Current Issue

korean management review - Vol. 55, No. 1

[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 1459-1483
Abbreviation: kmr
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2025
Received 30 Sep 2025 Revised 05 Nov 2025 Accepted 25 Nov 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2025.54.6.1459

Exploring Academia Research Gaps in Management Studies on Artificial Intelligence: An Industry-Based Comparative Analysis
Minbeom Yoon ; Jaehui Kim ; Hee-Woong Kim
(First Author) Master's Student, Graduate School of Information, Yonsei University, Korea (minbeom_y@yonsei.ac.kr)
(Co-Author) Ph.D. Student, Graduate School of Information, Yonsei University, Korea (keemjaehee@yonsei.ac.kr)
(Corresponding Author) Professor, Graduate School of Information, Yonsei University, Korea (kimhw@yonsei.ac.kr)

경영학계 AI 학술 연구의 공백 탐색: 산업 트렌드 기반 비교 분석
윤민범 ; 김재희 ; 김희웅
(주저자) 연세대학교 정보대학원 석사과정
(공저자) 연세대학교 정보대학원 박사과정
(교신저자) 연세대학교 정보대학원 교수

Copyright 2025 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Funding Information ▼

Abstract

This study aims to explore research gaps and suggest future research directions in the field of business administration by comparatively analyzing artificial intelligence (AI) research topics in industry and academia. For this purpose, the analysis subjects include 14,032 AI-related industry articles collected from January 2020 to May 2025, and 1,130 AI-related abstracts selected from 26,086 business administration paper abstracts from the same period. BERTopic-based topic modeling and keyword co-occurrence network analysis were employed as analytical methods. The analysis results revealed, first, that a comparison of topics via BERTopic identified key industry-focused topics that have been relatively overlooked in business administration academia. Second, the keyword co-occurrence network analysis showed that the industry exhibits a hub-and-spoke structure centered on ‘AI’, whereas academia displays a polycentric structure, interpreted as a characteristic of an early research stage. This study proposes specific future research themes for the business administration field by connecting these derived industry-focused topics with the 9 detailed tracks of the Korean Management Review (published by the Korean Academic Society of Business Administration). This research is significant as it empirically analyzes the gap between academia and industry and suggests practical and academic directions for the expansion of AI research in business administration.

초록

본 연구는 산업계와 경영학계에서 다루는 인공지능(AI) 연구 주제를 비교 분석하여, 경영학 분야의 연구 공백을 탐색하고 향후 연구 방향을 제시하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 2020년 1월부터 2025년 5월까지 수집된 AI 관련 산업 기사 14,032건과, 동 기간 경영학 논문 26,086편의 초록 중 AI 관련 초록 1,130편을 분석 대상으로 삼았다. 연구 방법으로는 BERTopic 기반 토픽모델링과 키워드 공출현 네트워크 분석을 활용하였다. 분석 결과, 첫째, BERTopic 토픽 비교를 통해 경영학계에서 상대적으로 주목하지 않았던 산업계 중심의 주요 토픽들을 식별하였다. 둘째, 키워드 공출현 네트워크 분석에서 산업계는 ‘AI’를 중심으로 한 허브 앤 스포크(Hub-and-Spoke)형 구조를 보인 반면, 경영학계는 여러 주제가 분산된 다중심적(Polycentric) 구조를 나타내며 이는 초기 연구 단계의 특성으로 해석되었다. 본 연구는 이렇게 도출된 산업계 중심 토픽을 한국경영학회 ‘경영학연구’의 9개 세부 트랙과 연결하여, 경영학 분야의 구체적인 미래 연구 주제를 제안한다. 본 연구는 학계와 산업계 간의 간극을 실증적으로 분석하고 경영학 AI 연구의 실무적·학문적 확장 방향을 제시한다는 점에서 의의가 있다.


Keywords: AI, Keyword Co-occurrence Network Analysis, BERTopic, Industry-Specific Topics
키워드: 키워드 공출현 네트워크 분석, 산업 중심 토픽

Acknowledgments

이 논문은 2023년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 공동연구지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2023S1A5A2A03084147).


