Korean Academic Society of Business Administration
[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 49, No. 1, pp.183-214
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 29 Feb 2020
Received 22 May 2019 Revised 27 Nov 2019 Accepted 17 Dec 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2020.49.1.183

The Determinants of Pay-for-Performance Sensitivity and Convexity of CEO Bonus Contracts: Evidence from S&P 1500 Firms

Sewon Kwon* ; Natalie Kyung Won Kim** ; Jae Yong Shin*** ; Sun-Moon Jung****
*(First Author) Sejong University k4js1@sejong.ac.kr
**(Corresponding Author) Seoul National University midzh21@snu.ac.kr
***(Co-Author) Seoul National University jshin@snu.ac.kr
****(Co-Author) Seoul National University sunmoonj22@snu.ac.kr
최고경영자 성과급의 성과-보수 민감도 결정요인에 대한 연구: 미국 S&P 1500기업을 중심으로
권세원* ; 김경원** ; 신재용*** ; 정선문****
*세종대학교, 주저자
**서울대학교 박사과정, 교신저자
***서울대학교, 공저자
****서울대학교 박사과정, 공저자

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that CEO’s annual bonus plans have an incentive effect comparable to stock compensation (Frydman and Jenter, 2010; Jensen and Murphy, 2011; Guay, Kepler, and Tsui, 2019). However, only a limited number of papers have addressed annual bonuses of CEOs. The aim of this paper is 1) to overview the comprehensive landscape of executive bonus plans 2) and to investigate the determinants of pay-for-performance sensitivity (hereafter, “PPS”) and the convexity in annual bonuses. We find that the 80/120% rule for target setting for annual bonus plans holds on average, with some differences across industries. We also show that firms’ growth opportunities are one of the key elements in determining bonus PPS and the convexity of bonus payouts after controlling for peer firm information and other economic factors.

초록

본 연구는 최고경영자 성과급에 대한 전반적인 특성을 분석하고 그 중에서 성과-보수 민감도(Pay-for-Performance Sensitivity, “PPS”)의 결정 요인을 집중적으로 살펴보고자 한다. 최근 연구에 따르면 최고경영자의 성과급은 주식기준 보상에 준하는 유인 효과를 지닌 것으로 나타났다(Frydman and Jenter, 2010; Jensen and Murphy, 2011; Guay, Kepler, and Tsui, 2019). 그럼에도 불구하고 최고경영자의 성과급에 대한 연구가 부족한 실정이다. 미국 S&P 1500기업의 2008년부터 2014년까지 경영자 성과급 보수계약을 분석한 결과, 산업별로 차이는 있지만, 기업들이 대체로 성과급 목표 설정에 80/120% 원칙을 사용하는 것으로 나타났다. 아울러 인접 기업(peer firms)들과 기타 경제적 요인들을 통제한 후에는 기업의 성장성이 성과급의 성과-보수 민감도(pay-for-performance sensitivity)와 성과-보수 민감도의 볼록성(convexity)의 핵심적인 결정요인으로 나타났다.

Keywords:

annual bonus plans, pay-for-performance sensitivity, convexity, executive compensation

키워드:

경영자 성과급, 성과-보수 민감도, 볼록성, 최고경영자 보상

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018S1A5A2A02066328). Professor Jae Yong Shin acknowledges financial support from the Institute of Management Research at Seoul National University.

