Korean Academic Society of Business Administration
[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 46, No. 1, pp.25-47
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 28 Feb 2017
Received 12 Mar 2016 Revised 25 Aug 2016 Accepted 24 Oct 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2017.46.1.25

조직정체성이 조직기반자존감에 미치는 영향과 조직사회화의 조절효과에 관한 연구

장용선* ; 조대환**
*(주저자) 조선대학교 경영학부 부교수 changk6567@chosun.ac.kr
**(교신저자) 조선대학교 경영학부 초빙객원교수 popcho10@gmail.com
Relations between Organizational Identity, Organizational Socialization, and Organizational Based Self Esteem
Yong-sun Chang* ; Dae-hwan Cho**
*Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, Chosun University, First Author
**Invited Visiting Professor, Department of Business Administration, Chosun University, Corresponding Author

초록

본 연구는 맥락변수인 조직수준의 조직정체성과 조직사회화가 개인 수준의 조직기반자존감에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 분석하고자 하였다. 따라서 주요 변수는 조직맥락 요소인 조직정체성 및 조직사회화와 개인의 조직기반자존감이다. 지금까지 조직기반자존감의 효과에 대한 연구는 많았지만 조직정체성 관련 선행변수에 대한 연구는 부족한 상황이었다. 긍정적인 조직정체성을 지닌 조직구성원들은 높은 수준의 조직기반자존감을 갖게 될 가능성이 높다. 그리고 구성원들은 조직사회화를 통해 조직의 가치와 규범을 학습한다. 본 연구는 조직수준에서 조직정체성과 조직사회화의 상호작용이 개인 수준의 조직기반자존감에 미치는 영향을 교차수준으로 분석하였다.

53개 조직 676명을 대상으로 분석한 HLM 분석결과 조직정체성은 조직기반자존감에 유의적인 정의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 조직정체성 강도와 조직사회화의 상호작용은 조직기반자존감에 정의 영향을 미쳤다.

결과적으로 조직 경영자들은 자신들의 조직과 다른 조직과의 유사성과 차이점을 분석하고, 적정수준의 차별성을 확보하여 강한 조직정체성을 조직에 뿌리내릴 필요가 있다. 또한 조직은 강한 조직정체성과 함께 효과적인 조직사회화 전략을 함께 사용함으로써 조직정체성을 내재화시켜 구성원들의 조직기반자존감을 높일 수 있을 것이다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the relationships among organizational identity, organizational socialization, and organizational based self esteem. Organizational identity suggests the fundamental concept and comprehensive characteristics of the organization. Over the last quarter century, organizational identity has been established as the key concept in organization study and has explained a variety of organizational phenomena. Although the concepts of identity have produced a great deal of theoretical attention, empirical studies that examine their effects have been rarely published.

This study analyzed the effects of organizational identity on members’ organizational based self esteem. The basis of social identity underlies the desire to improve and maintain self-esteem. And organizational socialization will moderate relationship between organizational identity and organizational based self esteem. This study made the research model based on the theoretical arrangement to explain these relationships between constructs.

Using the collected data from 676 members at 53 organizations in South Korea, we tested and confirmed the construct validity and internal consistency by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability by Cronbach's alpha. And we used hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to test cross-level effects of hypothesized relationship.

Multi-level research including cross-level research makes ourselves understood much of the nested complexity of real organizational life. Therefore, the multi-level perspective is important for organizational researchers to understand the complexity and richness of social phenomena that may emerge at different hierarchical levels.

We used hierarchical linear modeling in HLM 7.01 to test the hypotheses. These models are intercepts as outcome models. Organizational identity was significantly related to organizational based self esteem. This result supported Hypothesis 1. As organizational identity became stronger, individuals tended to increase organizational based self esteem. The significance of coefficient associated with the interaction of organizational identity and organizational socialization supported Hypothesis 2.

