Korean Academic Society of Business Administration
[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 54, No. 6, pp.1563-1592
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2025
Received 16 Jun 2025 Revised 06 Jul 2025 Accepted 07 Aug 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2025.54.6.1563

What Drives Smart Tech Choices? Comparing Manufacturing and Service Firms’ Journey into Intelligent IT

Kyu-Sun Choi ; So-Youn Park
(First Author) Ajou University ks92860001@gmail.com
(Corresponding Author) U1 University selly0123@naver.com
최규선 ; 박소연
(주저자) 아주대학교
(교신저자) 유원대학교


Copyright 2025 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This study explores the roles of digital literacy and privacy concerns in shaping the intention to use intelligent information technology (IIT) across the manufacturing and service sectors, a key consideration for digital transformation in contemporary businesses. By surveying 316 mid- to senior-level managers from technology-based companies, split evenly between these two sectors, and employing structural equation modeling and multi-group analysis, this research integrates digital literacy and privacy concerns within the established Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) framework. The findings reveal that digital literacy (DL) universally and positively influences the intention to use IIT (ITU) in both sectors, though the underlying mechanisms differ significantly. In the manufacturing sector, DL directly influenced ITU. Conversely, digital information sharing lacked a direct effect on ITU but demonstrated a fully mediated effect through perceived usefulness (PU), thereby indirectly influencing ITU. In the service sector, higher DL amplified privacy concerns (PC); this privacy concern negatively moderated the effect of DL on PU, and consequently, PC also negatively moderated the overall impact of DL on ITU through PU. Notably, the effect of perceived ease of use (PEOU) on ITU varies significantly between the sectors. The study concludes that while digital literacy is crucial in both contexts, significant structural differences exist in the relationships among perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, privacy concerns, and the ultimate intention to use IIT. These insights underscore the need for sector-specific strategies to ensure the effective adoption of IIT during digital transformation.

Keywords:

Intelligent Information Technology, Technology Acceptance Model, Digital Literacy, Privacy Concern

