Practical Suggestions,” Journal of Business and Economic Research, 39(2), pp.93-134.
3. 변동현, 장승권(2020), “사회적경제조직의 멘토링: 밀레니얼세대 직원활동가의 조직적응에 대한 내러티브연구,” 사회적기업연구, 제13권 2호, pp.33-62.
Byun, D. and Jang, S.(2020), “Mentoring in Social Economy Organizations: A Narrative Study of Organizational Adjustment of Millennial Full-time Paid Activists,” Social Enterprise Studies, 13(2), pp.33-62.
4. Amarat, M., M. Akbolat, Ö. Ünal, and B. Güneş Karakaya(2019), “The Mediating Role of Work Alienation in the Effect of Workplace Loneliness on Nurses’ Performance,” Journal of Nursing Management, 27(3), pp.553-559.
5. Ames, C. and J. Archer(1988), “Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Students’ Learning Strategies and Motivation Processes,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), pp.260-267.
6. Ames, C.(1992), “Classrooms: Goals, Structures, and Student Motivation,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), pp.261-271.
7. Aryee, S. and Z. X. Chen(2004), “Countering the Trend towards Careerist Orientation in the Age of Downsizing: Test of a Social Exchange Model,” Journal of Business Research, 57(4), pp.321-328.
8. Balaguer, I., I. Castillo, J. L. Duda, E. Quested, and V. Morales(2011), “Social-contextual and Motivational Predictors of Intentions to Continue Participation: A Test of SDT in Dance,” RICYDE: Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 7(25), pp.305-319.
9. Bierla, I., B. Huver, and S. Richard(2013), “New Evidence on Absenteeism and Presenteeism,” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(7), pp.1536-1550.
10. Biron, M. and P. Bamberger(2012), “Aversive Workplace Conditions and Absenteeism: Taking Referent Group Norms and Supervisor Support into Account,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), pp.901-912.
11. Brender-Ilan, Y. A. E. L.(2012), “How do income and its components and perception relate to alienation?,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(2), pp.440-470.
12. Burton, W. N., C. Y. Chen, X. Li, A. B. Schultz, and H. Abrahamsson(2014), “The Association of Self-reported Employee Physical Activity with Metabolic Syndrome, Health Care Costs, Absenteeism, and Presenteeism,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56(9), pp.919-926.
13. Chay, Y. W. and S. Aryee(1999), “Potential Moderating Influence of Career Growth Opportunities on Careerist Orientation and Work Attitudes: Evidence of the Protean Career era in Singapore,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(5), pp.613-623.
14. Cheng, G. H. L. and D. K. S. Chan(2008), “Who Suffers More from Job Insecurity? A Meta-Analytic Review,” Applied Psychology, 57(2), pp.272-303.
15. Chiaburu, D. S., I. Diaz, and A. De Vos(2013a), “Employee Alienation: Relationships with Careerism and Career Satisfaction,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(1), pp.4-20.
16. Chiaburu, D. S., G. J. Muñoz, and R. G. Gardner (2013b), “How to Spot a Careerist Early on: Psychopathy and Exchange Ideology as Predictors of Careerism,” Journal of Business Ethics, 118, pp.473-486.
17. Christina, G. L., C. G. L. Nerstad, G. C. Roberts, and A. M. Richardsen(2013), “Achieving Success at Work: The Development and Validation of the Motivational Climate at Work Questionnaire (MCWQ),” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(11), pp.2231-2250.
18. Chung, Y. W.(2018), “Workplace ostracism and workplace behaviors: A moderated mediation model of perceived stress and psychological empowerment,” Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 31(3), pp.304-317.
19. Cooper, C. L. and L. Lu(2016), “Presenteeism as a Global Phenomenon: Unraveling the Psychosocial Mechanisms from the Perspective of Social Cognitive Theory,” Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23(2), pp.216-231.
20. Cremer, D. and T. R. Tyler(2005), “Am I Respected or Not?: Inclusion and Reputation as Issues in Group Membership,” Social Justice Research, 18, pp.121-153.