By drawing on theory and research from literature review and doing empirical analysis, the results supported the cross-level linkages between related variables. This research came to the conclusions to as follows: First, organizational identity of aggregating members' perception had positive effect on organizational based self esteem. Second, organizational socialization had moderating effect between organizational identity and organizational based self esteem. The findings suggest that organizational identity and socialization at the organizational-level is meaningful variable to understand individual attitude and behavior. Therefore, organizational management should endeavor to form favorable and distinctive organizational identity and concentrate on organizational socialization.

Keywords:

organizational identity, organizational socialization, organizational based self esteem, cross-level analysis

키워드:

조직정체성, 조직사회화, 조직기반자존감, 교차수준

References

  • 김상표·김태열(2004), “조직의 사회화 전략과 신입사원의 선도적 행위가 사회화 결과들에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구,” 인사조직연구, 12(1), 175-212.
  • 김철수·전순영(2015), “고성과 작업시스템의 교육훈련이 조직성과에 미치는 매개효과연구: 유한킴벌리 사례를 중심으로,” 대한경영학회지, 28(9), 2367-2383.
  • 남정민·이공희·전병준(2012), “전략적 인적자원관리와 조직몰입의 관계에 대한 연구-조직수준의 조직신뢰와 개인수준의 성취욕구의 매개효과 검증,” 인적자원관리연구, 19(5), 1-26.
  • 박경규(1996), “멘토시스템을 통한 신입사원의 조직사회화 전략,” 서강경영논총, 7, 95-110
  • 박원우·김재원·최혜원(2003), “레벨이슈(Level Issue)의 의미, 현상 및 해결방안,” 인사조직연구, 11(2), 199-233
  • 박호득·서희정·안영식(2012), “중소기업 근로자의 조직학습과 조직문화가 조직몰입에 미치는 영향,” 직업교육연구, 31(3), 67-88.
  • 이동섭·김기태·조봉순(2008), “자기효능감과 성과의 관계에 대한 재연구: 개인차 변수를 통제한 상대적 영향력,” 인사조직연구, 16(4), 75-107.
  • 정윤길·이규만(2011), “조직기반 자긍심의 영향요인과 혁신행동과의 관계,” 사회과학연구, 27(4), 321-342.
  • 차종석·김영배(1994), “평가자간 신뢰도 및 동의도에 관한 분석적 고찰,” 경영학연구, 23(특별호), 75-102.
  • 채연주·윤세준(2013), “전문가들의 사회적 정체성과 친사회적 행동: 경영컨설턴트와 변호사의 비교연구,” 인사조직연구, 21(1), 139-184.
  • Albert, S., and D. A. Whetten(1985), “Organizational Identity,” In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.7, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 263-295.
  • Allen, D. G.(2006), “Do Organizational Socialization Tactics Influence Newcomer Embeddedness and Turnover?,” Journal of Management, 32(2), 237-256. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305280103]
  • Allen, N. J., and J. P. Meyer(1990), “Organizational Socialization Tactics: A Longitudinal Analysis of Links to Newcomers’ Commitment and Role Orientation,” Academy of Management Journal, 33, 847-858. [https://doi.org/10.2307/256294]
  • Alvesson, M., and H. Willmott(2002), “Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing the Appropriate Individual,” Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 619-644. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00305]
  • Ashforth, B. E., S. H. Harrison, and K. G. Corley (2008). “Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions,” Journal of Management, 34, 325-374. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059]
  • Ashforth, B. E., and F. Mael(1989), “Social Identity Theory and Organization,” Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999]
  • Ashforth, B. E., and A. M. Saks(1996), “Socialization Tactics: Longitudinal Effects on Newcomer Adjustment,” Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 149-178. [https://doi.org/10.5465/256634]
  • Bartel, C. A.(2001), “Social Comparisons in Boundary-Spanning Work: Effects of Community Outreach on Members’ Organizational Identity and Identification,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 379-414. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3094869]
  • Baumeister, R. F., J. D. Campbell, J. I. Krueger, and K. D. Vohs(2003), “Does High Self-Esteem Cause Better Performance, Interpersonal Success, Happiness, or Healthier Lifestyles?,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(1), 1-44. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.01431]
  • Bliese, P. D.(2000), “Within-Group Agreement, Non-Independence, and Reliability: Implications for Data Aggregation and Analysis,” In K. J. Klein and S.W.J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multi-Level Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 349-381.
  • Bowling, N. A., K. J. Eschleman, and Q. Wang (2010), “A Meta‐Analytic Examination of the Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Subjective Well‐Being,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 915-934. [https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X478557]
