Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Korean Academic Society of Business Administration
[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 47, No. 2, pp.481-503
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Apr 2018
Received 16 Nov 2017 Revised 21 Feb 2018 Accepted 13 Mar 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2018.47.2.481

학습을 통한 글로벌 마인드셋의 함양에 대한 실증연구

박용석* ; 수몬이**
*(주저자) 연세대학교 경영대학 교수 yspak@yonsei.ac.kr
**(교신저자) 연세대학교 경영대학 박사과정 sumon1989@gmail.com
An Empirical Study on the Development of Global Mindset Through Learning
Yong Suhk Pak* ; Mon Yee Hsu**
*Professor, School of Business, Yonsei University, First Author
**Doctoral Student, School of Business, Yonsei University, Corresponding Author

초록

본 연구는 한국 국제경영 분야에서는 다뤄진 적이 없는 글로벌 마인드셋과 그에 관한 함양을 살펴보는 데에 목적을 두고 있다. 이를 위해, 우선 글로벌 마인드셋의 개념을 살펴본 후 글로벌 마인드셋이 변화되기 어려운 정적인 상태인지 혹은 변화 가능한 동적인 역량인지에 대한 실증분석을 실시하였다. 실증분석을 위해, 학부생 269명을 대상으로 한 설문조사를 설계하였다. 학부생들이 한 학기 동안 글로벌 마인드셋을 함양할 수 있는 국제경영 관련 분야 수업을 들은 후 이들의 글로벌 마인드셋을 구성하는 인지, 기량과 태도의 수준이 변화하는지를 분석하기 위해 대응표본 t-검정을 실시하여 비교 분석을 하였다. 분석결과, 인지와 기량의 수준이 수업 전보다 수업 후에 증가한 것으로 나타난 반면, 태도 수준은 수업 전후 유의한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 추가로 본 연구는 글로벌 동기부여의 조절효과를 분석하기 위해, 글로벌 동기부여가 높은 집단과 낮은 집단을 나누어 하위집단 분석(subgroup analysis)을 실시하였다. 분석결과, 글로벌 동기부여가 높은 집단에서 수업 후 글로벌 마인드셋 수준이 증가한 것으로 나타났으나 글로벌 동기부여가 낮은 집단에서는 수업 전후 글로벌 마인드셋 수준에 유의한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타나, 글로벌 동기부여의 긍정적 조절효과가 밝혀졌다. 또한, 본 연구는 해외경험의 조절효과를 분석하기 위해, 해외체류기간이 1년 이상인 집단과 1년 이하인 집단을 나누어서 집단 비교 분석을 실시하였다. 분석결과, 해외체류기간이 1년 이상인 집단에서 수업 후 글로벌 마인드셋 수준이 향상된 결과가 보였고, 1년 이하인 집단에서는 유의한 차이가 발견되지 않아 해외경험의 긍정적 조절효과가 확인되었다. 기존의 한국 국제경영 학계에서는 다뤄진 적이 없는 글로벌 마인드셋 연구와 관련하여 결과를 정리하고, 앞으로 추가적인 연구주제를 제시하여 본 연구를 마무리하였다.

Abstract

This study aims to examine the development of global mindset, which is rarely addressed in a Korean international business journal. We investigate whether the global mindset is a static state that is difficult to change or a dynamically changeable competence. Based on the global mindset literature, we categorize the global mindset into three dimensions - cognition, skills and attitudes - and analyze the nature (static or dynamic) of each dimension. We collect survey questions from 269 undergraduate students. We use paired sample t-tests to analyze whether the undergraduates have changed their global mindsets in terms of cognition, skills and attitudes after taking the international business class during a semester.

Results reveal that the levels of cognition and skills have increased after the class, but the attitude level shows no significant difference before and after the class. The results also show that overall global mindsets after the class become higher than before the class. We also find the positive moderating effects of global motivation and international experience on the relationship between the international business class and the global mindset. It means that the effectiveness of international business class on the global mindset is strengthened with the high levels of global motivation and international experience. After the conclusion, we suggest future research topics related to the global mindset which have been rarely addressed in the field of the Korean international business academy.

