Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Korean Academic Society of Business Administration
[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 49, No. 1, pp.75-101
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 29 Feb 2020
Received 09 Oct 2019 Accepted 27 Oct 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2020.49.1.75

Who will be a Better Change Leader?: Schema-Based Leadership Perception on Followers’ Commitment to Change

Eunyoung Lee* ; Bongsoon Cho**
*(First Author) Sogang University, Graduate School of Business eylee@sogang.ac.kr
**(Corresponding Author) Sogang University, Graduate School of Business bcho@sogang.ac.kr
스키마기반 리더십 지각이 부하의 변화 몰입에 미치는 영향
이은영* ; 조봉순**
*서강대학교 경영전문대학원 박사수료, 주저자
**서강대학교 경영학부 교수, 교신저자

Abstract

We tested the effect of followers' perceived leadership schema congruence on leadership effectiveness in the organizational change context. Drawing on literature from implicit leadership theories (ILT) and social identity perspectives, we predicted that schema-based leadership perceptions - followers' perceived ILT congruence and leader's group prototypicality - explain leadership effectiveness, as measured by follower' commitment to change. We also investigated possible moderators, namely, followers' organizational identification and perceived uncertainty to change. Result of survey study (n=189) on employees of Korean firms supported our research prediction. ILT congruence and leader's group prototypicality were positively related to followers' commitment to change. Moreover, organizational identification positively moderated the effect of leader's group prototypicality on commitment to change. Meanwhile, perceived uncertainty to change showed negative moderation in ILT congruence but positive moderation in leader's group prototypicality, which can be expected from social cognition literature and social identity literature, respectively. Implications for further studies are also discussed.

초록

본 연구는 부하가 지각한 리더의 리더십 스키마 일치성(leadership schema congruence)이 부하의 변화 몰입에 미치는 영향을 탐색하였다. 암묵적 리더십 이론(Implicit leadership theory) 논의와 리더십 사회정체성 이론(Social identity theory of leadership)에 의거하여 본 연구는 부하가 지각한 리더의 암묵적 리더십(ILT) 일치도와 리더의 집단 전형성(group prototypicality)이 부하의 변화몰입과 정적으로 연관되며, 부하의 조직 동일시 수준과 변화 불확실성이 해당 관계를 조절할 것으로 예측하였다. 실증을 위해, 국내 기업에 재직하는 직원을 대상으로 설문을 수집하였으며(n=189), 회귀분석을 통해 연구문제를 검증하였다. 분석 결과, 부하가 지각한 CEO의 암묵적 리더십 일치도와 집단 전형성은 이들의 변화 몰입에 정적으로 관련되었으며, 부하의 조직 동일시 수준은 집단 전형성 지각과 변화몰입간의 관계를 긍정적으로 조절하였다. 변화 불확실성은 암묵적 리더십 일치도와 변화 몰입간의 관계를 부정적으로 조절한 반면 집단 전형성과 변화 몰입간의 관계는 긍정적으로 조절하였다. 그리고 학문적 및 실무적 시사점을 논의하였다.

Keywords:

Implicit leadership theories, Prototypicality, Leadership, Social identity theory, Organizational identification, Commitment to change

키워드:

암묵적 리더십 이론, 전형성, 사회정체성 이론, 조직 동일시, 변화 몰입

References

  • Albert, S., B. E. Ashforth, and J. E. Dutton(2000), “Organizational Identity and Identification: Charting New Waters and Building New Bridges,” Academy of Management Review, 25(1), pp.13-17. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791600]
  • Allen, J., N. L. Jimmieson, P. Bordia, and B. E. Irmer(2007), “Uncertainty during Organizational Change: Managing Perceptions through Communication,” Journal of Change Management, 7(2), pp.187-210. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010701563379]
  • Ashforth, B. E. and F. Mael(1989), “Social Identity Theory and the Organization,” Academy of Management Review, 14(1), pp.20-39. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999]
  • Bligh, M. C.(2014), “Followership and Follower-Centered Approaches,” in B. Shamir (Ed.), Emerging Approaches to Leadership, London, SAGE, pp.425-436.
  • Bordia, P., E. Hunt, N. Paulsen, N. Tourish, and N. DiFonzo(2004), “Uncertainty during Organizational Change: Is It All about Control?,” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(3), pp.345-365. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320444000128]
  • Braun, S., C. Peus, and D. Frey(2018), “Connectionism in Action: Exploring the Links between Leader Prototypes, Leader Gender, and Perceptions of Authentic Leadership,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 149, pp.129-144. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.10.003]
  • Cho, B., D. Lee, and K. Kim(2014), “How Does Relative Deprivation Influence Employee Intention to Leave a Merged Company? the Role of Organizational Identification,” Human Resource Management, 53(3), pp.421-443. [https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21580]
  • Cicero, L., M. Bonaiuto, A. Pierro, and D. Van Knippenberg(2008), “Employees’ Work Effort as a Function of Leader Group Prototypicality: The Moderating Role of Team Identification,” European Review of Applied Psychology, 58(2), pp.117-124. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2007.01.001]
  • Cicero, L., A. Pierro, and D. van Knippenberg (2007), “Leader Group Prototypicality and Job Satisfaction: The Moderating Role of Job Stress and Team Identification,” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11(3), pp.165-175. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.11.3.165]
  • Cicero, L., A. Pierro, and D. Van Knippenberg (2010), “Leadership and Uncertainty: How Role Ambiguity Affects the Relationship Between Leader Group Prototypicality and Leadership Effectiveness,” British Journal of Management, 21(2), pp.411-421. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00648.x]
  • Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken (2003), Applied Multiple Regression/ Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
  • Cronshaw, S. F. and R. G. Lord(1987), “Effects of Categorization, Attribution, and Encoding Processes on Leadership Perceptions,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(1), 97-106. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.1.97]
  • Edwards, J. R.(1994), “The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(1), pp. 51-100. [https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1029]
  • Eilam, G. and B. Shamir(2005), “Organizational Change and Self-concept Threats: A Theoretical Perspective and a Case Study,” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(4), pp. 399-421. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886305280865]
  • Eisenbach, R., K Watson, and R. Pillai(1999), “Transformational Leadership in the Context of Organizational Change,” Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(2), 80-89. [https://doi.org/10.1108/09534819910263631]
  • Ellemers, N., P. Kortekaas, and J. W. Ouwerkerk (1999), “Self-categorisation, Commitment to the Group and Group Self-esteem as Related but Distinct Aspects of Social Identity,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 29 (2), pp.371-389. [https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<371::AID-EJSP932>3.0.CO;2-U]
  • Ensari, N., and S. E. Murphy(2003), “Cross-cultural Variations in Leadership Perceptions and Attribution of Charisma to the Leader,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92(1–2), pp.52-66. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00066-9]
  • Epitropaki, O. and R. Martin(2005), “From Ideal to Real: A Longitudinal Study of the Role of Implicit Leadership Theories on Leadermember Exchanges and Employee outcomes,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), pp. 659-676. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.659]
  • Epitropaki, O., T. Sy, R. Martin, S. Tram-Quon, and A. Topakas(2013), “Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories “in the Wild”: Taking Stock of Information-Processing Approaches to Leadership and Followership in Organizational Settings,” The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), pp.858-881. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.005]
  • Fedor, D. B., S. Caldewell, and D. M. Herold(2006), “The Effects of Organizational Changes on Employee Commitment: A Multilevel Investigation,” Personnel Psychology, 59(1), pp. 1-29. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00852.x]
  • Fiske, S. T. and S. E. Taylor(2013), Social Cognition : From Brains to Culture, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