  • Bouchikhi, H., C. M. Fiol, D. A. Gioia, K. Golden-Biddle, M. J. Hatch, H. Rao, and M. Schultz (1998), “The Identity of Organizations,” Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 33-41. [https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231495.n3]
  • Brickson, S. L.(2005), “Organizational Identity Orientation: Forging a Link between Identity and Organizations' Relations with Stakeholders,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 576-609. [https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.50.4.576]
  • Cable, D. M., and C. K. Parsons(2001), “Socialization Tactics and Person–Organization Fit,” Personnel Psychology, 54, 1-24. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00083.x]
  • Chao, G. T., A. M. O’Leary-Kelly, S. Wolf, H. J. Klein, and P. D. Gardner(1994), “Organizational Socialization: Its Content and Consequences,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 730-43. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.730]
  • Cheney, G., L. T. Christensen, C. Conrad, and D. J. Lair(2004), Corporate Rhetoric as Organizational Discourse. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Discourse, 79-103. [https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608122.n4]
  • Corley, K. G., and D. A. Gioia(2004), “Identity Ambiguity and Change in the Wake of a Corporate Spin-off,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173-208.
  • Commeiras, N., A. Loubes, and I. Bories-Azeau (2013), “Identification of Organizational Socialization Tactics: The Case of Sales and Marketing Trainees in Higher Education,” European Management Journal, 31, 164-178. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2012.05.002]
  • Dukerich, J. M., B. R. Golden, and S. M. Shortell (2002), “Beauty is in the Eye of the Heholder: The Impact of Organizational Identification, Identity, and Image on the Cooperative Behaviors of Physicians,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(3), 507-533. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3094849]
  • Dutton, J. A., L. M. Roberts, and J. Bednar(2010), “Pathways for Positive Identity Construction at Work: Four Types of Positive Identity and the Building of Social Resources,” Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 265-293. [https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.48463334]
  • Dutton, J. E., and J. M. Dukerich(1991), “Keeping an Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity in Organizational Adaptation,” Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517-54. [https://doi.org/10.2307/256405]
  • Dutton, J. E., J. M. Dukerich, and C. V. Harquail (1994), “Organizational Images and Membership Commitment,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2393235]
  • Erdogan, B., R. C. Liden, and M. L. Kraimer(2006), “Justice and Leader-Member Exchange: The Moderating Role of Organizational Culture,” Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 395-406. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20786086]
  • Ferris, D. L., H. Lian, D. J. Brown, F. X. Pang, and L. M. Keeping(2010), “Self-Esteem and Job Performance: The Moderating Role of Self-Esteem Contingencies,” Personnel psychology, 63, 561-593. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01181.x]
  • Fiol, C. M., M. J. Hatch, and K. Golden-Biddle (1998), “Organizational Culture and Identity: What's the Difference Anyway?,” In D. A. Whetten, and P. Godfrey (Eds.). Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 56-62.
  • Fisher, C. D.(1986), “Organizational Socialization: An Integrative Review,” Research in personel and human resources management, 4, 101-145.
  • Gecas, V.(1982), “The Self-Concept,” Annual review of sociology, 1-33. [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.000245]
  • Gioia, D. A., and J. B. Thomas(1996), “Identity, Image, and Issue Interpretation: Sensemaking during Strategic Change in Academia,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 370-403. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2393936]
  • Gioia, D. A., M. Schultz, and Corley, K. G(2000), “Organizational Identity, Image, and Adaptive Instability,” Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63-81. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791603]
  • Gist, M. E., and T. R. Mitchell(1992), “Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of its Determinants and Malleability,” Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1992.4279530]
  • Golden-Biddle, K., and H. Rao(1997), “Breaches in the Boardroom: Organizational Identity and Conflicts of Commitment in a Nonprofit Organization,” Organization Science, 8, 593-611. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.6.593]
