Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Korean Academic Society of Business Administration
[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 45, No. 5, pp.1551-1586
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Oct 2016
Received 19 Jan 2016 Revised 04 May 2016 Accepted 02 Jun 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2016.45.5.1551

사회적 책임 활동은 기업의 위험을 완화시키는가?

이지혜* ; 변희섭**
*(주저자) 한국건설산업연구원 연구위원 jihyelee@cerik.re.kr
**(교신저자) 한림대학교 경영대학 재무금융학과 조교수 heesbyun@hallym.ac.kr
Does Corporate Social Responsibility Activities Reduce the Risk of Firms?: Evidence from Korea
Ji Hye Lee* ; Hee Sub Byun**
*Research Fellow, Construction & Economy Research Institute of Korea, First Author
**Assistant Professor, Department of Finance, College of Business, Hallym University, Corresponding Author

초록

최근 자본시장에서 사회적 책임 활동이 대두되고 있는 현실에 주목하여, 본 연구는 관련한 활동 수행이 기업경영에 내재한 불확실성을 완화시킬 수 있는가를 실증적으로 확인한다. 실증분석결과, 사회적 책임 활동의 적극적인 이행은 기업에 내재한 위험을 유의적으로 감소시키는 것으로 관찰되었으며, 이러한 효과는 주로 기업 고유의 위험(firm specific risk)을 통해 나타났다. 추가적으로 사회적 책임 활동은 위험조정 투자수익률에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 관찰되어 본 연구의 결과가 기업가치 관련성에 대한 주요한 경로로 작용할 수 있음을 확인할 수 있었다. 이상의 결과는 기업이 적극적인 사회적 책임 활동을 통해 위험 완화라는 편익을 누림으로써 원활히 외부자금을 조달함은 물론, 영업활동의 지속 가능성을 강화시킬 수 있음을 시사한다. 한편, 앞선 결과는 규모가 작은 기업이나 대규모 기업집단에 소속되지 않은 독립기업에서 보다 강하게 관찰되었다.

본 연구는 사회적 책임 활동에 대한 상반된 논의가 제기되고 있는 가운데, 국내 자본시장에서 동 활동 이행의 편익에 대한 구체적인 실증적 논거를 제시함으로써 기업에 전략적 시사점을 제공할 것으로 예상된다. 더불어 본 연구의 결과는 기업의 사회적 책임 활동을 장려하기 위한 정책입안 및 규제도입의 근거자료로도 활용이 가능할 것이다.

Abstract

As the corporate social responsibility (CSR) is an issue of growing importance in the recent Korean capital market, this paper investigates the effect of it on the inherent uncertainty of firms' management. Understanding of firms’ intrinsic risk is very crucial, as firms make various financial decisions, such as investment and raising capital, based on the risk-return trade-off. For instance, investors demand high required rated of return from firms with high risk, and those firms could raise capital in smooth water when they realize the risk. In addition, firms with high business risk also have high bankruptcy risk, so shareholders and creditors of those firms should grasp such risk in advance.

By focusing on the relation between CSR and risk of the firm, we strengthen the understanding of financial benefit and cost from the CSR activities. Between the two competing perspectives of the CSR, we examine which one is empirically supported. One part of the existing studies has positive view on the CSR: it could be a strategy that satisfies various stakeholders (strategic choice hypothesis), and signals high value of the firm to the capital market (product signaling hypothesis). According to them, CSR will help firms with reducing risks and obtaining stable future cash flow. On the contrary, the other part hypothesizes that CSR brings much cost and does not increase the firm value (irrelevance hypothesis). Moreover, as its result is hard to be attained in a short term, managers could over-investment in it to enhance their reputation (overinvestment hypothesis). These hypotheses assume the CSR activities will increase the risk of the firm.

Empirically, we confirm that the CSR activities have a significant negative effect on the total risk of the firm, especially the unsystematic risk (firm-specific risk). Moreover, we find that the CSR activities have a significant positive effect on risk-adjusted stock return. This result implies that the risk reduction effect could be considered as the main path of the increase of firm value suggested in previous literatures. In sum, firms with brisk CSR activities are benefited with timely financing and the improvement of business sustainability due to the risk reduction. In the meantime, the risk reduction effect is strongly observed in firms with low asset scale and stand-alone firms. As there are two conflicting views about the CSR activities, we provide firms with strategic implications by presenting empirical findings of benefits from the activities. Additionally, our findings could support the making of policies and the introduction of regulations that encourage the activities.