Keywords:

Global Mindsets, Cognition, Skills, Attitudes, Global Motivation, International Experience

키워드:

글로벌 마인드셋, 인지, 기량, 태도, 글로벌 동기부여, 해외경험

References

  • Adler, N. J., and S. Bartholomew(1992), “Managing Globally Competent People,” The Executive, 6(3), 52-65. [https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1992.4274189]
  • Andresen, M., and F. Bergdolt(2017), “A Systematic Literature Review on the Definitions of Global Mindset and Cultural Intelligence-Merging Two Different Research Streams,” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 170-195. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1243568]
  • Arnold, H. J.(1982), “Moderator Variables: A Clarification of Conceptual, Analytic, and Psychometric Issues,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29(2), 143-174. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(82)90254-9]
  • Arora, A., A. Jaju, A. G. Kefalas, and T. Perenich (2004), “An Exploratory Analysis of Global Managerial Mindsets: A Case of U.S. Textile and Apparel Industry,” Journal of International Management, 10(3), 393-411. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2004.05.001]
  • Barlett, C. A., and S. Ghoshal(1990), “Matrix Management: Not A Structure, A Frame of Mind,” Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 138-145.
  • Bauer, K. N., K. A. Orvis, K. Ely, and E. A. Surface(2016), “Re-examination of Motivation in Learning Contexts: Meta-analytically Investigating the Role Type of Motivation Plays in the Prediction of Key Training Outcomes,” Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(1), 33-50. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9401-1]
  • Beck, A. T., R. A. Steer, R. Ball, and W. F. Ranieri (1996), “Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories-IA and -II in Psychiatric Outpatients,” Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(3), 588-597. [https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13]
  • Bowen, D. E., and A. C. Inkpen(2009), “Exploring the Role of 'Global Mindset' in Leading Change in International Contexts,” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45(2), 239-260. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886309334149]
  • Brislin, R. W.(1970), “Back-translation for Cross-cultural Research,” Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216. [https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301]
  • Chen, G., B. L. Kirkman, K. Kim, C. I. Farh, and S. Tangirala(2010), “When Does Cross-cultural Motivation Enhance Expatriate Effectiveness? A Multilevel Investigation of the Moderating Roles of Subsidiary Support and Cultural Distance,” Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1110-1130. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533217]
  • Clapp-Smith, R., and G. V. Lester(2014), “Defining the ‘Mindset’ in Global Mindset: Modeling the Dualities of Global Leadership,” in Advances in Global Leadership, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 205-228. [https://doi.org/10.1108/S1535-1203_2014_0000008017]
  • Cliffe, S.(2015), “Companies Don’t Go Global, People Do,” Harvard Business Review, 82-85.
  • Colquitt, J. A., J. A. LePine, and R. A. Noe(2000), “Toward An Integrative Theory of Training Motivation: A Meta-analytic Path Analysis of 20 Years of Research,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 678-707. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678]
  • Dale, H. S.(1991), Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, New York: Macmillan.
  • Deci, E. L., J. P. Connell, and R. M. Ryan(1989), “Self-determination in A Work Organization,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580-590. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580]
  • Ertmer, P. A., and T. J. Newby (1993), “Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features from An Instructional Design Perspective,” Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50-72. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.1993.tb00605.x]
  • Flavell, J. H.(1979), “Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive–developmental Inquiry,” American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906]
  • Fodor, J. A., and Z. W. Pylyshyn(1988), “Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis,” Cognition, 28(1), 3-71. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5]
  • Govindarajan, V., and A. K. Gupta(1988), “Success Is All in the Mindset,” Financial Times, February 27, p. 2.
  • Grant, R. M.(1996), “Toward A Knowledge‐based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110]
  • Gupta, A. K., and V. Govindarajan(2002), “Cultivating A Global Mindset,” The Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 116-126. [https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2002.6640211]
  • Hamilton, R., K. D. Vohs, A. L. Sellier, and T. Meyvis (2011), “Being of Two Minds: Switching Mindsets Exhausts Self-regulatory Resources,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1), 13-24. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.005]
  • Harkness, J. A.(2003), “Questionnaire Translation,” in J. A. Harkness, F. J. Van de Vijver, and P. P. Mohler (Eds.), Cross-cultural Survey Methods, Vol.325, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 35-56.
  • Hendrickson, A. R., P. D. Massey, and T. P. Cronan (1993), “On the Test-retest Reliability of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Scales,” MIS Quarterly, 17(2), 227-230. [https://doi.org/10.2307/249803]
  • Javidan, M., and D. Bowen(2013), “The ‘Global Mindset’ of Managers,” Organizational Dynamics, 42(2), 145-55. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2013.03.008]
