Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Korean Academic Society of Business Administration
[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 46, No. 1, pp.213-233
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 28 Feb 2017
Received 29 Jun 2016 Accepted 09 Dec 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2017.46.1.213

팀의 특성과 팀 효능감 간 관계에 대한 TMS의 매개효과

오원경*
*(주저자) 한양대학교 new-jung@hanmail.net
The Mediating Role of TMS in the Relationship between Team Characteristic and Team Efficacy
Wonkyung Oh*
*Ph.d. Candidate, Graduate School, anyang University, First Author

초록

본 연구는 팀의 특성과 팀 효능간 관계에 대한 TMS의 매개효과를 살펴보고자 하였다. 먼저, 팀의 과업 특성을 나타내는 과업 상호의존성, 팀 구성원들의 기질적 특성을 나타내는 학습 목표지향성 그리고 관계적 특성을 나타내는 팀 응집성이 TMS에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 살펴보았다. 다음으로는 TMS가 팀이 과업을 성공적으로 수행할 수 있을 것이라는 구성원들의 믿음을 나타내는 팀 효능감에 미치는 효과를 살펴보고, 마지막으로 팀의 특성과 팀 효능감 사이의 관계를 TMS가 매개하는지를 살펴보았다. 자료수집기간은 2013년 10월부터 11월까지 약 2달에 걸쳐 설문지 응답법을 통해 이루어졌고, 최종적으로 49개 팀, 237명으로부터 설문지를 회수하여 최종 통계분석에 사용하였다. 실증분석 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다, 첫째, 과업상호의존성, 학습 목표지향성, 팀 응집성은 각각 TMS에 정적인 유의미한 관계를 갖는다. 둘째, TMS는 팀 효능감에 정적인 유의미한 관계를 갖는다. 셋째, TMS는 과업상호의존성, 학습 목표지향성 및 팀 응집성과 팀 효능감 간 관계에 있어 유의미한 매개효과를 갖는다는 것을 밝혔다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the mediating role of TMS in the relationship between team characteristics and team efficacy. Wegner(1987) defined that “TMS is the way that groups process and structure information and as the shared division of cognitive labor regarding group members' encoding, storing, and retrieving of information.” Thus, TMS is a team cognitive process (Kozlowski and Ilgen, 2006), capturing team members' combining of individuals' distributed knowledge and utilizing each other's expertise. It consist of three aspects: specialization, credibility, and coordination (Moreland, 1999).

In work settings, TMS affected by team environments, yet team characteristics such as task interdependence, team members' learning goal orientation and team cohesion have not received attention. Therefore, we predict that task interdepdence, team learning goal orientation and team cohesion will be positively associated with TMS. Also, we expect TMS as antecedents of team efficacy. Furthermore, we propose that TMS will mediate the relationships between team characteristics and team efficacy.

The analysis was carried out from November, 2013 until December, 2013. To test these hypothesis, we collected survey-based data from 237 members and 49 teams. The independent variables used in paper are task interdependence, learning goal orientation and team cohesion, the mediation variable is TMS, and the dependent variable is team efficacy.

The results of the empirical analysis are as follows; First, task interdependence was positively related to team's TMS. Furthermore, team members' learning goal orientation and team cohesion were positively related to team's TMS. These findings suggest that team characteristics affect TMS. Second, TMS was linked to team efficacy. Third, TMS mediated the team characteristics - team efficacy links. These findings of the present study provide important theoretical and practical implications for team research.

The limitation of this study can be summed up as follows; The first concerns the validity of our measures. Our hypotheses were tested using self-reported data, which may raise concerns regarding common method bias. Future researchers may use objective measures such as performance as dependent variable. Second, because of the use of cross-sectional data, conclusions on causal order cannot be drawn. Our study implies that team characteristics precedes TMS. However, it is possible that the relationship between team characteristics and TMS is reciprocal or that it is the reverse of what we have theorized. Future researchers may test causal effects by using longitudinal research designs. The use of longitudinal research designs can also help to examine the development of TMS over time.

