Korean Academic Society of Business Administration
[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 45, No. 3, pp.795-827
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Jun 2016
Received 17 Feb 2015 Revised 10 Jan 2016 Accepted 21 Feb 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2016.45.3.795

고객공격행동이 근로자들의 직장 내 일탈행동에 미치는 영향: 심리적 소유감의 조절효과

공혜원* ; 김효선**
*(주저자) 중앙대학교 경영학과 시간강사 chomiri79@cau.ac.kr
**(교신저자) 중앙대학교 경영경제대학 경영학부 부교수 hkim3@cau.ac.kr
The Effect of Customer Aggression on Workplace Deviant Behavior: Focus on the Moderating Effect of Psychological Ownership
Hyewon Kong* ; Hyosun Kim**
*Lecturer, School of Business Administration, Chung-Ang University, First Author
**Associate professor, College School of Business Administration, Chung-Ang University, Corresponding Author

초록

최근 서비스 조직에서 발생하는 고객공격행동, 소위 ‘갑질행동’이 사회적 이슈가 되고 있다. 고객공격행동은 근로자들의 근로의욕을 감소시킴으로써 직무성과 저하를 초래할 뿐만 아니라, 근로자들의 비윤리적 행동을 유발함으로써 조직에 막대한 재정적 손실을 초래할 수 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 기업은 여전히 근로자 및 조직이 고객만족에 어떠한 영향을 미칠 수 있는가에만 관심이 있지, 반대로 고객 특히 근로자들에게 공격행동을 보이는 고객이 근로자 및 조직성과에 어떠한 영향을 미칠 수 있는지를 조명한 연구는 부족한 상황이다.

이러한 취지에서, 본 연구는 근로자들이 지각한 고객공격행동과 심리적 소유감이 조직 내 근로자들의 일탈행동(조직 일탈행동, 대인관계 일탈행동)에 미치는 효과를 살펴보고, 이들 관계에 있어 심리적 소유감이 어떠한 조절적 역할을 하는지에 대해 규명하고자 하였다. 본 연구 표본은 고객과 상호작용이 빈번하게 발생하는 1,2금융 종사자 및 금융 콜센터 서비스 종사자들이며, 이들을 대상으로 설문조사가 이뤄졌다. 총 394부의 설문지가 가설 검증 분석에 활용되었고, 분석방법은 Ping의 구조방정식 모형을 통한 조절효과 검증방법을 실시하였다.

분석 결과, 근로자들이 지각한 고객공격행동이 증가할수록 조직 일탈행동을 증가시키는 것으로 나타났고, 심리적 소유감은 조직 및 대인관계 일탈행동을 감소시키는 것으로 확인되었다. 심리적 소유감의 조절효과를 살펴본 결과, 고객공격행동과 대인관계 일탈행동의 관계에 대해서만 조절효과가 유의한 것으로 확인되었다. 구체적으로, 심리적 소유감 수준이 높은 사람은 심리적 소유감이 낮은 사람보다 고객공격행동을 많이 경험할수록 대인관계 일탈행동을 가파르게 증가시키는 것으로 확인되었다.

이러한 결과는 조직이 더 이상 ‘고객’이라는 명목 하에 고객들의 부적절한 행동들에 대해 좌시할 것이 아니라, 효과적인 조직성과 및 인적자원관리를 위해 선별적인 고객 대응 방침 마련의 필요성을 시사한다. 또한 심리적 소유감은 조직에 긍정적 영향을 미칠 수 있지만, 근로자들이 처한 상황(고객공격행동)에 따라 조직에 부정적 영향을 미칠 수 도 있다는 ‘양날의 칼’과 같은 효과가 있음을 주지해야한다. 따라서 조직 관리자들은 보다 적극적인 내부 제도 정비를 통해 근로자들의 생산성 향상은 물론 인권 보호에 앞장섬으로써 보다 효과적이며, 윤리적인 기업으로 발전할 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

Abstract

Recently, customer aggression occurring in the service organization has become a social issue. “The customer is always right” is a omnipresent organizational mantra, followed closely by “service with a smile”(Rafaeli and Sutton, 1987). In fact that in a consumer-centered economy it is impossible to ignore the effects of customer satisfaction on organizational performance. However, the core problem of these formulas is a power imbalance between customers and employees, that may lead customer to take advantage of employees.

