Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Korean Academic Society of Business Administration
[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 49, No. 6, pp.1621-1641
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2020
Received 17 Jul 2020 Revised 08 Sep 2020 Accepted 26 Sep 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2020.49.6.1621

경영학 교수의 연구성과에 영향을 미치는 요인

Eui-Kyung Lee
(First Author) Department of Business Administration Daejin University eklee@daejin.ac.kr
Influential Factors of the Research Performance in Business Administration


Copyright 2011 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The concerns of this study are the factors that influence the research performance of the business administration professors in Korea. The factors are classified into two groups; organizational and personal factors. Therefore the organizational factor model is for finding the environmental factors that affect the research performance. These factors are the location and the type of the university, the salary and research fund. The type of the university and the research fund are found to be significant. The personal factor model is for finding the personal factors. The personal factors are career period, major, industry experience, US doctorate, school, and sex. Career period and industry experience are related positively but US doctorate is negatively to the research performance. Regarding the major the research performance of MIS or marketing is higher than that of other majors. The test whether the school where professors graduated from affects the research performance shows professors from some schools exhibit higher research performance than others. The integrated model is used for confirming the relationship between the research performance and the significant factors found in the above two models. The results of this study can be useful in evaluation and compensation system based on the research performance.

Keywords:

Research Performance, Organizational Factors, Personal Factors

References

  • Allison, P. D., and Long, J. S. (1990), “Departmental Effects on Scientific Productivity,” American Sociological Review, 55(4), pp.469-478. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2095801]
  • Barney, J. B. (1991), “Firm Resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of Management, 17, pp.99-120. [https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108]
  • Barney, J. B. & Arikan, A. M. (2001), “The resource-based view: Origins and implications. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, J. S. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell Handbook of Strategin Management(pp.124-188). Malden, Massachusetts; Blackwell Publishers, Inc.
  • Becker, G. S. (1962), “Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis,” Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), pp.9-49. [https://doi.org/10.1086/258724]
  • Bellas, M. L. & Toutkoushian, R. K. (1999), “Faculty time allocation and research productivity: Gender race, and family effects,” The Review of Higher Education, 22(4), pp.367-390. [https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1999.0014]
  • Biglan, A. (1973), “Relationship between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), pp.204-213. [https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034699]
  • Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. (2006), “The impact of appointment type on the productivity and commitment of full-time faculty in research and doctoral institutions,” Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), pp.89-123. [https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2006.0002]
  • Dundar, H. & Lewis, D. R. (1998), “Determinants of research productivity in higher education,” Research in Higher Education, 39, pp.607-631. [https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018705823763]
  • Grant, R. M. (2002), Contemporary strategy analysis : Concepts, techniques, applications, Oxford : Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Hesli, V. L,, and Lee, J. M. (2011), “Faculty research productivity: why do some of our colleagues publish more than others?,” Political Science & Politics, 44(2), pp.393-408. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511000242]
  • Jung, J. S.,(2011), “Analysis of Academic Scholarship by Career Stage Among Korean Academics,” Seoul National University, Ph.D. thesis.
  • Kim, H. H., and Park, J. B.,(2011), “Impacts of Professor’s Personal Characters and University Research Environments on Research Performances,” The Journal of Educational Administration, 29(2), pp.185-210.
  • Lee, J. S.,(2014), “Three essays on empirical labor economics : using data of employment-education from a Korean university,” Sungkyunkwan University Ph.D. thesis.
  • Link, A. N., Swann, C. A., and Bozeman, B. (2008), “A time allocation study of university faculty,” Economics of Education Review, 27(4), pp.363-374. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.04.002]
  • Long, J. S. and McGinnis, R. (1981), “Organizational Context and Scientific Productivity,” American Sociological Review, 46(4), pp.422-442. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2095262]
  • Marsh, H, W. & Hattie, J. (2002), “The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness,” Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), pp.603-641. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2002.11777170]
  • Maske, K. L., Durden, G. C., and Gaynor. P. E. (2003), “Determinants of scholarly productivity among male and female economists,” Economic Inquiry, 41(4), pp.555-564. [https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/cbg027]
  • Noser, T. C., Manakyan, H., & Tanner, J. R. (1996), “Research productivity and perceived teaching effectiveness: A survey of economicx faculty,” Research in Higher Education, 37(3), pp.298-321. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01730119]
  • Over, R. (1982), “Does research productivity decline with age?” Higher Education, 11(5), pp.511-520. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194416]
  • Oster, S. M., and Hamermesh, D. S. (1998), “Aging and Productivity among Economists,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), pp.154-166. [https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557258]
  • Park, J. W.,(1998), “A Case Study on Strategic Faculty Performance Evaluation System,” Journal of Industry and Management, 17(1), pp.33-59.
  • Schultz, T. P. (1960), “Capital Formation by Education,” Journal of Political Economy, 68(6), pp.571-583. [https://doi.org/10.1086/258393]
  • Toutkoushian, R. K., Porter, S. R., Danielson, C., & Hollis, P. R. (2003), “Using Publications counts to measure an institution’s research productivity,” Research in Higher Education, 44(2), pp.121-148. [https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022070227966]
  • Wanner, R. A., Lewis, L. S. & Gregorio, D. I. (1981), “Research productivity in Academia: a comparative study of the sciences, social sciences and humanities,” Sociology of Education, 54(4), pp.238-253. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2112566]
  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A resource-based view of the firm,” Management Journal, 5(2), pp.171-180. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207]
  • Xie, Y., and Shauman. K. A. (1998), “Sex differences in research productivity: new evidence about an old puzzle,” American Sociological Review, 63(6), pp.847-870. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2657505]
  • Yook, K. H.,(2010), “Causal Relationship among Variables of Faculty Performance Evaluation-An Empirical Analysis-,” The Journal Finance and Accounting Information, 10(4), pp.1-18.

∙ The author Eui-Kyung Lee is currently a professor in the Department of Business Administration at Daejin University. He graduated from Sungkyunkwan University’s Department of Economics and obtained his Master and Ph.D. in business administration from Seoul National University. His major fields of study include corporate finance, agency theory, and valuation.