Korean Academic Society of Business Administration
[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 45, No. 2, pp.593-614
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Apr 2016
Received 24 Jan 2015 Revised 31 Aug 2015 Accepted 20 Jan 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2016.45.2.593

상사의 비인격적 감독과 직장 내 일탈행동의 관계에서 조직동일시의 매개효과 탐색

황성주* ; 전병준**
*(주저자) 중앙대학교 일반대학원 경영학과 caiddtn@cau.ac.kr
**(교신저자) 중앙대학교 경영경제계열 경영학부 교수 blessyou@cau.ac.kr
The Relationship between Abusive Supervision and Workplace Deviance : Based on the Mediating Effect of Organizational Identification
Sung-Joo Hwang* ; Byung-June Chun**
*School of Business, Chung-Ang University, First Author
**College of Business and Economics, Chung-Ang University, Corresponding Author

초록

본 연구는 직장 상사의 비인격적 감독 행위가 부하의 직장 내 일탈행동에 영향을 미치는 과정에서 어떤 매개요인이 존재하는지 확인하고자 하였다. 국내에서 근무하는 사무직 종사자 217명을 대상으로 설문을 실시하였고, AMOS18 통계프로그램을 이용하여 연구모형의 타당성 및 경로계수를 분석하였다. 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다.

첫째, 직접효과로서 상사의 비인격적 감독은 조직동일시에 부(-)의 영향을 미치고 이어서 조직동일시는 직장 내 일탈행동 중 조직일탈에만 부(-)의 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 간접효과 분석에서 상사의 비인격적 감독은 조직동일시를 거쳐 조직일탈에 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 확인되었다.

본 연구를 통해 조직동일시가 상사의 부정적 리더십과 부하의 일탈행동 간에 중요한 연결고리가 되고 있음을 알 수 있다. 특히, 일탈행위 중에서 조직 전반에 직접적으로 피해를 끼치는 조직일탈행위에만 영향을 준다는 결과를 제시함으로써 인사 실무 영역에 시사점을 제공한다.

Abstract

The current study aims to investigate the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance as well as mediating effect of organizational identification based on a survey among 217 Korean employees in various industries. All analyses were conducted using PASW 18.0 and AMOS 18. The results of this study are described below.

We found that abusive supervision significantly reduced organizational identification by the employees. Additionally, organizational identification was negatively associated with organizational workplace deviance. No association was seen between organizational identification and interpersonal workplace deviance.

These findings indicated that organizational identification is an important mediating factor between abusive leadership and an employee's behavior. Specifically, we defined organizational identification as a mediator based on the concepts of reciprocity(Blau, 1964) and personified organization(Levinson, 1965). The results show that organizational identification was solely associated with organizational workplace deviance. Thus, Our findings suggest that an employee's organizational workplace deviance is indirectly triggered by abusive supervision through decreased organizational identification. This study further supports recommendations and implications for regulating supervisor behavior in workplace.

Keywords:

Abusive Supervision, Organizational Identification, Interpersonal Deviance, Organizational Deviance

키워드:

상사의 비인격적 감독, 조직동일시, 대인일탈, 조직일탈

Acknowledgments

본 연구는 황성주의 석사학위 논문 일부를 발췌 및 수정하였음. 이 논문은 2015년도 중앙대학교 연구장학기금 지원에 의한 것임.

This research was supported by the Chung-Ang University Research Scholarship Grants in 2015