References
1. 김영욱. “업무 특화형 AI의 부상: 범용 AI를 넘어선 새로운 혁신,” Samsung SDS 인사이트 리포트, https://www.samsungsds.com/kr/insights/the-rise-of-business-specific-artificial-intelligence.html, 2025년 9월 접속.
Kim, Y. W. “The Rise of Task-Specific AI: A New Innovation Beyond General-Purpose AI,” Samsung SDS Insight Report, https://www.samsungsds.com/kr/insights/the-rise-of-business-specific-artificial-intelligence.html, retrieved September 2025.
2. 류정원, 한상린, 박태영 (2021). “혼합연구방법을 통한 프로모션 참여 요인의 탐색적 연구: 커피전문점 프로모션 사례를 중심으로,” 경영학연구, 제50권 5호, pp.1381-1400.
Ryu, J. W., Han, S. L., and Park, T. Y. (2021). “An Exploratory Study of the Engagement Factors in Promotion Using Mixed Methods: Focusing on the Special Promotion of Coffee Company,” Korean Management Review, 50(5), pp.1381-1400.
3. 오민정 (2019). “23년간(1996~2018) 국내학술연구의 ‘고령’ 키워드로 살펴본 빅데이터 분석,” 경영학연구, 제48권 2호, pp.515-532.
Oh, M. J. (2019). “A Topic Modeling Analysis from the ‘Aging’ Keyword of Domestic Academic Research,” Korean Management Review, 48 (2), pp.515-532.
4. 이선녕, 윤상혁 (2025). “레스토랑 예약 앱 사용자 리뷰의 시계열적 감성 및 주제 반응 탐색: 정교화 가능성 모델 관점에서의 실증 분석,” 경영학연구, 제54권 5호, pp.1437-1455.
Lee, S. N. and Yoon, S. H. (2025). “Temporal Analysis of Sentiment and Topic Responses in Restaurant Reservation App User Reviews: An Empirical Study from the Perspective of the Elaboration Likelihood Model,” Korean Management Review, 54(5), pp.1437-1455.
5. 이용구, 김선욱 (2024). “LDA, Top2Vec, BERTopic 모형의 토픽모델링 비교 연구: 국외 문헌정보학 분야를 중심으로,” 한국문헌정보학회지, 제58권 1호, pp.5-30.
Lee, Y. G. and Kim, S. W. (2024). “A Comparative Study on Topic Modeling of LDA, Top2Vec, and BERTopic Models Using LIS Journals in WoS,” Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 58(1), pp. 5-30.
6. 정다현, 김희웅, 윤상혁 (2023). “메타버스 이용자 경험요인이 만족도에 미치는 영향: 텍스트 마이닝과 계량 분석 혼합방법론,” 정보시스템연구, 제32권 3호, pp.19-39.
Jeong, D. H., Kim, H. W., and Yoon, S. H. (2023). “Unraveling the relationship between the dimensions of user experience and user satisfaction in metaverse: A Mixed-methods Approach,” The Journal of Information Systems, 32(3), pp.19-39.
7. Adadi, A., Lahmer, M. and Nasiri, S. (2022). “Artificial Intelligence and COVID-19: A systematic umbrella review and roads ahead,” Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 34(8), pp.5898-5920.
8. Adams, L. “AI experts warn electricity costs may stunt growth,” BBC News, https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20g3dr4n4no, retrieved September 2025.
9. Cristofaro, M. and Giardino, P. L. (2025). “Surfing the AI waves: The historical evolution of artificial intelligence in management and organizational studies and practices,” Journal of Management History, Advance online publication.
10. Dogru, A. K. and Keskin, B. B. (2020). “AI in operations management: Applications, challenges and opportunities,” Journal of Data, Information and Management, 2(2), pp.67-74.
11. George, G., Haas, M. R., and Pentland, A. (2014). “Big data and management: From the editors,” Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), pp.321-326.
12. Gupta, S., Wang, Y., Patel, P., and Czinkota, M. (2025). “Navigating the future of AI in marketing: AI integration across borders, ethical considerations, and policy implications,” International Journal of Information Management, 82, 102871.
13. Hawkins, A. J. “Waymo explores using Google’s Gemini to train its robotaxis,” The Verge, https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/30/24283516/waymo-google-gemini-llm-ai-robotaxi, retrieved September 2025.
14. Heater, B. “Nvidia details Mega, a fleet manager for warehouse robots,” TechCrunch, https://techcrunch.com/2025/01/06/nvidia-details-mega-warehouse-robot-fleet-management-simulator, retrieved September 2025.
15. Helo, P. and Hao, Y. (2021). “Artificial Intelligence in Operations Management and Supply Chain Management: An Exploratory Case Study,” Production Planning & Control, 33 (16), pp.1573-1590.
16. Kim, K., Kogler, D. F., and Maliphol, S. (2024). “Identifying interdisciplinary emergence in the science of science: Combination of network analysis and BERTopic,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), Article 603.
17. Liu, Y., Li, H., Goncalves, J., Kostakos, V., and Xiao, B. (2016). “Fragmentation or Cohesion? Visualizing the Process and Consequences of Information System Diversity, 1993-2012,” European Journal of Information Systems, 26(5), pp.509-533.