References

  • Albuquerque, A.(2009), “Peer firms in relative performance evaluation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(1), pp.69-89. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.04.001]
  • Amabile, T. M.(1996), Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity, Westview Press, Colorado.
  • Anderson, M., R. Banker, and S. Ravindran(2000), “Executive compensation in the information technology industry,” Management Science, 46(2), pp.530-547. [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.4.530.12055]
  • Aranda, C., J. Arellano, and A. Davila(2014), “Ratcheting and the role of relative target setting,” The Accounting Review, 89(4), pp. 1197-1226. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50733]
  • Armstrong, C., A. Jagolinzer, and D. Larcker(2010), “Chief executive officer equity incentives and accounting irregularities,” Journal of Accounting Research, 48(2), pp.225-271. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00361.x]
  • Arnaiz, O. G., and V. Salas-Fumás(2008), “Performance standards and optimal incentives,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(1), pp. 139-152. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.11.001]
  • Baber, W., S. Janakiraman, and S. Kang(1996), “Investment opportunities and the structure of executive compensation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21, pp.297-318. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(96)00421-1]
  • Banker, R. D., and S. M. Datar(1987), “Sensitivity, precision, and linear aggregation of signals for performance evaluation,” Journal of Accounting Research, 27(1), pp.21-39. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2491205]
  • Bennett, B., J. C. Bettis, R. Gopalan, and T. Milbourn(2015), “Compensation goals and firm performance,” Journal of Financial Economics, 124(2), pp.307-330. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.01.010]
  • Bergstresser, D., and T. Philippon(2006), “CEO incentives and earnings management,” Journal of Financial Economics, 80(3), pp.511-529. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.10.011]
  • Bol, J. C., and J. B. Lill(2015), “Performance target revisions in incentive contracts: Do information and trust reduce ratcheting and the ratchet effect?,” The Accounting Review, 90(5), pp.1755-1778. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51050]
  • Bouwens, J., and P. Kroos(2011), “Target ratcheting and effort reduction,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1), pp.171-185. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.07.002]
  • Burns, N., and S. Kedia(2006), “The impact of performance-based compensation on misreporting,” Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), pp.35-67. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.003]
  • Bushman, R. M., R. J. Indjejikian, and A. Smith (1996), “CEO compensation: The role of individual performance evaluation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(2), pp. 161-193. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(95)00416-5]
  • Cadman, B., S. Klasa, and S. Matsunaga(2010), “Determinants of CEO pay: A comparison of ExecuComp and non-ExecuComp Firms,” The Accounting Review, 85(5), pp.1511-1543. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.5.1511]
  • Cheng, S.(2004), “R&D Expenditures and CEO Compensation,” The Accounting Review, 79 (2), pp.305-328. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.305]
  • Coles, J. L., N. D. Daniel, and L. Naveen(2006), “Managerial Incentives and Risk-Taking,” Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2), pp. 431-468. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.09.004]
  • Core, J., and W. Guay(2002), “Estimating the value of employee stock option portfolios and their sensitivities to price and volatility,” Journal of Accounting Research, 40(3), pp. 613-630. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00064]
  • Core, J., W. Guay, and R. Verrecchia(2003), “Price versus non-price performance measures in optimal CEO compensation contracts,” The Accounting Review, 78(4), pp.957-981. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.4.957]
  • Curtis, A, V. Li, and P. H. Patrick(2019), “The use of adjusted earnings in performance evaluation,” University of Washington. Available at SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=2682652.
  • Dechow, P. M., M. R. Huson, and R. G. Sloan (1994), “The Effect of Restructuring Charges on Executives' Cash Compensation,” The Accounting Review, 69(1), pp.138-156.
  • Dechow, P. M., and R. G. Sloan(1991), “Executive incentives and the horizon problem,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14(1), pp. 51-89. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(91)90058-S]
  • Erickson, M., M. Hanlon, and E. Maydew(2006), “Is there a link between executive equity incentives and accounting fraud?,” Journal of Accounting Research, 44(1), pp.113-143. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00194.x]
  • Frydman, C., and D. Jenter(2010), “CEO compensation,” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2, pp.75-102. [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-120209-133958]
  • Gaver, J., and K. Gaver(1993), “Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16(1-3), pp. 125-160. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(93)90007-3]
  • Gong, G., L. Li, and J. Y. Shin(2011), “Relative performance evaluation and related peer groups in executive compensation contracts,” The Accounting Review, 86(3), pp.1007-1043. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000042]
  • Gormley, T. A, D. A. Matsa, and T. Milbourn(2013), “CEO compensation and corporate risk: Evidence from a natural experiment,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2-3), pp. 79-101. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.08.001]
  • Guay, W.R.(1999), “The sensitivity of CEO wealth to equity risk : an analysis of the magnitude and determinants,” Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), pp.43-71. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00016-1]
  • Guay, W., J. Kepler, and D. Tsui(2019), “The role of executive cash bonuses in providing individual and team incentives,” Journal of Financial Economics, 133(2), pp.441-471. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.02.007]
  • Hall, B., and J. Liebman(1998), “Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats?,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), pp.653-691. [https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555702]
  • Holmstrom, B.(1979), “Moral hazard and observability,” The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), pp. 74-91. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3003320]
  • Humphreys, M. S., and W. Revelle(1984), “Personality, motivation and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing,” Psychological Review, 91(2), pp.153-184. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.2.153]
  • Hyun, J., B. Kim, S. Kwon, and J. Y. Shin(2014), “The effects of corporate governance, competition, and political costs on strategic executive pay disclosure: Evidence from Korea,” Journal of Managerial Accounting Research, 26(2), pp.195-220. [https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50730]
  • Indjejikian, R. J., M. Matějka, K. A. Merchant, and W. A. Van der Stede(2014), “Earnings targets and annual bonus incentives,” The Accounting Review, 89(4), pp.1227-1258. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50732]
  • Indjejikian, R. J., M. Matějka, and J. D. Schloetzer (2014), “Target ratcheting and incentives: Theory, evidence, and new opportunities,” The Accounting Review, 89(4), pp.1259-1267. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50745]
  • Indjejikian, R. J., and D. Nanda(2002), “Executive target bonuses and what they imply about performance standards,” The Accounting Review, 77(4), pp.793-819. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.793]
  • Ittner, C. D., R. A. Lambert, and D. F. Larcker (2003), “The structure and performance consequences of equity grants to employees of new economy firms,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34(1-3), pp.89-127. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00088-5]
  • Ittner, C. D., D. F. Larcker, and M. V. Rajan (1997), “The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts,” The Accounting Review, 72(2), pp.231-255.
  • Jensen, M. C., and K. J. Murphy(1990), “Performance pay and top-management incentives,” Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), pp.225-264. [https://doi.org/10.1086/261677]
  • Jensen, M. C. and K. J. Murphy(2011), “CEO bonus plans: and how to fix them,” Working Paper. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper 12-022; Marshall School of Business Working Paper No. FBE 02-11. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=1935654 or http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2139/ssrn.1935654
  • Kim, S. Y., and J. Y. Shin(2017), “Executive bonus target ratcheting: Evidence from the new executive compensation disclosure rules,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(4), pp.1843-1879. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12350]
  • Lambert, R. A., and D. F. Larcker(1987), “An analysis of the use of accounting and market measures of performance in executive compensation contracts,” Journal of Accounting Research, 25(Supplement), pp.85-125. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2491081]
  • Laux, V.(2014), “Pay convexity, earnings manipulation, and project continuation,” The Accounting Review, 89(6), pp.2233-2259. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50843]
  • Lee, C. J., L. Y. Li, and H. Yue(2006), “Performance, growth and earnings management,” Review of Accounting Studies, 11(2), pp.305-334. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-006-9009-9]
  • Leone, A. J., and S. Rock(2002), “Empirical tests of budget ratcheting and its effect on managers’ discretionary accrual choices,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33 (1), pp.43-67. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00044-1]
  • McNichols, M. F.(2000), “Research design issues in earnings management studies,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19(4-5), pp. 313-345. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(00)00018-1]
  • Merchant, K. A., and W. A. Van der Stede(2012), Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives, 3rd edition, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
  • Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts(1992), Economics, Organization and Management, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  • Murphy, K. J.(1999), “Executive Compensation,” in Handbook of Labor Economics, 3, pp.2485-2563. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463(99)30024-9]
  • Murphy, K. J.(2001), “Performance standards in incentive contracts,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), pp.245-278. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00013-1]
  • Myers, S. C.(1977), “Determinants of corporate borrowing,” Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), pp.147-175. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0]
  • Park, H. and D. Vrettos(2015), “The moderating effect of relative performance evaluation on the risk incentive properties of executives’ equity portfolios,” Journal of Accounting Research, 53(5), pp.1055-1108. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12092]
  • Pittman, T. S., J. Emery, and A. K. Boggiano(1982), “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations: Reward-induced changes in preference for complexity,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(5), pp.789-797. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.5.789]
  • Roychowdhury, S.(2006), “Earnings management through real activities manipulation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), pp. 335-370. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.01.002]
  • Shapira, Z.(1976), “Expectancy determinants of intrinsically motivated behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(6), pp.1235-1244. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.6.1235]
  • Sloan, R. G.(1993), “Accounting earnings and top executive compensation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16(1-3), pp.55-100. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(93)90005-Z]
  • Smith, C. W. and R. M. Stulz(1985), “The determinants of firms' hedging policies,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20 (4), pp.391-405. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2330757]
  • Smith, C. W., and R. L. Watts(1992), “The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies,” Journal of Financial Economics, 32(3), pp.263-292. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(92)90029-W]
  • Tirole, J.(1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization, MIT Press, Massachusetts.
  • Webb, R. A, M. G. Williamson, and Y. Zhang(2013), “Productivity-target difficulty, target-based pay, and outside-the-box thinking,” The Accounting Review, 88(4), pp.1433-1457. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50436]
  • Wood, R. E., A. J. Mento, and E. A. Locke(1987), “Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), pp.416-425. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.416]