Indeed, many studies are reporting the dark side of customer-employee transactions, where service providers are targets of customer aggression. Such experiences can cause organizational as well as personal costs. For instance, customer aggression has been found to be a predictor of job burnout, absence, turnover intension, and emotional exhaustion (Ben-Zur and Yagil, 2005; Glomb, 2002; Grandey et al., 2004; Harris and Reynolds, 2003). Moreover, customer aggression has been found to predict a decrease in job performance, an increase in employee withdrawal behavior(공혜원, 김효선, 2014; Bedi and Schat, 2007; Glomb, 2002).

It is revealed that psychological ownership can influence job attitude and behavior of employees (Pierce et al., 2001). Although It has been reported that customer aggression has negative effect on employees and organizations, but little attention has been given to the study on the relationship among customer aggression, deviant behavior, and psychological ownership is unknown. Especially, very few attempts have been made at the moderating effect of psychological ownership.

Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the main effect of customer aggression and psychological ownership on deviant behavior(Organizational deviance, Interpersonal deviance) and the moderating effect of psychological ownership on the relationship between customer aggression and deviant behavior.

It was hypothesized, in this study, that 1) Customer aggression is positively related to organizational deviance and interpersonal deviance. 2) Psychological ownership is negatively related to organizational deviance and interpersonal deviance. 3) The positive relationship between customer aggression and deviant behavior(organizational and interpersonal deviance) is stronger for those who had lower psychological ownership.

To test these relationships empirically, we collected data from 394 workers engaging in financial services, including those who work in the banking sector and customer call center of banks. A SEM (structural equation model) was used for the test of hypotheses.

Findings are as follows. First, it is confirmed that customer aggression increases both organizational deviance and interpersonal deviance. Second, those who had higher psychological ownership were less likely to show organizational deviance. However, the relationship between psychological ownership and interpersonal deviance is not significant. Lastly, it turned out that the moderating effect of psychological ownership is significant only in the relationship between customer aggression and interpersonal deviance. For instance, an employee with a high level of psychological ownership increases interpersonal deviant behavior for colleagues in the case where customer aggression increases.

The findings of this study suggest that organizations should no longer turn a blind eye to inappropriate customer behavior under the pretext of serving customers. Rather, organizations should prepare a selective customer response policy. Also, organization managers should keep in mind that psychological ownership is a “double-edged sword” that has both positive and negative effects on the organization, and take precautions in the proposal of human resource management solutions in the future.

Keywords:

customer aggression, psychological ownership, deviant behavior, destructive deviant behavior, workplace behavior, structural equation model(SEM), moderating effect

키워드:

공격행동, 일탈행동, 심리적 소유감, 구조방정식, 조절효과

References

  • 김용석(2010), “사회적 바람직성 척도의 개발,” 한국사회복지행정학, 12(3), 1-39.
  • 공혜원·김효선(2014), “직장 내 정서 경험에 따른 감정노동 프로세스 모델 구축에 관한 연구: 근거이론을 중심으로,” KBR(구 경영교육연구), 18(4), 325-359.
  • 공혜원·전병준·김효선 (2015), “감정조절전략과 조직시민행동의 관계에 대한 심리적 주인의식의 조절효과,” 조직과 인사관리연구, 39(3), 59-85.
  • 박상언·우정훈(2010), “감정부조화와 감성지능이 서비스직 사원의 비과업행동에 미치는 영향,” 경영학연구, 39(4), 963-994.
  • 서영석(2010), “상담심리 연구에서 매개효과와 조절효과 검증: 개념적 구분 및 자료 분석 시 고려 사항,” 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 22(4), 1147-1168.
  • 이봉세·박경규·임효창(2009), “직무특성과 주인의식문화가 심리적 소유감 및 태도에 미치는 영향,” 산업관계연구, 19(1), 139-167.
  • 정명호·유니나(2013), “팀 내 관계적 디모그라피와 권력지각이 직무태도와 성과에 미치는 영향,” 한국인사조직학회 발표논문집, 1-37.
  • 정양운·문형구(2011), “Psychological Ownership and Its Relationships with Its Antecedents and Constructive Deviant Behavior,” 인사·조직연구, 19(3), 67-98.
  • 조윤주(2011), “부모와의 역기능적 의사소통이 청소년의 게임중독에 미치는 영향: Ping 의 2 단계 접근방식을 적용한 여가만족도의 조절효과,” 청소년학연구, 18(3), 27-48.
  • 채진영(2012), “아동의 학업스트레스가 공격성에 미치는 영향:-부모애착의 조절효과를 중심으로,” 인간발달연구, 19(1), 71-87.
  • 최병권·조성일·한상엽 (2011), “조직변화의 특성과 변화몰입간의 관계에서 심리적 소유감과 변화유형의 역할에 대한 개념적 연구,” POSRI 경영경제연구, 11(3), 231-267.
  • 한주원·박경규 (2009), “상사의 비인격적 감독이 부하의 직장 내 일탈행동에 미치는 영향,” 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 22(2), 233-259.
  • 홍세희(2013), Program 2 구조방정식 모형의 중급방법, S & M 리서치.
  • 홍세희(2000), “구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거,” 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(2), 161-177.
  • Adams, J. S.(1965), “Inequity in Social Exchange,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2]
  • Ashforth, B. E., and Humphrey, R. H.(1993), “Emotional Labor in Service Roles: The Influence of Identity,” Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 88-115. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.3997508]
  • Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., and Luthans, F.(2009), “Psychological Ownership: Theoretical Extensions, Measurement and Relation to Work Outcomes,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 173-191. [https://doi.org/10.1002/job.583]
  • Baron, R. A.(1979), “Aggression, Empathy, and Race: Effects of Victim’s Pain Cues, Victim’s Race, and Level of Instigation on Physical Aggression,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9(2), 103–114. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1979.tb00797.x]
  • Baron, R. A.(1993), Affect and Organizational Behavior: When and Why Feeling Good (or bad) Matters. In J. K. Murningham, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Bedi, A., and Schat, A. C.(2007), “Customer Aggression: A Theoretical and Meta Analytic Review,” ASAC, 28(9), 115-127.
  • Bennett, R. J., and Robinson, S. L.(2000), “Development of a Measure of Workplace Deviance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349-360. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349]
  • Bensimon, H. F.(1994), “Violence in the Workplace,” Training and Development, 48(1), 27-32.
  • Ben-Zur, H., and Yagil, D.(2005), “The Relationship between Empowerment, Aggressive Behaviours of Customers, Coping, and Burnout,” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14(1), 81-99. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320444000281]
  • Berkowitz, L. (1998), “Affective Aggression: The Role of Stress, Pain, and Negative Affect,” Human Aggression: Theories, Research, and Implications for Social Policy, 49-72. [https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012278805-5/50004-3]
  • Bing, M. N., Stewart, S. M., Davison, H. K., Green, P. D., McIntyre, M. D., and James, L. R. (2007), “An Integrative Typology of Personality Assessment for Aggression: Implications for Predicting Counterproductive Workplace Behavior,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 7220744. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.722]
  • Bing, M. N., LeBreton, J. M., Davison, H. K., Migetz, D. Z., and James, L. R.(2007), “Integrating Implicit and Explicit Social Cognitions for Enhanced Personality Assessment: A General Framework for Choosing Measurement and Statistical Methods,” Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 346-389. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107301148]
  • Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., and Mohr, L. A.(1994), “Critical Service Encounters: The Employee's Viewpoint,” The Journal of Marketing, 58 (4), 95-106. [https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800408]
  • Blau, P. M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, Transaction Publishers.
  • Bowling, N. A., and Beehr, T. A.(2006), “Workplace Harassment from the Victim's Perspective: A Theoretical Model and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 998-1012. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.998]
  • Brown, G., and Crossley, C.(2008), What about Psychological Ownership and Territoriality? Questions We are Starting to Ask. In Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Los Angeles, CA. [https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2008.34146321]
  • Brown, G., Lawrence, T. B., and Robinson, S. L. (2005), “Territoriality in Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 577-594. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.17293710]