Keywords:

TMS, Task Interdependence, Learning Goal-Orientation, Team Cohesion, Team Efficacy

키워드:

TMS, 과업상호의존성, 학습목표지향성, 팀 응집성, 팀 효능감

References

  • 박희진·손영우 (2009), “임파워링 리더행동과 팀원들의 학습행동 및 교류기억의 관계: 팀 효능감, 혁신성향 및 리더에 대한 신뢰의 매개효과,” 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 22, 1-25.
  • 임희정·강혜련 (2006), “지식근로자의 공유인지와 팀 효과성의 관계,” 지식경영연구, 6, 1-24.
  • Arthur, W., B. D. Edwards, S. T. Bell, A. J. Villado, and W. Bennett (2005). “Team Task Analysis: Ldentifying Tasks and Jobs that are Team Based.” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 47(3), 654-669. [https://doi.org/10.1518/001872005774860087]
  • Bandura, A.(1982), “Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency,” American Psychologist, 37(2), 122. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122]
  • Bandura, A.(1997), Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control, New York: Freeman.
  • Bandura, A.(2000), “Exercise of Human Agency through Collective Efficacy,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75-78. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064]
  • Bell, B. S., and S. W. J. Kozlowski(2002), “Goal Orientation and Ability: Interactive Effects on Self-efficacy, Performance, and Knowledge,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 497-505. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.497]
  • Brandon, D. P., and A. B. Hollingshead(2004), “Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People,” Organization Science, 15, 633-644. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0069]
  • Brodbeck, F. C.(1996), “Criteria for the Study of Work Group Functioning,” In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology (pp. 285-315), Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Brown, S. P., and T. W. Leigh(1996), “A New Look at Psychological Climate and its Relationship to Job Involvement, Effort and Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 358-368. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.358]
  • Butler, R.(1993), “Effects of Task-and Ego-achievement Goals on Information-seeking During Task Engagement,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 18-31. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.18]
  • Button, S. B., J. E. Mathieu, and D. M. Zajac (1996), “Goal Orientation in Organizational Research: A Conceptual and Empirical Foundation,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 26-48. [https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0063]
  • Campion, M. A., G. J. Medsker, and A. C. Higgs (1993), “Relationships between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups,” Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x]
  • Carless, S, A., and C. De Paola(2000), “The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams,” Small Group Research, 31(1), 71-88. [https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100104]
  • Chan, D.(1998), “Functional Relationships among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234]
  • Craig, T. Y., and J . R. Kelly(1999), “Group Cohesiveness and Creative Performance,” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 3, 243-256. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.3.4.243]
  • Deshon, R. P., K. R. Milner, S. W. J. Kozlowski, R. J. Toney, A. M. Schmidt, and D. Wiechmann (1999), “The Effects of Team Goal Orientation on Individual and Team Performance,” In D. Steele-Johnson (Chair), New Directions in Goal Orientation Research: Extending the Construct, the Nomological Net, and Analytic Methods, Symposium Conducted at the 14th Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychologists, Atlanta, GA.
  • Deshon, R. P., and J. Z. Gillespie(2005), “A Motivated Action Theory Account of Goal Orientation,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1096-1127. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1096]
  • Deutsch, M., and R. M. Krauss(1962), “Studies of Interpersonal Bargaining,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 6, 52-76. [https://doi.org/10.1177/002200276200600107]
  • Dweck, C. S.(1986), “Motivational Processes Affecting Learning,” American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040]
  • Dweck, C. S.(1999), Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Development. Ann Arbor, MI: Psychology Press.
  • Dweck, C. S., and E. L. Leggett(1988), “A Social-cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality,” Psychological Review, 95, 256-273. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256]
  • Earley, P. C.(1993), “East Meets West Meets Mideast: Further Explorations of Collectivistic and Individualistic Work Groups,” Academy of Management Journal, 36, 319-348. [https://doi.org/10.2307/256525]
  • Earley P. C.(1999), “Playing Follow the Leader: Status-determining Traits in Relation to Collective Efficacy Across Cultures,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 192-212. [https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2863]
  • Edmondson, A. C.(1999), “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999]
  • Elliot, A. J., and M. A. Church(1997), “A Hierarchical Model of Approach and Avoidance Achievement Motivation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218]
  • Elliot, A. J., and H. A. McGregor(2001), “A 2 x 2 Achievement Goal Framework,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-514. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501]
  • Evans, C. R., and K. L, Dion(1991), “Group Cohesion and Performance: A Meta - analysls,” Small Group Research, 22(2), 175-186. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496491222002]
  • Gulati, R.(1995), “Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances,” Academy of Management Journal, 38, 85-112. [https://doi.org/10.2307/256729]
  • Guzzo, R. A., P. R. Yost, R. J. Campbell, and G. P. Shea(1993), “Potency in Groups: Articulating a Construct,” British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb00987.x]
  • Gibson, C. B.(1999), “Do they do what they Believe they Can? Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness across Tasks and Cultures,” Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 138-152. [https://doi.org/10.2307/257089]