  • Fraser, Scott L. and R. G. Lord(1988), “Stimulus Prototypicality and General Leadership Impressions: Their Role in Leadership and Behavioral Ratings,” The Journal of Psychology, 122(3), pp.291-303. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1988.9915517]
  • Gaertner, S. L. and J. F. Dovidio(2000), Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model, Psychology Press, Philadelphia.
  • Gardner, W. L., B. J. Avolio, F. Luthans, D. R. May, and F. Walumbwa(2005), “‘Can You see the Real Me?’ A Self-based Model of Authentic Leader and Follower Development,” The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), pp.343-372. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003]
  • Giessner, S. R., D. van Knippenberg, W. van Ginkel, and E. Sleebos(2013), “Team-oriented Leadership: The Interactive Effects of Leader Group Prototypicality, Accountability, and Team Identification,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), pp.658-667. [https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032445]
  • Giessner, S. R., D. van Knippenberg, and E. Sleebos (2009), “License to Fail? How Leader Group Prototypicality Moderates the Effects of Leader Performance on Perceptions of Leadership Effectiveness,” The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), pp.434-451. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.012]
  • Halevy, N., Y. Berson, & A. D. Galinsky(2011), “The Mainstream is Not Electable: When Vision Triumphs over Representativeness in Leader Emergence and Effectiveness,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 893-904. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211402836]
  • Hollander, E. P(1958), “Conformity, Status, and Idiosyncrasy Credit,” Psychological Review, 65(2), 117-127. [https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042501]
  • Haslam, S. A.(2004), Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach(2nd ed.). Sage, London.
  • Haslam, S. A., T. Postmes, and N. Ellemers(2003), “More Than a Metaphor: Organizational Identity Makes Organizational Life Possible,” British Journal of Management, 14(4), pp. 357-369. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2003.00384.x]
  • Herold, D. M., D. B. Fedor, and S. D. Caldwell (2006), “Beyond Change Management: A Multilevel Investigation of Contextual and Personal Influences on Employees’ Commitment to Change,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), pp.942-951. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.942]
  • Herold, D. M., D. B. Fedor, S. Caldwell, and Y. Liu(2008), “The Effects of Transformational and Change leadership on Employees' Commitment to a Change: A multilevel Study,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), pp. 346-357. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.346]
  • Herscovitch, L. and J. P. Meyer(2002), “Commitment to Organizational Change: Extension of a Three-component Model,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), pp.474-487. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.474]
  • Hirst, G., R. van Dick, and D. van Knippenberg (2009), “A Social Identity Perspective on Leadership and Employee Creativity,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), pp.963-982. [https://doi.org/10.1002/job.600]
  • Hogg, M. A.(2001), “A Social Identity Theory of Leadership,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), pp.184-200. [https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1]
  • Hogg, M. A.(2009), “Managing Self-uncertainty through Group Identification,” Psychological Inquiry, 20(4), pp.221-224. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903333452]
  • Hogg, M. A.(2012), “Uncertainty-identity Theory,” in P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski and E. Tory Higgins(Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, Thousands Oakes, Sage, pp.66-87.
  • Hogg, M. A. and S. C Hains(1996), “Intergroup Relations and Group Solidarity: Effects of Group Identification and Social beliefs on Depersonalized Attraction,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), pp. 295-309. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.295]
  • Hogg, M. A. and D. J. Terry(2000), “Social Identity and Self-categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts,” Academy of Management Review, 25(1), pp.121-140. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791606]
  • Hogg, M. A. and D. van Knippenberg(2003), “Social Identity and Leadership Processes in Groups,” in M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, San Diego, Academic Press, 35, pp.1-52. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(03)01001-3]
  • Hogg, M. A., S. C. Hains, and I. Mason(1998), “Identification and Leadership in Small Groups: Salience, Frame of Reference, and Leader Stereotypicality Effects on Leader Evaluations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), pp.1248-1263. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1248]
  • Hogg, M. A., D. van Knippenberg, and D. E. Rast III(2012a), “Intergroup Leadership in Organizations: Leading Across Group and Organizational Boundaries,” Academy of Management Review, 37(2), pp.232-255. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0221]
  • Hogg, M. A., D. van Knippenberg, and D. E. Rast III(2012b), “The Social Identity Theory of Leadership: Theoretical Origins, Research Findings, and Conceptual Developments,” European Review of Social Psychology, 23 (1), pp.258-304. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2012.741134]