  • Griffin, A. E. C., A. Colella, and S. Goparaju(2000), “Newcomer and Organizational Socialization Tactics: An Interactionist Perspective,” Human Resource Management Review, 10(4), 453-474. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(00)00036-X]
  • Gruman, J. A., A. M. Saks, and D. I. Zweig(2006), “Organizational Socialization Tactics and Newcomer Proactive Behaviors: An Integrative Study,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 90-04. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.03.001]
  • Hatch, M. J.(1993), “The Dynamics of Organizational Culture,” Academy of Management Review,“ 18(4), 657-693. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.9402210154]
  • Hatch, M. J., and M. Schultz(2002), “The Dynamics of Organizational Identity,” Human Relations, 55, 989-1018. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702055008181]
  • Hatch, M. J., and M. Schultz(2004), “Introduction,” In M. J. Hatch and M. Schultz (Ed.), Organizational Identity: A Reader, New York: Oxford University Press, 1-15.
  • He, H., and Y. Baruch(2009), “Transforming Organizational Identity under Institutional Change,” Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(6), 575-599. [https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810910997014]
  • Hogg, M. A., and S. A. Reid(2006), “Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms,” Communication Theory, 16, 7-30. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x]
  • Hogg, M. A., and D. J. Terry(2000), “Social Identity and Self Categorization Processes in Or ganizational Contexts,” Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791606]
  • Hogg, M. A., and D. J. Terry(2001), “Social Identity Theory and Organizational Processes,” In M. A. Hogg, and D. J. Terry (Eds.). Social Identity Process in Organizational Contexts, NY: Taylor & Francis Group, 1-12.
  • James, L. R.(1982), “Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219-229. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.2.219]
  • Jones, G. R.(1986), “Socialization Tactics, Self-Efficacy, and Newcomers' Adjustments to Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal, 29, 262-279. [https://doi.org/10.5465/256188]
  • Kennedy, S. Y., and J. B. Smith(2013), “The Relationship between School Collective Reflective Practice and Teacher Physiological Efficacy Sources,” Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 132-143. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.09.003]
  • Korman, A. K.(1971), “Organizational Achievement, Aggression and Creativity: Some Suggestions toward an Integrated Theory,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6(5), 593-613. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5073(71)80009-0]
  • Kraimer, M. L.(1997), “Organizational Goals and Values: A Socialization Model,” Human Resource Management Review, 7(4), 425-447. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(97)90028-0]
  • Lalonde, C.(2010), “Organisational Socialization in a Crisis Context,” Disasters, 34(2), 360-379. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01133.x]
  • Liu, J., C. Hui, C. Lee, and Z. X. Chen(2013), “Why Do I Feel Valued and Why Do I Contribute? A Relational Approach to Employee's Organization-Based Self-Esteem and Job Performance,” Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1018-1040. [https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12037]
  • Lu, S. C., and D. Tjosvold(2013), “Socialization Tactics: Antecedents for Goal Interdependence and Newcomer Adjustment and Retention,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83, 245-254. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.05.002]
  • Mcallister, D. J., and G. A. Bigley(2002), “Work Context and the Definition of Self: How Organizational Care Influences Organizational-Based Self-Esteem,” Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 894-904. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3069320]
  • McClaren, N., S. Adam, and A. Vocino(2010), “Investigating Socialization, Work-Related Norms, and the Ethical Perceptions of Marketing Practitioners,” Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 95-115. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0451-z]
  • Morrison, E. W.(2002), “Newcomers' Relationships: The Role of Social Network Ties during Socialization,” Academy of management Journal, 45(6), 1149-1160. [https://doi.org/10.5465/3069430]