References

  • 김원형(1994). 조직 동일시 모형: 선행 변인, 결과 변인과의 관계. 한국심리학회지 산업 및 조직, 7(1), 55-86.
  • 김원형(2003). 조직 동일시의 교차 타당도 모형: 선행 변수, 조직 시민행동, 조직 몰입, 직무 관여와의 관계. 조직과 인사관리연구, 27(1), 1-32.
  • 로버트 서튼(2007). 또라이 제로 조직. 이실MBA.
  • 오아라·박경규·용현주(2013). 조직지원인식과 직장 내 일탈행동의 관계: 정서적 몰입의 매개효과와 조직기반 자긍심의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 26(1), 119-147.
  • 이정훈·문지영·허일무·이종호(2014). 상사의 비인격적 감독이 부하의 조직동일시와 조직일탈행동에 미치는 영향. 한국산학기술학회논문지, 15(5), 2806-2820.
  • 최동호(2010). 조직문화유형과 조직 동일시, 조직몰입간의 관계 연구. 중앙대학교 글로벌인적자원개발대학원, 석사학위논문.
  • 한주원·박경규(2009). 상사의 비인격적 감독이 부하의 직장 내 일탈행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 22(2), 233-259.
  • 황성주·전병준(2014). 상사의 비인격적 감독이 직장 내 일탈행동에 미치는 영향: 조직지원인식의 매개효과를 중심으로. 한국HRD연구, 9(3), 1-24.
  • Anderson, C., Keltner, D., and John, O. P.(2003). Emotional Convergence between People over Time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1054. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1054]
  • Ashforth, B. E., and Mael, F.(1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999]
  • Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., and Corley, K. G.(2008). Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325-374. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059]
  • Aulakh, P. S., and Gencturk, E. F.(2000). International Principal–Agent Relationships: Control, Governance and Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(6), 521-538. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(00)00126-7]
  • Baron, R. A., & Richardson, D. R. (1994). Human Aggression (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum.
  • Bass, B. M. (1991). From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S]
  • Bennett, R. and Robinson, S.(2000). Development of a Measure of Workplace Deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349-360. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349]
  • Blau, P.(1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: Wiley.
  • Burns, J. M.(1978). Leadership, 1978. New Yorker: Harper & Row.
  • Bushman, B. J., and Anderson, C. A.(2001). Is It Time to Pull the Plug on the Hostile versus Instrumental Aggression Dichotomy?. Psychological Review, 108, 273-279. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.273]
  • Christie, R. and Geis, F. L.(1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-174450-2.50006-3]
  • Cohen-Charash, Y., and Spector, P. E.(2001). The Role of Justice in Organizations: A MetaAnalysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278-321. [https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2958]
  • DeVries, D. L., and Kaiser, R. B.(2003). Going Sour in the Suite: What You Can Do about Executive Derailment. In Workshop presented at the Maximizing Executive Effectiveness Meeting of the Human Resources Planning Society, Miami, FL.Christie, R. and Geis, F. L.(1970). Studies in machiavellianism. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Dutton, J. E., and Dukerich, J. M.(1991). Keeping an Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity in Organizational Adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 517-554. [https://doi.org/10.2307/256405]
  • Epitropaki, O.(2003). Transformational Leadership, Psychological Contract Breach And Organizational Identification. In Academy of Management Proceedings. Academy of Management, 2003(1), 1-6. [https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2003.13792488]
  • Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F.(1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 382-388. [https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313]
  • Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black(1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Hall, D. T., Schneider, B., and Nygren, H. T. (1970). Personal Factors in Organizational Identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2). [https://doi.org/10.2307/2391488]
  • Harman, H. H.(1976). Modern Factor Analysis. University of Chicago Press.
  • Hogan, R., and Hogan, J.(2001). Assessing Leadership: A View from the Dark Side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9 (1-2), 40-51. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00162]
  • Hogan, J., Hogan, R., and Kaiser, R. B.(2010). Management Derailment. American Psychological Association Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3, 555-575. [https://doi.org/10.1037/12171-015]
  • Hollinger, R. C. and Clark, J.(1982). Formal and Informal Social Controls of Employee Deviance. Sociological Quarterly, 23, 333-343. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1982.tb01016.x]
  • Kark, R., Shamir, B., and Chen, G.(2003). The Two Faces of Transformational Leadership: Empowerment and Dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 246. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.246]
  • Koper, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Bouhuijs, F., Vermunt, R., and Wilke, H.(1993). Procedural Fairness and Self-Esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23(3), 313-325. [https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420230307]
  • Lehman, W. and Simpson, D.(1992). Employee Substance Abuse and on-the-job Behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 309-321. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.3.309]
  • Levinson, H.(1965). Reciprocation: The Relationship between Man and Organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9(4), 370-390. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2391032]
  • Lind, E. A., Greenberg, J., Scott, K. S., and Welchans, T. D.(2000). The Winding Road from Employee to Complainant: Situational and Psychological Determinants of Wrongful-Termination Claims. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 557-590. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2667109]
  • Liu, D., Liao, H., and Loi, R.(2012). The Dark Side of Leadership: A Three-Level Investigation of the Cascading Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employee Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1187-1212. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0400]
  • Mael, F.(1988). Organizational Identification: Construct Redefinition and a Field Application with Organizational Alumni(Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University).