  • Hollander, E. P.(1958), “Conformity, Status, and Idiosyncrasy Credit,” Psychological Review, 65(2), pp.117-127. [https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042501]
  • Kark, R. and B. Shamir(2002), “The Dual Effect of Transformational Leadership: Priming Relational and Collective Selves and Further Effects on Followers,” in B, J. Avolio and F. J. Yammarino(Eds.), Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead, Emerald Group Publishing, pp.67-91.
  • Keltner, D., G. A. Van Kleef, S. Chen, and M. W. Kraus(2008). “A Reciprocal Influence Model of Social Power: Emerging Principles and Lines of Inquiry,” in M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (40), San Diego, Academic Press, pp.151-192. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00003-2]
  • Kniffin, K. M., B. Wansink, V. Griskevicius, and D. S. Wilson(2014), “Beauty is in the Ingroup of the Beholded: Intergroup Differences in the Perceived Attractiveness of Leaders,” The Leadership Quarterly, 25(6), pp.1143-1153. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.09.001]
  • Kruglanski, A. W., A. Pierro, L. Mannetti, and E. De Grada(2006), “Groups as Epistemic Providers: Need for Closure and the Unfolding of Group-centrism,” Psychological Review, 113(1), pp.84-100. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.84]
  • Lord, R. G.(1976), “Functional Leadership Behavior: Measurement and Relation to Social Power and Leadership Perceptions,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), pp.114-133. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2391749]
  • Lord, R. G. and K. J. Maher(1993), Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance, Routledge, London.
  • Lord, R. G. and R. J. Hall(2003), “Identity, Leadership Categorization, and Leadership Schema,” in D. van Knippenberg, and M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Leadership and Power: Identity Processes in Groups and Organizations, Thousand Oakes, Sage, pp.48-64. [https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216170.n5]
  • Lord, R. G. and S. J. Shondrick(2011), “Leadership and Knowledge: Symbolic, Connectionist, and Embodied Perspectives,” The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), pp.207-222. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.016]
  • Lord, R. G., R. J. Foti, and C. L. De Vader(1984), “A Test of Leadership Categorization Theory: Internal Structure, Information Processing, and Leadership Perceptions,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(3), pp.343-378. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90043-6]
  • Mael, F. and F. E. Ashforth(1992), “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), pp.103-123. [https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202]
  • Martin, R. and O. Epitropaki(2001), “Role of Organizational Identification on Implicit Leadership Theories (ILTs), Transformational Leadership and Work Attitudes,” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4(3), pp.247-262. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430201004003005]
  • Meindl, J. R., S. B. Ehrlich, and J. M. Dukerich (1985), “The Romance of Leadership,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 78-102. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2392813]
  • Meyer, J. P., E. S. Srinivas, J. B. Lal, and L. Topolnytsky(2007), “Employee Commitment and Support for an Organizational Change: Test of the Three-component Model in Two cultures,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(2), pp.185-211. [https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X118685]
  • Nohe, C., B. Michaelis, J. I. Menges, Z. Zhang, and K. Sonntag(2013), “Charisma and Organizational Change: A Multilevel Study of Perceived Charisma, Commitment to Change, and Team Performance,” The Leadership Quarterly, 24(2), pp.378-389. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.02.001]
  • Pierro, A., L. Cicero, M. Bonaiuto, D. van Knippenberg, D., and A. W. Kruglanski(2005), “Leader Group Prototypicality and Leadership Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Need for Cognitive Closure,” The Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), pp.503-516. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.002]
  • Pierro, A., L. Cicero, and E. Tory Higgins(2009), “Followers’ Satisfaction from Working with Group-prototypic Leaders: Promotion Focus as Moderator”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), pp.1105-1110. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.020]
  • Platow, M. J., S. A. Haslam, M. Foddy, and D. M. Grace(2003), “Leadership as the Outcome of Self-categorization Processes,” in D. van Knippenberg and M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Leadership and Power: Identity Processes in Groups and Organizations, London, Sage, pp.33-47. [https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216170.n4]
  • Platow, M. J. and D. van Knippenberg(2001), “A Social Identity Analysis of Leadership Endorsement: The Effects of Leader Ingroup Prototypicality and Distributive Intergroup Fairness,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), pp.1508-1519. [https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711011]