  • Gibson, C. B.(2001), “Me and Us: Differential Relationships among Goal Setting Training, Efficacy, and Effectiveness at the Individual and Team Level,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 789-808. [https://doi.org/10.1002/job.114]
  • Gibson, C. B., and P. C. Earley(2007), “Collective Cognition in Action: Accumulation, Interaction, Examination, and Accommodation in the Development and Operation of Group Efficacy Beliefs in the Workplace,” Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 438-458. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351397]
  • Gibson, C. B., and J. Manuel(2003), “Multi-cultural Communication Processes in Virtual Teams,” In C. B. Gibson and S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual Teams that Work: Creating the Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness, (pp. 59–86), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Gibson, C. B., A. E. Randel, and P. C. Earley(2000), “Understanding Group Efficacy: an Empirical Test of Multiple Assessment Methods,” Group and Organization Management, 25, 67-97. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601100251005]
  • Gist, M. E.(1987), “Self-efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,” Academy of Management Review, 12, 472-485. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306562]
  • Gladstein, D. L.(1984), “Groups in Context: A Model of Task Group Effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2392936]
  • Gully, S. M., K. A. Incalcaterra, A. Joshi, and J. M. Beaubien(2002), “A Meta-analysis of Team-efficacy, Potency, and Performance: Interdependence and Level of Analysis as Moderators of Observed Relationships,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 819-832. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819]
  • Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black(1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hinsz, V. B., R. S. Tindale, and D. A. Vollrath (1997), “The Emerging Conceptualization of Groups as Information Processors,” Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43]
  • Hollingshead, A. B.(1998), “Retrieval Processes in Transactive Memory Systems,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 659-671. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.659]
  • Hollingshead, A. B.(2001), “Cognitive Interdependence and Convergent Expectations in Transactive Memory,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1080-1089. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1080]
  • Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler(1999), “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives,” Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118]
  • James, L. R., R. G. Demaree, and G. Wolf (1984), “Estimating within-group Interrater Reliability with and without Responses Bias,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85]
  • Klein, K. J., and S. W. J. Kozlowski(2000), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, (pp. 3–90), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Klein, K. J., and J. C. Zeigert(2004), “Leader Development and Change over Time: A Conceptual Integration and Exploration of Research Challenges,” In D. Day, S. Zaccaro, and S. M. Halpin (Eds.), Leader Development for Transforming Organizations, (pp. 359-382), Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
  • Kozlowski, S. W., and D. R. Ilgen(2006). “Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x]
  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., S. M., Gully, K. G. Brown, E. Salas, E. M. Smith, and E. R. Nason(2001), “Effects of Training Goals and Goal Orientation Traits on Multidimensional Training Outcomes and Performance Adaptability,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 1-31. [https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2930]
  • Lawler, E. J., S. R. Thye, and J. Yoon(2000), “Emotion and Group Cohesion in Productive Exchange,” American Journal of Sociology, 106, 616-657. [https://doi.org/10.1086/318965]
  • Leonard, D., and S. Sensiper(1998). “The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation,” California Management Review, 40(3), 112-132. [https://doi.org/10.2307/41165946]
  • Lester, S. W., B. M. Meglino, and M. A. Korsgaard (2002), “The Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Longitudinal Investigation of Newly Formed Work Groups,” Academy of Management Journal, 45, 352-368. [https://doi.org/10.5465/3069351]
  • Lewis, K.(2003), “Measuring Transactive Memory Systems in the Field: Scale Development and Validation,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 587–604. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587]
  • Lewis, K.(2004), “Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-worker Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems,” Management Science, 50, 1519-1533. [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0257]
  • Lewis, K., M. Belliveau, B. Herndon, and J. Keller (2007), “Group Cognition, Membership Change, and Performance: Investigating the Benefits and Detriments of Collective Knowledge,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 159-178. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.005]
  • Liang, D. W., R. L. Moreland, and L. Argote (1995), “Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384-393. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295214009]
  • Lindsley, D. H., D. J. Brass, and J. B. Thomas (1995), “Efficacy Performance Spirals: A Multilevel Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 20, 645-678. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080333]
  • McGrath, J. E.(1964), Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Mischel, L. J., and G. B. Northcraft(1997), “I Think We Can, I Think We Can: The Role of Efficacy Beliefs in Group and Team Effectiveness,” Advances in Group Processes, 14, 177-197.
  • Moreland, R. L.(1999), “Transactive Memory: Learning Who Knows What in Work Groups and organizations,” In L. Thompson, D. Messick, and J. Levine (Eds.), Sharing Knowledge in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge (pp. 3-31), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603227-1]