21. D’Abate, C. P. and E. R. Eddy(2007), “Engaging in Personal Business on the Job: Extending the Presenteeism Construct,” Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18(3), pp.361-383.
22. Deloitte(2019), The Deloitte Global Millennial Survey 2019, Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/About-Deloitte/deloitte-2019-millennial-survey.pdf
23. Enders, C. K. and D. Tofighi(2007), “Centering Predictor Variables in Cross-sectional Multilevel Models: A New Look at an Old Issue,” Psychological Methods, 12(2), pp.121-138.
24. Fedi, A., L. Pucci, S. Tartaglia, and C. Rollero(2016), “Correlates of Work-alienation and Positive Job Attitudes in High- and Low-status Workers,” Career Development International, 21(7), pp.713-725.
25. Feldman, D. C. and B. A. Weitz(1991), “From the Invisible Hand to the Gladhand: Understanding a Careerist Orientation to Work,” Human Resource Management, 30(2), pp.237-257.
26. Feldman, D. C.(1985), “The New Careerism: Origins, Tenets, and Consequences,” The Industrial Psychologist, 22(1), pp.39-44.
27. Feldman, D. C., C. R. Leana, and M. C. Bolino(2002), “Underemployment and Relative Deprivation among Re-ennployed Executives,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(4), pp.453-471.
28. Forbes(2009, January 27), “When should you call in sick?” Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/2009/01/27/sick-work-job-leadership-careers_0127_business_basics.html
29. Hayes, A. F.(2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach (2nd ed.), Guilford Press, New York.
30. Hirschfeld, R. R., H. S. Feild, and A. G. Bedeian(2000), “Work Alienation as an Individual Difference Construct for Predicting Workplace Adjustment: A Test in Two Samples,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(9), pp.1880-1902.
31. Hobfoll, S. E.(1989), “Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress,” American Psychologist, 44(3), pp.513-524.
32. Hsiung, H. H., C. W. Lin, and C. S. Lin(2012), “Nourishing or Suppressing? The Contradictory Influences of Perception of Organizational Politics on Organizational Citizenship Behaviour,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(2), pp.258-276.
33. Johns, G.(2010), “Presenteeism in the Workplace: A Review and Research Agenda,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), pp.519-542.
34. Kanungo, R.(1982), Work alienation: An integrative approach, Praeger, New York.
35. Karanika-Murray, M. and C. Biron(2020), “The Health-performance Framework of Presenteeism : Towards Understanding an Adaptive Behaviour,” Human Relations, 73(2), pp.242-261.
36. Kilduff, G. J., H. A. Elfenbein, and B. M. Staw(2010), “The Psychology of Rivalry: A Relationally Dependent Analysis of Competition,” Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), pp.943-969.
37. Klotz, A. C. and M. C. Bolino(2022), “When Quiet Quitting is Worse than the Real Thing,” Harvard Business Review, pp.1-5.
38. Knani, M., P. S. Fournier, and C. Biron(2018), “Psychosocial Risks, Burnout and Intention to Quit Following the Introduction of New Software at Work,” Work, 60(1), pp.95-104.
39. Li, S., & Chen, Y.(2018), “The relationship between psychological contract breach and employees’ counterproductive work behaviors: the mediating effect of organizational cynicism and work alienation,” Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1273.
40. Lohaus, D. and W. Habermann(2019), “Presenteeism : A Review and Research Directions,” Human Resource Management Review, 29(1), pp.43-58.
41. Lohaus, D., W. Habermann, I. El Kertoubi, and F. Röser(2021), “Working While Ill is not Always Bad—Positive Effects of Presenteeism,” Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 620918.
42. Lu, L., H. Y. Lin, and C. L. Cooper(2013), “Unhealthy and Present: Motives and Consequences of the Act of Presenteeism among Taiwanese Employees,” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(4), pp.406-416.
43. McGregor, A., C. A. Magee, P. Caputi, and D. Iverson(2016), “A Job Demands-resources Approach to Presenteeism,” Career Development International, 21(4), pp.402-418.