• 저자 권세원은 현재 세종대학교 경영대학 회계학 전공 조교수로 재직 중이다. 서울대학교 경영학과를 졸업하고, 동 대학원에서 경영학 석사 및 박사를 취득하였으며, 공인회계사 자격 취득 후 삼일회계법인에서 약 4년가량 회계감사를 담당하였다. 주요연구분야는 경영진의 성과보상, 기업지배구조, Accrual anomaly 등이다.

• 저자 김경원은 현재 서울대학교 경영대학 경영학과 회계학 박사과정에 재학 중이다. 서울대학교 경영학과 및 동 대학원에서 경영학 석사를 취득하였으며, LG전자에서 4년 근무하였다. 주요연구분야는 경영진의 성과보상, 기업지배구조, 보상철학 등이다.

• 저자 신재용은 현재 서울대학교 경영대학 경영학과 회계학 교수로 재직 중이다. 서울대학교 경영학과를 졸업하고 동 대학원에서 석사학위를 취득하였다. 이후 KISDI에서 근무 후 미국 위스컨신 매디슨 대학교 대학원에서 경영학 박사를 취득하였다. 2010년에는 미국회계학회 관리회계분과, “가장 영향력 있는 논문상”을 수상하였으며, 2014년부터 삼일회계법인 저명교수를 역임하였다. 주요연구분야는 경영진의 성과 보상, 상대평가제도, 기업지배구조 등이다.

• 저자 정선문은 현재 서울대학교 경영대학 경영학과 회계학 박사과정에 재학중이다. 고려대학교에서 미술학사 및 경영학사를 취득하였으며, 서울대학교 경영학과에서 경영학 석사를 취득하였다. 주요 연구분야는 성과측정, 인센티브계약, 기업지배구조, 경영자보상, 정부예산 등이다.