Keywords:

Corporate social responsibility activities, Uncertainty, Risk of firms, Firm-specific risk, Asset scale

키워드:

사회적 책임 활동, 불확실성, 기업 위험, 비체계적 위험, 기업 규모

References

  • 강상구·김학순·임현일(2015), “기업의 사회적 책임과 주가급락 위험에 관한 연구,” 보험금융연구, 26, 113-139.
  • 강윤식·국찬표(2011), “기업의 사회적 책임, 지배구조 및 기업가치,” 한국증권학회지, 40, 713-748.
  • 김창수(2009), “기업의 사회적 책임 활동과 기업가치,” 한국증권학회지, 38, 507-545.
  • 노정희·최종서(2014), “CSR활동이 재무적 제약에 미치는 영향,” 대한경영학회지, 27, 1329-1349.
  • 박경서·변희섭·이지혜(2012), “내생성(endogeneity) 문제를 통제한 환경경영과 기업가치 간의 관계에 관한 연구,” 재무연구, 25, 293-324.
  • Ang, J., J. Chua, and J. McConnell(1982), “The Administrative Costs of Corporate Bankruptcy : A note,” Journal of Finance 37, 219-226.
  • Baek, J., J. Kang, and K. Park(2004), “Corporate Governance and Firm Value: Evidence from the Korean Financial Crisis,” Journal of Financial Economics 71, 265-313. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00167-3]
  • Barnea, A. and A. Rubin(2010), “Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict between Shareholders,” Journal of Business Ethics 97, 71-86. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z]
  • Beiting, C., I. Ioannou, and G. Serafeim(2016), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Access to Finance,” Strategic Management Journal, Forthcoming.
  • Brammer, S., C. Brooks, and S. Pavelin(2006), “Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures,” Financial Management 35, 97-116. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2006.tb00149.x]
  • Byun, H., J. Lee., and K. Park(2015), “Impact of Controlling Shareholders on Corporate Social Responsibility under External Financial Constraints,” Seoul Journal of Business 21, 1-44. [https://doi.org/10.35152/snusjb.2015.21.2.001]
  • Carroll, A.(1999), “Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct,” Business and Society 38, 268-295. [https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800303]
  • Cui, J., H. Jo, and H. Na(2016), “Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Information Asymmetry?,” Journal of Business Ethics, Forthcoming. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-3003-8]
  • El Ghoul, S., O. Guedhami, C. Kwok, and D. Mishra (2011), “Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Cost of Capital?,” Journal of Banking & Finance 35, 2388-2406. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007]
  • Froot, K., D. Scharfstein, and J. Stein(1993), “Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Policies.” Journal of Finance 48, 1629-1658. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05123.x]
  • Garbett, T.(1988), How to Build a Corporation’ Identity and Project Its Image, Lexington Books.
  • Harjoto, M. and H. Jo(2011), “Corporate Governance and CSR Nexus,” Journal of Business Ethics 100, 45-67. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0772-6]
  • Husted, B.(2005), “The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Test of the Risk Management Hypothesis,” Journal of Business Ethics 60, 175-183. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3777-1]
  • Jensen, M.(1986), “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers,” American Economic Review 76, 323-329.
  • Jo, H. and H. Na(2012), “Does CSR Reduce Firm Risk?: Evidence from Controversial Industry Sectors,” Journal of Business Ethics 110, 441-456.
  • Jo, H., and M. Harjoto(2011), “Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Business Ethics 103, 351–383. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0869-y]
  • Kim, Y., H. Li, and S. Li(2014), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Price Crash Risk,” Journal of Banking & Finance 43, 1-13. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.02.013]
  • Margolis, J., and J. Walsh(2003), “Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business.” Administrative Science Quarterly 48, 268-305. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3556659]
  • Porter, M.(1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, Free Press.
  • Schwartz. R.(1968), “Corporate Philanthropic Contributions,” Journal of Finance 22, 479-497. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00821.x]
  • Shin, H., and R. Stulz(1998), “Are Internal Capital Markets Efficient?,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 531-552. [https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555676]
  • Sprinkle, G. and L. Maines(2010), “The Benefits and Costs of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Business Horizon 53, 445-453.
  • Stein, J.(1997), “Internal Capital Markets and the Competition for Corporate Resources,” Journal of Finance 52, 111-134.

• 저자 이지혜는 현재 한국건설산업연구원 연구위원으로 재직중이다. 고려대학교 경영대학에서 재무론 전공으로 박사학위를 취득하였으며, 박사 학위 후에는 서울시립대학교 경영대학 강사, 고려대학교 부설 기업지배구조연구소 연구원, 고려대학교 경영대학 연구교수로 재직하였다. 주요 연구 분야는 대리인이론, 외부 경영통제장치(상품시장에서의 경쟁, 기업경영권시장 등)의 효율성 등이다.

• 저자 변희섭은 현재 한림대학교 경영대학 재무금융학과 조교수로 재직중이다. 고려대학교 경영대학에서 재무론 전공으로 박사학위를 취득하였으며, 박사 학위 후에는 이화여자대학교 경영대학 강사, 예금보험공사 연구위원으로 재직하였다. 주요 연구 분야는 기업지배구조이론 및 실증, 기업의 사회적 책임 활동 전략, 금융기관의 경영전략 등이다.