44. Mehta, P.(2022), “Work Alienation as a Mediator between Work from Home-related Isolation, Loss of Task Identity and Job Insecurity Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic,” International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 15(3), pp.287-306.
45. Miraglia, M. and G. Johns(2016), “Going to Work Ill: A Meta-analysis of the Correlates of Presenteeism and a Dual-path Model,” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(3), pp.261-283.
46. Nair, N. and N. Vohra(2010), “An Exploration of Factors Predicting Work Alienation of Knowledge Workers,” Management Decision, 48(4), pp.600-615.
47. Nerstad, C. G., G. C. Roberts, and A. M. Richardsen(2013), “Achieving Success at Work: Development and Validation of the Motivational Climate at Work Questionnaire (MCWQ),” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(11), pp.2231-2250.
48. Ntoumanis, N. and S. J. H. Biddle(1999), “A Review of Motivational Climate in Physical Activity,” Journal of Sport Sciences, 17(8), pp.643-665.
49. Nunnally, J. C., and I. H. Bernstein(1994), Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.
50. Patel, C., M. Biron, S. C. Cooper, and P. S. Budhwar(2023), “Sick and Working: Current Challenges and Emerging Directions for Future Presenteeism Research,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(6), pp.839-852.
51. Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff(2003), “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), pp.879-903.
52. Rogerson, P. A.(2001), Statistical Methods for Geography, Sage, London.
53. Rosen, C. C., D. J. Slater, C. Chang, and R. E. Johnson(2013), “Let's Make a Deal: Development and Validation of the Ex Post I-Deals Scale,” Journal of Management, 39(3), pp.709-742.
54. Rousseau, D. M.(1990), “New Hire Perceptions of their own and their Employer’s Obligations: A Study of Psychological Contracts,“ Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(5), pp.389-400.
55. Sackett, P. R.(2002), “The Structure of Counterproductive Work Behaviors: Dimensionality and Relationships with Facets of Job Performance,” International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1-2), pp.5-11.
56. Seeman, P.(1972), “The Membrane Actions of Anesthetics and Tranquilizers,” Pharmacological Reviews, 24(4), pp.583-655.
57. Treasure, D. C.(1997), “Perceptions of the Motivational Climate and Elementary School Children’s Cognitive and Affective Response,” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19(3), pp.278-290.
58. Turpin, R. S., R. J. Ozminkowski, C. E. Sharda, J. J. Collins, M. L. Berger, G. M. Billotti, and S. Nicholson(2004), “Reliability and Validity of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46(11), pp.1123-1133.
59. Vazou, S., N. Ntoumanis, and J. L. Duda(2005), “Peer Motivational Climate in Youth Sport: A Qualitative Inquiry,” Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6(5), pp.497-516.
60. Yamashita, M. and M. Arakida(2008), “Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale in Female Employees at 2 Japanese Enterprises,” Journal of Occupational Health, 50(1), pp.66−69.
61. Zhou, Q., L. F. Martinez, A. I. Ferreira, and P. Rodrigues(2016), Supervisor Support, Role Ambiguity and Productivity Associated with Presenteeism: A Longitudinal Study,” Journal of Business Research, 69(9), pp.3380-3387.

∙ 저자 강대석은 현재 인하대학교에서 경영대학 교수로 재직 중이다. 미국 미네소타대학교에서 인적자원개발 전공으로 박사를 취득했다. 주요 연구 분야는 리더십 및 커리어 개발, 심리적 특권의식, 직장 내 왕따 등이다.

∙ 저자 조민정은 현재 인하대학교 경영대학 강사로 재직 중이다. 서울대학교에서 인사조직 전공으로 경영학 석사 및 박사 학위를 취득했다. 주요 연구 분야는 전략적 인적자원관리, 인사 역량, 리더십 및 다양성 관리 등이다.

∙ 저자 김일수는 현재 사우디의 화학제조기업 SABIC에서 상무로 재직 중이다. 인하대학교에서 인사관리 전공으로 박사를 취득했다. 주요 연구 분야는 커리어리즘, 프리젠티즘, 사회적 자본 등이다.