  • Mullen. B., and C. Copper(1994), “The Relation Between Group Cohesiveness and Performance: An Integration,” Psychological Bulletin. 115, 210-227. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210]
  • Muthen, L. K., and B. O. Muthen(2007), Mplus Users’ Guide, (3rd ed.), Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
  • Muthén, L. K., and Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus User's Guide: Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables: User'ss Guide. Muthén & Muthén.
  • Nahapiet, J., and S. Ghoshal(1998), “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225]
  • O’'Reilly, C. A., D. F. Caldwell, and W. P. Barnett (1989), “Work Group Demography, Social Integration, and Turnover,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21–37. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2392984]
  • Parker L. E.(1994), “Working Together: Perceived Self and Collective-efficacy at the Workplace,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 43-59. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00552.x]
  • Pearce, J. L., and H. B. Gregersen(1991), “Task Interdependence and Extra Role Behavior: A Test of the Mediating Effects of Felt Responsibility,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 838-844. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.838]
  • Porter, C. O. L. H(2005), “Goal Orientation: Effects on Backing up Behavior, Performance, Efficacy and Commitment in Teams,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 811-818. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.811]
  • Reagans, R., and B. McEvily(2003), “Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240-267. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3556658]
  • Rosenthal, T. L., and B. J. Zimmerman(1978), Social Learning and Cognition, New York: Academic Press.
  • Saavedra, R., P. C. Earley, and L. Van Dyne, (1993), “Complex Interdependence in Task-performing Groups,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61-72. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.61]
  • Seashore, S. E(1954), Group Cohesiveness in the Industrial Work Group, Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research.
  • Sundstrom, E., K. P. De Meuse, and D. Futrell (1990), “Work Teams: Applications and Effectiveness,” American Psychologist, 45, 120-133. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.120]
  • Tindale, R. S., and E. M. Anderson(1998). Small Group Research and Applied Social Psychology. In R. S. Tindale, L. Heath, J. Edwards, E. Posavac, F. B. Bryant, & Y. Suarez-Balcazar(Eds.), Theory and Research on Small Groups (pp. 1-8). New York: Plenum.
  • Tjosvold, D., and M. Tjosvold(1991), Leading the Team Organization: How to Create an Enduring Competitive Advantage, New York: Lexington Books.
  • Tesluk, P. E., and J. E. Mathieu(1999), “Overcoming Roadblocks to Effectiveness: Incorporating Management of Performance Barriers into Models of Work Group Effectiveness,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 200-217. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.200]
  • Uzzi, B.(1996), “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect,” American Sociological Review, 61, 674-698. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2096399]
  • VandeWalle, D.(1997), “Development and Validation of a Work Domain Goal Orientation Instrument,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995-1015. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057006009]
  • VandeWalle, D., S. P. Brown, W. L. Cron, and J. W. Jr. Slocum(1999), “The Influence of Goal Orientation and Self-regulation Tactics on Sales Performance: A Longitudinal Field Test,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 249-259. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.249]
  • Wageman, R.(1995), “Interdependence and Group Effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2393703]
  • Wageman, R., and G. Baker(1997), “Incentives and Cooperation: The Joint Effects of Task and Reward Interdependence on Group Performance,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 139-158. [https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199703)18:2<139::AID-JOB791>3.0.CO;2-R]
  • Wegner, D. M., R. Erber, and P. Raymond(1991), “Transactive Memory in Close Relationships,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923-929. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.923]
  • Zaccaro, S. J., V. Blair, C. Peterson, and M. Zazanis (1995), “Collective Efficacy,” In J. Maddux (Eds.), Self-efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment. (pp. 305-328), New York: Plenum. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5_11]
  • Zaccaro. S. J., and C. A. Lowe(1988), “Cohesiveness and Performance on an Additive Task: Evidence for Multidimensional,” Journal of Social Psychology. 128(4), 547-558. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1988.9713774]
  • Zaccaro, S. J., and M. C. McCoy(1988), “Tbe Effects of Task and Interpersonal Cohesiveness on Performance of a Disjunctive Group Task,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 837-851. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01178.x]
  • Zaheer, A., B. McEvily, and V. Perrone(1998), “Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance,” Organization Science, 9, 141-159. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.2.141]
  • Zander A. W., and H. Medow(1963), “Individual and Group Aspiration,” Human Relations, 16, 89-105. [https://doi.org/10.1177/001872676301600105]
  • Zhang Z. X., P. S. Hempel, Y. L. Han, and D. Tjosvold(2007), “Transactive Memory System Links Work Team Characteristics and Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1722-730. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1722]
  • Zhong, X., Q. Huang,, R. M. Davison,, X. Yang, and H. Chen(2012), “Empowering Teams through Social Network Ties,” International Journal of Information Management, 32, 209-220. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.11.001]

• 저자 오원경은 현재 한양대학교 경영대학 조직인사전공 박사 과정을 수료하였으며, 주요연구분야는 팀, 소셜 네트워크, 인지, 다수준 분석 연구 등이다.