External Knowledge and Product Innovation in Korean Firms: Interaction Between Learning and Searching Modes

References

• Ahuja, G., and Morris Lampert, C. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), pp.521-543. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.176]
• Ahuja, G., and Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), pp. 197-220. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.157]
• Almirall, E., and Casadesus-Masanell, R. (2010). Open versus closed innovation: A model of discovery and divergence. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), pp.27-47. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.1.zok27]
• Apanasovich, N. (2014). Modes of innovation: a grounded meta-analysis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, pp.1-18.
• Aslesen, H. W., Isaksen, A., and Karlsen, J. (2012). Modes of innovation and differentiated responses to globalisation―a case study of innovation modes in the Agder region, Norway. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(4), pp.389-405. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0060-9]
• Baldwin and Clark (2000), Managing in the modular age: Architectures, Networks, and Organizations Chapter 5, The MIT Press: Cambidge, London.
• Baldwin, C. Y., and Clark, K. B. (2006). The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model?. Management Science, 52(7), pp.1116-1127. [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0546]
• Bstieler, L., and Hemmert, M. (2015). The effectiveness of relational and contractual governance in new product development collaborations: Evidence from Korea. Technovation, 45, pp.29-39. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.07.003]
• Bierly, P. E., Damanpour, F., and Santoro, M. D. (2009). The application of external knowledge: organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), pp.481-509. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00829.x]
• Çetindamar, D., Wasti, S. N., Ansal, H., and Beyhan, B. (2009). Does technology management research diverge or converge in developing and developed countries?. Technovation, 29(1), pp.45-58. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.04.002]
• Cetindamar, D., Phaal, R., and Probert, D. (2009). Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities. Technovation, 29(4), pp.237-246. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.004]
• Chandler Jr, A. D. (1997). The Coming of Big Business. The Comparative Approach to American History, 106.
• Chen, J., Chen, Y., and Vanhaverbeke, W. (2011). The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 31(8), pp.362-373. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.03.002]
• Chesbrough, H., and Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), pp.229-236. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x]
• Chesbrough, H. W., and Appleyard, M. M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50(1),pp. 57-76. [https://doi.org/10.2307/41166416]
• Clausen, T. H., Korneliussen, T., and Madsen, E. L. (2013). Modes of innovation, resources and their influence on product innovation: Empirical evidence from R&D active firms in Norway. Technovation, 33(6), pp.225-233. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.02.002]
• Cockburn, I. M., and Henderson, R. M. (1998). Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157-182. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00067]
• Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), pp.569-596. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2233763]
• Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp.128-152. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553]
• Collins, C. J., and Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), pp.544-560. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794671]
• Eckhardt, J. T., and Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), pp.333-349. [https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630302900304]
• Fitjar, R. D., and Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway. Research Policy, 42(1), pp.128-138. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.009]
• Fleming, L., and Sorenson, O. (2001). Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 30(7), pp.1019-1039. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00135-9]
• González-Pernía, J. L., Parrilli, M. D., and Peña-Legazkue, I. (2015). STI–DUI learning modes, firm–university collaboration and innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(3), pp.475-492. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9352-0]
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110]
• Grant, R. M., and Baden-Fuller, C. (2004). A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), pp.61-84. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00421.x]
• Guan, J. C., Richard, C. M., Tang, E. P., and Lau, A. K. (2009). Innovation strategy and performance during economic transition: Evidences in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 38(5), 802-812. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.009]
• He, Z. L., and Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), pp.481-494. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078]
• Hernández-Espallardo, M., Sánchez-Pérez, M., and Segovia-López, C. (2011). Exploitation-and exploration-based innovations: the role of knowledge in inter-firm relationships with distributors. Technovation, 31(5), pp.203-215. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.01.007]
• HS Chae, Y Choi and E Heo (2014). Open innovation in venture firms: The impact of external search strategy on innovation performance of Korean manufacturing firms, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), pp.1-13 [https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.9.1.201402.1]
• Huh, M. G. (2011). Knowledge Search and Innovation. Journal of Business Research, 40(5), pp.1247-1271.
• Hull, C. E., and Covin, J. G. (2010). Learning Capability, Technological Parity, and Innovation Mode Use*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(1), pp.97-114. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00702.x]
• Isaksen, A., and Karlsen, J. (2010). Different modes of innovation and the challenge of connecting universities and industry: case studies of two regional industries in Norway. European Planning Studies, 18(12), pp. 1993-2008. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2010.516523]
• Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., and Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36(5), pp. 680-693. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006]
• Lee, J., and Huh, M. G. (2016). How Does External Knowledge Source Influence Product Innovation In Korean Firms?. Journal of Applied Business Research, 32(2), 449. [https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v32i2.9588]
• Lee, J.S., Park, J.H., and Bae, J.T. (2016). The Effects of Open Innovation on Innovation Productivity: Focusing on External Knowledge Search. Knowledge Management Research, 17(1), pp.49-72.