18. Lu, Y. “Intel Moves Forward With $25 Billion Chip Plant Expansion in Israel,” The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/27/world/middleeast/intel-israel-factory-expansion.html, retrieved September 2025.
19. Ozek, B., Lu, Z., Pouromran, F., Radhakrishnan, S., and Kamarthi, S. (2023). “Analysis of pain research literature through keyword co-occurrence networks,” PLOS Digital Health, 2(9), e0000331.
20. Perez, S. “Snap and Amazon Partner on AR Shopping in the Snapchat App, Initially for Eyewear,” TechCrunch, https://techcrunch.com/2022/11/02/snap-and-amazon-partner-on-ar-shopping-in-the-snapchat-app-initially-for-eyewear/, retrieved September 2025.
21. Raisch, S. and Krakowski, S. (2021). “Artificial intelligence and management: The automation –augmentation paradox,” The Academy of Management Review, 46(1), pp.192-210.
22. Ramaul, L., Ritala, P., Kostis, A., and Aaltonen, P. (2025). “Rethinking How We Theorize AI in Organization and Management: A Problematizing Review of Rationality and Anthropomorphism,” Journal of Management Studies, Advance online publication.
23. Reynolds, K. “COVID-19 increased the use of AI. Here’s why it’s here to stay,” World Economic Forum, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/02/covid-19-increased-use-of-ai-here-s-why-its-here-to-stay/, retrieved September 2025.
24. Robins−Early, N. “Disinformation reimagined: how AI could erode democracy in the 2024 US elections,” The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jul/19/ai-generated-disinformation-us-elections, retrieved September 2025.
25. Ruiz-Real, J. L., Uribe-Toril, J., Torres, J. A., and De Pablo, J. (2021). “Artificial intelligence in business and economics research: Trends and future,” Journal of Business Economics and Management, 22(1), pp.98-117.
26. Sarker, I. H. (2022). “AI-Based Modeling: Techniques, Applications and Research Issues Towards Automation, Intelligent and Smart Systems,” SN Computer Science, 3, Article 158.
27. Shakir, U., “Here’s how Apple’s AI model tries to keep your data private,” The Verge, https://www.theverge.com/2024/6/13/24175985/apple-intelligence-ai-model-local-cloud-privacy-how-it-works, retrieved September 2025.
28. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (2024). The AI Index 2024 annual report. https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2024-ai-index-report
29. Van de Ven, A. H., and Johnson, P. E. (2006). “Knowledge for theory and practice,” Academy of Management Review, 31(4), pp.802-821.
30. Vinh, N. X., Epps, J., and Bailey, J. (2010). “Information Theoretic Measures for Clusterings Comparison: Variants, Properties, Normalization and Correction for Chance,” The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, pp.2837-2854.
31. Wang, X., & Zhang, M. M. (2022). “Sharing the same bed with different dreams: Topic modeling the research-practice gap in public relations 2011-2020,” Journal of Marketing Communications, 30(4), pp.413-437.
32. Wang, Z., Chen, J., Chen, J. and Chen, H. (2024). “Identifying interdisciplinary topics and their evolution based on BERTopic,” Scientometrics, 129, pp.7359-7384.
33. Weatherbed, J., “TSMC delays Arizona factory that will eventually build chips for iPhones and AI,” The Verge, https://www.theverge.com/2023/7/20/23802107/tsmc-arizona-chip-factory-delay-q2-earnings-report, retrieved September 2025.
34. Yang, D., Zhao, W. G., Du, J., and Yang, Y., (2022), “Approaching Artificial Intelligence in business and economics research: A bibliometric panorama (1966-2020),” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(3), pp.563-578.
35. Zoting, S. “Artificial Intelligence (AI) market size, share, and trends 2025 to 2034,” Precedence Research, https://www.precedenceresearch.com/artificial-intelligence-market, retrieved September 2025.

∙ 저자 윤민범은 연세대학교 정보대학원 석사과정에 재학 중이다. 주요 관심분야는 데이터마이닝, 데이터 애널리틱스, 디지털 비즈니스, Generative AI 등이다.

∙ 저자 김재희는 연세대학교 정보대학원에서 박사과정을 진행 중이며, 디지털 서비스 연구실에서 Design Science using AI 연구를 진행 중이다. 주요 관심분야는 AI based Social Science, Design Science, LLM 등이다.

∙ 저자 김희웅은 National University of Singapore 정보시스템학과에서 근무한 후, 현재 연세대학교 정보대학원 교수로 재직 중이다. 주요 연구분야는 디지털 비즈니스, 정보시스템 관리 및 활용 등이다. 관련 연구들은 MIS Quarterly, Information Systems Research, Journal of Management Information Systems 등에 60여 편의 논문이 게재되었다. MIS Quarterly의 Associate Editor로 활동해왔다.