  • Platow, M. J., D. van Knippenberg, S. A. Haslam, B. van Knippenberg, and R. Spears(2006), “A Special Gift We Bestow on You for Being Representative of Us: Considering Leader Charisma from a Self-categorization Perspective,” British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), pp.303-320. [https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X41986]
  • Rafferty, A. E. and M. A. Griffin(2006), “Perceptions of Organizational Change: A Stress and Coping Perspective,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), pp.1154-1162. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1154]
  • Rast, D. E. III, A. M. Gaffney, M. A. Hogg, and R. J. Crisp(2012), “Leadership under Uncertainty: When Leaders who are Non-prototypical Group Members Can Gain Support,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), pp.646-653. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.013]
  • Shondrick, S. J., J. E. Dinh, and R. G. Lord(2010), “Developments in Implicit Leadership Theory and Cognitive Science: Applications to Improving Measurement and Understanding Alternatives to Hierarchical Leadership,” The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), pp.959-978. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.004]
  • Steffens, N. K., S. A. Haslam, and S. D. Reicher (2014), “Up Close and Personal: Evidence that Shared Social Identity Is a Basis for the ‘Special’ Relationship that Binds Dollowers to Leaders,” The Leadership Quarterly, 25 (2), pp.296-313. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.008]
  • Tajfel, H. and J. C. Turner(1979), “An Integrateve Theory of Intergroup Confilct,” in W. G. Austin and S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Pub. Co, pp.38-43.
  • Tiedens, L. Z. and S. Linton(2001), “Judgment under Emotional Certainty and Uncertainty: The Effects of Specific Emotions on Information Processing,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), pp.973-988. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973]
  • Turner, J. C., M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, and M. S. Wetherell(1987), Rediscovering the Social Group: Self-categorization Theory. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
  • van Dijke, M. and D. De Cremer(2010), “Procedural Fairness and Endorsement of Prototypical Leaders: Leader Benevolence or Follower Control?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), pp.85-96. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.004]
  • van Knippenberg, D. and M. A. Hogg(2003), “A Social Identity Model of Leadership Effectiveness in Organizations,” in B.M. Staw and R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Oxford, Elsevier, pp.243-295. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25006-1]
  • van Knippenberg, D. and E. Sleebos(2006), “Organizational Identification versus Organizational Commitment: Self-definition, Social Exchange, and Job Attitudes,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), pp.571-584. [https://doi.org/10.1002/job.359]
  • van Knippenberg, B. and D. van Knippenberg(2005), “Leader Self-sacrifice and Leadership Effectiveness: The Moderating role of Leader Prototypicality,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), pp.25-37. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.25]
  • van Knippenberg, D., B. van Knippenberg, and A. Bobbio(2008), “Leaders as Agents of Continuity: Self Continuity and Resistance to Collective Change,” in F. Sani (Ed.), Self-continuity: Individual and Collective Perspectives, New York, Psychology Press, pp.175-186.
  • van Knippenberg, D., B. van Knippenberg, D. De Cremer, and M. A. Hogg(2004), “Leadership, Self, and Identity: A Review and Research Agenda,” The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), pp.825-856. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.002]
  • van Quaquebeke, N., D. van Knippenberg, and F. C. Brodbeck(2011), “More Than Meets the Eye: The Role of Subordinates’ Self-perceptions in Leader Categorization Processes,” The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), pp.367-382. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.011]
  • van Quaquebeke, N. and D. van Knippenberg(2012), “Second-generation Leader Categorization Research: How Subordinates' Self and Typical Leader Perceptions Moderate Leader Categorization Effects,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(6), pp.1293-1319. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00899.x]
  • Weary, G. and J. A. Edwards(1996), “Causal-Uncertainty Beliefs and Related Goal Structures”, in R. M. Sorrentino and E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: The Interpersonal Context, New York, Guilford Press, pp.148-181.
  • Weary, G., J. A. Jacobson, J. A. Edwards, and S. J. Tobin(2001), “Chronic and Temporarily Activated Causal Uncertainty Beliefs and Stereotype Usage,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), pp.206-219. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.206]
  • Yukl, G. A.(2012), Leadership in Organizations, Pearson, Boston.
  • Zaccaro, S. J. and R. J. Klimoski(2002), The Nature of Organizational Leadership: Understanding the Performance Imperatives Confronting Today's Leaders, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

• 저자 이은영은 현재 서강대학교 경영전문대학원 인사조직전략 박사과정에 재학중이다. 동 대학원 경영학 석사를 취득하였으며 서강대 지속가능기업 윤리연구소에서 연구원으로 재직하였다. 주요 연구분야는 조직정체성, 기업윤리, 장애인 등 소수자(minority) 관리 등이다.

• 저자 조봉순은 현재 서강대학교 경영학부 교수로 재직 중이다. 서울대학교 경영대학 및 대학원 경영학과를 졸업하였으며, 미국 뉴욕주립대에서 박사를 취득하였다. 주요 연구분야로는 조직내 및 조직간 갈등, 사회정체성이론, 리더십, 전략적 인적자원관리 등이다.