• Kale, P., Singh, H., and Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), pp.217-237. [https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<217::AID-SMJ95>3.0.CO;2-Y]
• Katila, R., and Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), pp.1183-1194. [https://doi.org/10.5465/3069433]
• Katila, R. (2002). New product search over time: past ideas in their prime?. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), pp.995-1010. [https://doi.org/10.5465/3069326]
• Kirner, E., Kinkel, S., and Jaeger, A. (2009). Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technology firms―An empirical analysis of German industry. Research Policy, 38(3), pp.447-458. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.011]
• Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. (1995). On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24(2), pp.185-205. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00762-I]
• Kogut, B., and Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), pp.383-397. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383]
• Koput, K. W. (1997). A chaotic model of innovative search: some answers, many questions. Organization Science, 8(5), 528-542. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.5.528]
• Laursen, K., and Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), pp. 131-150. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507]
• Leiponen, A., and Helfat, C. E. (2010). Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), pp.224-236. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.807]
• Levitt, B., and March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, pp. 319-340. [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535]
• Levinthal, D., and March, J. G. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2(4), pp.307-333. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(81)90012-3]
• Levinthal, D. A., and March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), pp.95-112. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009]
• Lichtenthaler, U., and Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability-based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), pp.1315-1338. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00854.x]
• Lin, J. L., Fang, S. C., Fang, S. R., and Tsai, F. S. (2009). Network embeddedness and technology transfer performance in R&D consortia in Taiwan. Technovation, 29(11), pp.763-774. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.001]
• Lorenz, E. (2012). Labor market institutions, skills, and innovation style: a critique of the ‘Varieties of Capitalism’perspective. In Interactive Learning for Innovation (pp. 72-89). Palgrave Macmillan UK. [https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230362420_3]
• Lundvall, B. Å., and Lorenz, E. (2007, October). Modes of Innovation and Knowledge Taxonomies in the Learning economy. In CAS workshop on Innovation in Firms.
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), pp.71-87. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71]
• Mowery, D. C., and Oxley, J. E. (1995). Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), pp.67-93.
• Nelson, R. R. (2005). Technology, institutions, and economic growth. Harvard University Press.
• Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), pp.14-37. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14]
• Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford university press. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3]
• Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, pp.187-206. [https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<187::AID-SMJ936>3.0.CO;2-K]
• OECD. Publishing. (2015). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2011. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
• Park, S. M., and Lee, B. H. (2008). The Impact of Exploration, Exploitation, and R&D Organization on Innovations in the Korean SMEs. Korea Technology Innovation Society, 11(1), 118-143.
• Park, W. W., Kim, M. S., Jeong, S. M., and Huh, K. M. (2007). Causes and remedies of common method bias. Korean Academy of Management, 15(1), pp.89-133.
• Parrilli, M. D., and Elola, A. (2012). The strength of science and technology drivers for SME innovation. Small Business Economics, 39(4), pp.897-907. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9319-6]
• Reichstein, T., and Salter, A. (2006). Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(4), pp.653-682. [https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtl014]
• Robertson, P. L., and Patel, P. R. (2007). New wine in old bottles: Technological diffusion in developed economies. Research Policy, 36(5), 708-721. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.008]
• Roh, D.H., Hwang, K.H., and Park H.Y. (2017). The impact of open innovation activities on performance of Korean IT SMEsVenture : Technology Transfer Experiences and Technological Collaborations. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), pp.33-46. [https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.12.1.201702.33]
• Rosenkopf, L., and Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), pp. 287-306. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.160]
• Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: technology and economics. Cambridge University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611940]
• SH Lee, Y Chae and Y Seo (2003), Using of external knowledge based on knowledge classification, The e-Business Studies. 4(2), pp.55-76.
• S Yi (2009), Utilization of knowledge base and its requisites for the performance of innovation using external knowledge, Knowledge Management Research. 10(4), pp.75-91. [https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2009.10.4.006]
• Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), pp.1319-1350. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640]
• Terjesen, S., and Patel, P. C. (2015). In Search of Process Innovations The Role of Search Depth, Search Breadth, and the Industry Environment. Journal of Management, 0149206315575710. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575710]
• Urban, G. L., and Von Hippel, E. (1988). Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Science, 34(5), pp.569-582. [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.34.5.569]
• Von Hippel, E. (1998). Economics of product development by users: The impact of “sticky” local information. Management Science, 44(5), pp.629-644. [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.5.629]
• Wuyts, S., Dutta, S., and Stremersch, S. (2004). Portfolios of interfirm agreements in technology-intensive markets: Consequences for innovation and profitability. Journal of Marketing, 68(2), pp.88-100. [https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.2.88.27787]