  • Kedia, B., and A. Mukherji(1999), “Global Managers: Developing A Mindset for Global Competitiveness,” Journal of World Business, 34(3), 230-251. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(99)00017-6]
  • Kefalas, A. G. (1998), “Think Globally, Act Locally,” Thunderbird International Business Review, 40(6), 547-562. [https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6874(199811/12)40:6<547::AID-TIE3>3.0.CO;2-F]
  • Kyndt, E., F. Dochy, K. Struyven, and E. Cascallar (2011), “The Direct and Indirect Effect of Motivation for Learning on Students' Approaches to Learning Through the Perceptions of Workload and Task Complexity,” Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), 135-150. [https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.501329]
  • Lane, H. W.(2009), International Management Behavior: Leading with A Global Mindset, Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.
  • Levy, O., S. Beechler, S. Taylor, and N. A. Boyacigiller (2007), “What We Talk About When We Talk About ‘Global Mindset’: Managerial Cognition in Multinational Corporations,” Journal of International Business Studies, 38(2), 231-58. [https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400265]
  • Lovvorn, A. S., and J. S. Chen(2011), “Developing A Global Mindset: The Relationship Between An International Assignment and Cultural Intelligence,” International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(9), 275-283.
  • Lücke, G., T. Kostova, and K. Roth(2014), “Multiculturalism from A Cognitive Perspective: Patterns and Implications,” Journal of International Business Studies, 45(2), 169-190. [https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.53]
  • Murtha, T. P., S. A. Lenway, and R. P. Bagozzi (1998), “Global Mind-sets and Cognitive Shift in A Complex Multinational Corporation,” Strategic Management Journal, 19(2), 97-114. [https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199802)19:2<97::AID-SMJ943>3.0.CO;2-2]
  • Na, E. Y.(1999), “Is Biased Processing of Strong Attitudes Peripheral? An Extension of the Dual Process Models of Attitude Change,” Psychological Reports, 85(2), 589-605. [https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1999.85.2.589]
  • Nummela, N., S. Saarenketo, and K. Puumalainen (2004), “A Global Mindset: A Prerequisite for Successful Internationalization?,” Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 21(1), 51-64. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2004.tb00322.x]
  • Olson, M. A., and R. H. Fazio(2001), “Implicit Attitude Formation through Classical Conditioning,” Psychological Science, 12(5), 413-417. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00376]
  • Pavlov, I. P.(1927), Conditional Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex, H. Milford.
  • Pavlov, I. P.(1960), Conditional Reflexes, Dover.
  • Reynolds, R. E., G. M. Sinatra, and T. L. Jetton (1996), “Views of Knowledge Acquisition and Representation: A Continuum from Experience Centered to Mind,” Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 93-104. [https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3102_1]
  • Rhinesmith, S. H.(1992), “Global Mindsets for Global Managers,” Training & Development, 46(10), 63-69.
  • Rhinesmith, S. H.(1995), “Open the Door to A Global Mindset,” Training & Development, 49(5), 35-43.
  • Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci(2000), “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. [https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020]
  • Sarnoff, I.(1960), “Psychoanalytic Theory and Social Attitudes,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 251-279. [https://doi.org/10.1086/266948]
  • Sharma, S., R. M. Durand, and O. Gur-Arie(1981), “Identification and Analysis of Moderator Variables,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 291-300. [https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800303]
  • Siemens, G.(2005), “Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age,” International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.
  • Smith, E. R(1996), “What Do Connectionism and Social Psychology Offer Each Other?,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 893-912. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.893]
  • Story, J. S., and J. E. Barbuto(2011), “Global Mindset: A Construct Clarification and Framework,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18(3), 377-384. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811404421]
  • Story, J. S., J. E. Barbuto, F. Lutans, and J. A. Bovarird(2014), “Meeting the Challenges of Effective International HRM: Analysis of the Antecedents of Global Mindset,” Human Resource Management, 53(1), 131-155. [https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21568]
  • Vallerand, R. J.(2000), “Deci and Ryan's Self-determination Theory: A View from the Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation,” Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 312-318.
  • Vuong, Q. H.(2016), “Global Mindset as the Integration of Emerging Socio-cultural Values Through Mindsponge Processes: A Transition Economy Perspective,” in J. Kuada (Ed.), Global Mindsets: Exploration and Perspectives, Routledge, London, UK. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315736396-8]

• 저자 박용석은 현재 연세대학교 경영대학 국제경영 전공 교수로 재직 중이다. 미국 일리노이 대학에서 MBA학위를, 그리고 뉴저지 럿거스 대학에서 국제경영 박사학위를 취득하였다. 한국국제경영학회 학술지인 <국제경영연구> 편집장을 역임하였고, 주요연구분야는 인수합병후 통합과정, 국제합작투자회사에서의 지식경영 및 글로벌 마인드셋 등이다.

• 저자 수몬이는 현재 연세대학교 경영대학 국제경영 박사과정에 재학 중이다. 주요연구분야는 국제인적자원관리, 글로벌 마인드셋 및 국제경영전략 등이다.