  • Browning, V.(2008), “An Exploratory Study into Deviate Behaviour in the Service Encounter: How and Why Front-Line Employees Engage in Deviant Behaviour,” Journal of Management and Organization, 14(4), 451-471. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S1833367200003205]
  • Burroughs, S. M.(2001), The Role of Dispositional Aggressiveness and Organizational Injustice on Deviant Workplace Behavior, Doctoral Dissertation, Pro-Quest Information & Learning.
  • Chung, Y. W., and Moon, H. K.(2011), “The Moderating Effects of Collectivistic Orientation on Psychological Ownership and Constructive Deviant Behavior,” International Journal of Business and Management, 6(12), 65-77. [https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n12p65]
  • Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., and Byrne, Z. S.(2003), “The Relationship of Emotional Exhaustion to Work Attitudes, Job Performance, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 160-169.
  • Dirks, K. T., Cummings, L. L., and Pierce, J. L. (1996), “Psychological Ownership in Organizations: Conditions Under which Individuals Promote and Resist Change,” Research in Organizational Change and Development, 9, 1-23.
  • Dormann, C., and Zapf, D.(2004), “Customer-Related Social Stressors and Burnout,” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(1), 61-82. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.9.1.61]
  • Filipczak, B.(1993), “Armed and Dangerous at Work,” Training.
  • Fornell, C., and Lacker. D. F(1981), “Evaluating Structural Evaluations Model With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. [https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104]
  • Fullerton, R. A., and Punj, G.(1993), “Choosing to Misbehave: A Structural Model of Aberrant Consumer Behavior,” Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1), 570-574.
  • Glomb, T. M.(2002), “Workplace Anger and Aggression: Informing Conceptual Models With Data from Specific Encounters,” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(1), 20-36. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.7.1.20]
  • Grandey, A. A., Dickter, D. N., and Sin, H. P.(2004), “The Customer Is Not Always Right: Customer Aggression and Emotion Regulation of Service Employees,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 397-418. [https://doi.org/10.1002/job.252]
  • Grandey, A. A., Kern, J. H., and Frone, M. R. (2007), “Verbal Abuse from Outsiders Versus Insiders: Comparing Frequency, Impact on Emotional Exhaustion, and the Role of Emotional Labor,” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(1), 63-79. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.63]
  • Greenberg, J., and Scott, K. S.(1996), “Why Do Workers Bite the Hands That Feed Them? Employee Theft as a Social Exchange Process,” Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, 18, 111-156.
  • Harris, L. C., and Reynolds, K. L.(2003), “The Consequences of Dysfunctional Customer Behavior,” Journal of Service Research, 6 (2), 144-161. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670503257044]
  • Harris, L. C., and Reynolds, K. L.(2004), “Jaycustomer Behavior: An Exploration of Types and Motives in the Hospitality Industry,” Journal of Services Marketing, 18(5), 339-357. [https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040410548276]
  • Hochschild, A.(1983), “The Managed Heart: Communication of Human Feeling,” Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Jussila, I., and Tuominen, P.(2008), Collective Feelings of Possession: Territorial Group Behaviors in Organizations, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Lee, K., and Allen, N. J.(2002), “Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Workplace Deviance: The Role of Affect and Cognitions,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131-142. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.131]
  • LeBlanc, M. M., and Kelloway, E. K.(2002), “Predictors and Outcomes of Workplace Violence and Aggression,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 444-453. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.444]
  • Lovelock, C.(1994), Product Plus: How Product + S Service = Competitive Advantage McGraw Hill.
  • MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., and Rucker, D. D.(2002), “On the Practice of Dichotomization of Quantitative Variables,” Psychological Methods, 7(1), 19-40. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.19]
  • Masterson, S. S.(2001), “A Trickle-Down Model of Organizational Justice: Relating Employees' and Customers' Perceptions of and Reactions to Fairness,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 594-604. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.594]
  • Moschis, G. P., and Cox, D.(1989), “Deviant Consumer Behavior,” Advances in Consumer Research, 16(1), 732-737.
  • Mulaik, S. A., et al.(1989), “Evaluation of Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models,” Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430-445. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430]
  • Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H.(1994), Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Neuman, J. H., and Baron, R. A.(1998), “Workplace Violence and Workplace Aggression: Evidence Concerning Specific Forms, Potential Causes, and Preferred Targets,” Journal of Management, 24(3), 391-419. [https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639802400305]
  • Omar, F., Halim, F., Zainah, A., and Farhadi, H. (2011), “Stress and Job Satisfaction as Antecedents of Workplace Deviant Behavior,” World Applied Sciences Journal, 12, 46-51.
  • Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., and Dirks, K. T.(2001), “Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298-310. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378028]
  • Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., and Dirks, K. T. (2003), “The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research,” Review of General Psychology, 7 (1), 84-107. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84]
  • Pierce, J. L., Rubenfeld, S. A., and Morgan, S.(1991), “Employee Ownership: A Conceptual Model of Process and Effects,” Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 121-144. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279000]
  • Ping Jr, R. A.(1996), “Latent Variable Interaction and Quadratic Effect Estimation: A Two-Step Technique Using Structural Equation Analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 166-175. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.166]
  • Rafaeli, A., and Sutton, R. I.(1987), “The Expression of Emotions as Part of the Work Role,” Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 23-37. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306444]
  • Robinson, S. L., and Bennett, R. J.(1995), “A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multidimensional Scaling Study,” Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555-572. [https://doi.org/10.2307/256693]
  • Robinson, S. L., and Bennett, R. J.(1997), “Workplace Deviance: Its Definition, Its Manifestations, and Its Causes,” Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 6, 3-27.
  • Rupp, D. E., McCance, A. S., Spencer, S., and Sonntag, K.(2008), “Customer(in) Justice and Emotional Labor: The Role of Perspective Taking, Anger, and Emotional Regulation,” Journal of Management, 2(5), 1-22. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307309261]
  • Rupp, D. E., and Spencer, S.(2006), “When Customers Lash Out: The Effects of Customer Interactional Injustice on Emotional Labor and the Mediating Role of Discrete Emotions,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (4), 971-978. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.971]
  • Scott, B. A., and Barnes, C. M.(2011), “A Multilevel Field Investigation of Emotional Labor, Affect, Work Withdrawal, and Gender,” Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 116-136. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.59215086]
  • Spector, P. E.(1994), “Using Self-report Questionnaires in OB Research: A Comment on the Use of a Controversial Method,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(5), 385-392. [https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150503]
  • Spector, P. E., and Jex, S. M.(1998), “Development of Four Self-Report Measures of Job Stressors and Strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory,” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 356-367. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.356]
  • Stewart, S. M., Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., Woehr, D. J., and McIntyre, M. D.(2009), “In the Eyes of the Beholder: A Non-Self-Report Measure of Workplace Deviance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 207-215.
  • Van Dyne, L., and Pierce, J. L.(2004), “Psychological Ownership and Feelings of Possession: Three Field Studies Predicting Employee Attitudes and Organizational Citizenship Behavior,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 439-459. [https://doi.org/10.1002/job.249]
  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., and Tellegen, A.(1988), “Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The Panas Scales,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063]
  • Yagil, D. (2008), “When the Customer Is Wrong: A Review of Research on Aggression and Sexual Harassment in Service Encounters,” Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(2), 141-152. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.03.002]
  • Yang, J., and Diefendorff, J. M.(2009), “The Relations of Daily Counterproductive Workplace Behavior with Emotions, Situational Antecedents, and Personality Moderators: A Diary Study in Hong Kong,” Personnel Psychology, 62 (2), 259-295. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01138.x]

·저자 공혜원은 현재 중앙대학교 경영대학 시간강사로 재직 중이다. 충북대학교 경영학과를 졸업하였고, 중앙대학교에서 경영학 석, 박사를 취득하였다. 주요 연구 분야는 감정노동, 정서, 사회적 책임 등이다.

·저자 김효선은 현재 중앙대학교 경영대학 부교수로 재직 중이다. 서울대학교 심리학 학, 석사를 졸업하였고, 미국 카네기멜론을 거쳐 MIT에서 경영학 박사를 취득하였다. 박사 학위 취득 이후에는 Hitotsubashi University에서 교환학생으로 있었고, Seikei University에서 전임강사로 재직한 바 있다. 주요 연구 분야는 일가정 양립, 여성리더십, 조직정체성, 조직문화, 감정노동 등이다.