  • Mael, F., and Ashforth, B. E.(1992). Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123. [https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202]
  • Mael, F. A., and Ashforth, B. E.(1995). Loyal from Day One: Biodata, Organizational Identification, and Turnover among Newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48(2), 309-333. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01759.x]
  • Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., and Taylor, M. S.(2000). Integrating Justice and Social Exchange: The Differing Effects of Fair Procedures and Treatment on Work Relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 738-748. [https://doi.org/10.2307/1556364]
  • Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., and Van Dick, R.(2006). Social Identities and Commitments at Work: Toward an Integrative Model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 665-683. [https://doi.org/10.1002/job.383]
  • Mills, C. W., and Gerth, H. H.(Eds.).(1958). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford University Press.
  • Molm, L. D.(1997). Risk and Power Use: Constraints on the Use of Coercion in Exchange. American Sociological Review, 113-133. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2657455]
  • Norman, S. M., Avey, J. B., Nimnicht, J. L., and Pigeon, N. G.(2010). The Interactive Effects of Psychological Capital and Organizational Identity on Employee Citizenship and Deviance Behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809353764]
  • O'Reilly, C. A., and Chatman, J.(1986). Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, Identification, and Internalization on Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492]
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., and Fetter, R.(1990). Transformational Leader Behaviors and Their Effects of Followers’ Trust in Leader, Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107-142. [https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7]
  • Robinson, S., and Bennett, R.(1995). A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multi-Dimensional Scaling Study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555-572 [https://doi.org/10.2307/256693]
  • Rotundo, M., and Sackett, P. R.(2002). The Relative Importance of Task, Citizenship, and Counterproductive Performance to Global Ratings of Job Performance: A Policy-Capturing Approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.66]
  • Smart, B. D.(1999). Topgrading. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Sujan, H., Weitz, B. A., and Kumar, N.(1994). Learning Orientation, Working Smart, and Effective Selling. The Journal of Marketing, 39-52. [https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800303]
  • Sy, T., Côté, S., and Saavedra, R.(2005). The Contagious Leader: Impact of the Leader's Mood on the Mood of Group Members, Group Affective Tone, and Group Processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 295. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.295]
  • Tajfel, H.(1972). Experiments in Vacuum. In J. Isreal, and H. Tajfel(Eds.), The Context of Social Psychology. London: Academic Press.
  • Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C.(1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33(47), 74.
  • Tepper, B. J.(2000). Consequences of Abusive Supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178-190. [https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375]
  • Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Henle, C. A., and Lambert, L. S.(2006). Procedural Injustice, Victim Precipitation, and Abusive Supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59, 101-123. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00725.x]
  • Tepper, B. J., and Taylor, E. C.(2003). Relationships among Supervisors' and Subordinates' Procedural Justice Perceptions and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 97-105. [https://doi.org/10.2307/30040679]
  • Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., Breaux, D. M., Geider, S., Hu, C., and Hua, W.(2009). Abusive Supervision, Intentions to Quit, and Employees’ Workplace Deviance: A Power/ Dependence Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 156-167. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.03.004]
  • Tesser, A.(1988). Toward a Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model of Social Behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 181-228. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60227-0]
  • Trice, H. M., and Beyer, J. M.(1986). Charisma and Its Routinization in Two Social Movement Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 113-164
  • Tyler, T. R.(1999). Why People Cooperate with Organizations: An Identity-Based Perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 201-246.
  • Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., and Liden, R. C.(1997). Perceived Organizational Support and LeaderMember Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111. [https://doi.org/10.2307/257021]
  • Wegge, J., Van Dick, R., Fisher, G. K., Wecking, C., and Moltzen, K.(2006). Work Motivation, Organisational Identification, and Well-Being in Call Centre Work. Work & Stress, 20(1), 60-83. [https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370600655553]
  • Van Dick, R., Christ, O., Stellmacher, J., Wagner, U., Ahlswede, O., Grubba, C., and Tissington, P. A.(2004). Should I Stay or Should I Go? Explaining Turnover Intentions with Organizational Identification and Job Satisfaction. British Journal of Management, 15 (4), 351-360. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.00424.x]
  • Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., and Duffy, M. K.(2002). Abusive Supervision and Subordinates’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1068-1076. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1068]

·저자 황성주는 현재 중앙대학교 대학원 경영학과 인사조직전공 박사과정에 재학 중이며, 중앙대학교 경영학부를 졸업하고 동대학원에서 석사학위를 취득하였다. 주요연구분야는 조직행동, 리더십 등이다.

·저자 전병준은 현재 중앙대학교 경영학부 인사조직전공 정교수로 재직 중이다. 서울대학교 경영대학 및 대학원 경영학과를 졸업하였으며, 미국 오리건 주립대학교에서 인사조직 박사학위를 취득하였다. 한국경영학회 상임이사, 부회장 및 인사조직학회 상임이사, 한국국제경영학회 상임이사를 역임하였다. 주요연구분야는 리더십, 조직관리, 예술 및 엔터테인먼트경영, 비교조직행동 등이다.