  • Nishii, L. H., D. P. Lepak, and B. Schneider(2008), “Employee Attributions of the “Why” ” of HR Practices: Their Effects on Employee Attitudes and Behaviors, and Customer Satisfaction,” Personnel Psychology, 61, 503-545. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00121.x]
  • Pierce J. L., D. G. Gardner, R. B. Dunham, and L. L. Cummings(1993), “Moderation by Organization Based Self-Esteem of Role Condition Employee Response Relationships,” Academy of Management Journal, 36, 271-288. [https://doi.org/10.5465/256523]
  • Pierce, J. L., D. G. Gardner, L. L. Cummings, and R. B. Dunham(1989), “Organization-Based Self-Esteem: Construct Definition, Measurement, and Validation,” Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 622-648. [https://doi.org/10.2307/256437]
  • Pierce, J. L., and D. G. Gardner(2004), “Self-Esteem within the Work and Organizational Context: A Review of the Organization-Based Self-Esteem Literature,” Journal of management, 30(5), 591-622. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.10.001]
  • Porter, M. E., and M. R. Kramer(2011), “The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value,” Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 2.
  • Pratt, M. G., and P. O. Foreman(2000), “Classifying Managerial Responses to Multiple Organizational Identities,” Academy of Management Review, 25, 18-42. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791601]
  • Pratt, M. G(2001), “Social Identity Dynamics in Modern Organization: An Organizational Psychology/Organizational Behavior Perspective,” In M. A. Hogg, and D. J. Terry(Eds.). Social Identity Process in Organizational Contexts, NY: Taylor & Francis Group, 13-30.
  • Ravasi, D., and P. Phillips(2011), “Strategies of Alignment Organizational Identity Management and Strategic Change at Bang and Olufsen,” Strategic Organization, 9(2), 103-135. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127011403453]
  • Ravasi, D., and M. Schultz(2006), “Responding to Organizational Identity Threats: Exploring the Role of Organizational Culture,” Academy of Management Journal, 49, 433-458. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794663]
  • Reichers, A. E.(1987), “An Interactionist Perspective on Newcomer Socialization Rates,” Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 278-287. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4307838]
  • Rindova, V. P., and C. J. Fombrun(1998), “The Eye of the Beholder: The Role of Corporate Reputation in Defining Organizational Identity,” In D. A. Whetten, and P. Godfrey (Eds.). Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 62-82.
  • Tajfel, H.(1982), “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations,” Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39. [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245]
  • Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner(1985), “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior,” In S. Worchel and W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (2nd ed.), Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 7-24.
  • Tobin, T. J., R. O. Muller, and L. M. Turner(2006), “Organizational Learning and Climate as Predictors of Self-Efficacy,” Social Psychology of Education, 9(3), 301-319. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-005-4790-z]
  • Van Knippenberg, D., and M. A. Hogg(2003), “A Social Identity model of Leadership Effectiveness in Organizations,” In R. M. Kramer, and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 245-297 [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25006-1]
  • Van Maanen, J., and E. H. Schein(1979), “Toward a Theory of Organizational Socialization,” In B.M. Staw (Ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 209-264.
  • Weick, K. E.(1995), Sensemaking in Organizations (Vol. 3), Sage.
  • Whetten, D. A., and A. Mackey(2002), “A Social Actor Conception of Organizational Identity and Its Implications for the Study of Organizational Reputation,” Business and Society, 41, 393-414. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650302238775]
  • Wu, W., F. Tang, X. Dong, and C. Liu(2015), “Different Identifications Cause Different Types of Voice: A Role Identity Approach to the Relations between Organizational Socialization and Voice,” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32, 251-287. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9384-x]

• 저자 장용선은 고려대학교에서 경영학 박사를 받았고, 현재 조선대학교 경영학부 부교수로 재직 중이다. 주요 연구분야는 조직문화, 조직정체성, 양면성조직이다.

• 저자 조대환은 조선대학교에서 경영학 박사를 취득하였고, 현재 조선대학교 초빙객원교수로 재직 중이다. 주요 연구분야는 조직정체성 및 조직동일시이다.