References

  • Aleksander, I. (2004), “Advances in intelligent information technology: re-branding or progress towards conscious machines?,” Journal of Information Technology, 19(1), pp.21-27. [https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000001]
  • Alsetoohy, O., Ayoun, B., Arous, S., Megahed, F. and Nabil, G. (2019), “Intelligent agent technology: What affects its adoption in hotel food supply chain management?,” Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 10(3), pp.286-310. [https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-01-2018-0005]
  • Arnaud, J., São Mamede, H. and Branco, F. (2025), “The relationship between digital transformation and digital literacy-an explanatory model: Systematic literature review,” F1000Research, 13, 253. [https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.146991.2]
  • Cainelli, G., Evangelista, R. and Savona, M. (2006), “Innovation and economic performance in services: A firm-level analysis,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(3), pp.435-458. [https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei067]
  • Carlsson Hauff, J. and Nilsson, J. (2023), “Individual costs and societal benefits: the privacy calculus of contact-tracing apps,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 40(2), pp.171-180. [https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2021-4559]
  • Cetindamar, D., Abedin, B. and Shirahada, K. (2021), “The role of employees in digital transformation: a preliminary study on how employees’ digital literacy impacts use of digital technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
  • Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K. and Baabdullah, A. M. (2021), “Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, p.120880. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120880]
  • Chen, C. J. and Hung, S. W. (2010), “To give or to receive? Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities,” Information Management, 47(4), pp.226-236. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.03.001]
  • Chiu, T. K., Sun, J. C. Y. and Ismailov, M. (2022), “Investigating the relationship of technology learning support to digital literacy from the perspective of self-determination theory,” Educational Psychology, 42(10), pp.1263-1282. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2074966]
  • Cho, K. W., Kim, S. W., Cho, Y. R., Kang, H. J. and Sohn, S. A. (2017), “2017 Guidelines of the Korean Innovation Survey―Recent Developments and Applications,” Science & Technology Policy Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp.319-340. [https://doi.org/10.2307/249008]
  • Dholakia, R. R., Dholakia, N. and Della Bitta, A. J. (1991), “Acquisition of telecommunications products and services: An examination of inter-sector differences,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(4), pp. 328-335. [https://doi.org/10.1109/17.97439]
  • Djellal, F. and Gallouj, F. (1999), “Services and the search for relevant innovation indicators: A review of national and international surveys,” Science and Public Policy, 26(4), pp.218-232. [https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782400]
  • Gadrey, J., Gallouj, F. and Weinstein, O. (1995), “New modes of innovation: How services benefit industry,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(3), pp.4-16. [https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239510091321]
  • Gefen, D. and Straub, D. W. (2000), “The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(1), pp.1-30. [https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00008]
  • Golda, A., Mekonen, K., Pandey, A., Singh, A., Hassija, V., Chamola, V. and Sikdar, B. (2024), “Privacy and Security Concerns in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Survey,” IEEE Access, 12, pp.48126-48144. [https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3381611]
  • Guo, H., Yang, J. and Han, J. (2019), “The fit between value proposition innovation and technological innovation in the digital environment: Implications for the performance of startups,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(3), pp.797-809. [https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2918931]
  • Gupta, M., Akiri, C., Aryal, K., Parker, E. and Praharaj, L. (2023), “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy,” IEEE Access, 11, pp.80218-80245. [https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3300381]
  • Hair, J. F. (2022), A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd ed., SAGE [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7]
  • Hamutoglu N. B., Gemikonakli O., De Raffaele C. and GEZGİN D. M. (2020), “Comparative cross-cultural study in digital literacy,” Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 88, pp.121-147. [https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.88.6]
  • Han, S. Y. and Kang, H. M. (2007), “Enhancing information sharing activities in Local Government,” Korea Local Administration Review, 21(1), pp.97-122.
  • Hassandoust, F., Akhlaghpour, S. and Johnston, A. C. (2021), “Individuals’ privacy concerns and adoption of contact tracing mobile applications in a pandemic: A situational privacy calculus perspective,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 28(3), pp.463-471. [https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa240]
  • Hollenstein, H. (2003), “Innovation modes in the Swiss service sector: A cluster analysis based on firm-level data,” Research Policy, 32(5), pp.845-863. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00091-4]
  • Jadin, T., Gnambs, T. and Batinic, B. (2013), “Personality traits and knowledge sharing in online communities,” Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), pp.210-216. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.08.007]
  • Jang, M., Aavakare, M., Nikou, S. and Kim, S. (2021), “The impact of literacy on intention to use digital technology for learning: A comparative study of Korea and Finland,” Telecommunications Policy, 45(7), pp.102154. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102154]
  • Jarvenpaa, S. L. and Staples, D. S. (2000), “The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants,” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2-3), 129-154. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00042-1]
  • Joo, S. O. (2018), “The influence of the tour platform on customer satisfaction and behavioral intention by technology acceptance model,” International Journal of Tourism Management Sciences, 33(4), pp.57-74. [https://doi.org/10.21719/IJTMS.33.4.4]
  • Khan, F. and Vuopala, E. (2019), “Digital competence assessment across generations,” International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 10(2), pp.15-28. [https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDLDC.2019040102]
  • Kinkel, S., Baumgartner, M. and Cherubini, E. (2022), “Prerequisites for the adoption of AI technologies in manufacturing–Evidence from a worldwide sample of manufacturing companies,” Technovation, 110, pp.102375. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102375]
  • Kim, E. S. and Kim, Y. J. (2019), “An Empirical Study on Users’ Intention to Use Insurtech Digital Insurance Platform Service,” Korean Management Review, 48(4), pp. 997-1043. [https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2019.48.4.997]
  • Kim, J. R. (2020), “Factors affecting intention to introduce smart factory in SMEs: Including government assistance expectancy and task technology fit,” Journal of Venture Innovation, 3(2), pp. 41-76.
  • Koufaris, M. and Hampton-Sosa, W. (2004), “The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers,” Information & Management, 41(3), pp.377-397. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.004]
  • Lee, J. H. (2016), “The Influence of Non-technological on Technological Innovations: Manufacturing and Service Industry,” Journal of Industrial Innovation, 32(2), pp.1-32.
  • Leitgöb, H., Seddig, D., Asparouhov, T., Behr, D., Davidov, E., De Roover, K., Jak, S., Meitinger, K., Menold, N., Muthén, B., Rudnev, M., Schmidt, P. and van de Schoot, R. (2023), “Measurement Invariance in the Social Sciences: Historical Development, Methodological Challenges, State of the Art, and Future Perspectives,” Social Science Research, 110, 102805. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102805]
  • Lim, G. C. (2012), “Schutzbereich der perzonenbezogenen Daten,” Korea and Deutschland Law Journal, 17, pp.223-248.
  • McKnight, D. H., Liu, P. and Pentland, B. T. (2020), “Trust change in information technology products,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(4), pp.1015-1046. [https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2020.1831772]
  • Moon, J. W. (2014), “A Study on the Concept of Personal Data,” Public Law, 42(3), pp.53-77.
  • Pae, S. I. (2018), “The effect of contents quality and perceived risk on perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and behavioral intention of a smartphone application for a foodservice company,” International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 32 (6), pp.1790195. [https://doi.org/10.21298/IJTHR.2018.06.32.6.179]
  • Park, H. S. (2014), “Review on concept of personal information in big data age,” Law & Technology, 10(1), 3-18.
  • Pavitt, K. (1984), “Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory,” Research Policy, 13(6), pp.343-373. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0]
  • Pires, C. P., Sarkar, S. and Carvalho, L. (2008), “Innovation in services―How different from manufacturing?,” Service Industries Journal, 28(10), pp.1339-1356. [https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060802317812]
  • Pool, C. R. (1997), “A new digital literacy: A conversation with Paul Gilster,” Educational Leadership, 55(3), pp.6-11.
  • Savastano, M., Amendola, C., Bellini, F. and D’Ascenzo, F. (2019), “Contextual impacts on industrial processes brought by the digital transformation of manufacturing: A systematic review,” Sustainability, 11(3), pp.891. [https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030891]
  • Sayaf, A. M., Alamri, M. M., Alqahtani, M. A. and Alrahmi, W. M. (2022), “Factors influencing university students’ adoption of digital learning technology in teaching and learning,” Sustainability, 14(1), pp.493. [https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010493]
  • Shang, L., Zhou, J. and Zuo, M. (2020), “Understanding older adults’ intention to share health information on social media: The role of health belief and information processing,” Internet Research, 31(1), pp.100-122. [https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-12-2019-0512]
  • Shin, J. S. and Sohn, Y. S. (2024), “A Study on the Influence of Online Recommendation Service Types on Consumers’ Product Adoption Intention,” Korean Management Review, 53(3), pp.761-785. 10.17287/kmr.2024.53.3.761 [https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2024.53.3.761]
  • Sprenger, D. A. and Schwaninger, A. (2021), “Technology acceptance of four digital learning technologies (classroom response system, classroom chat, e-lectures, and mobile virtual reality) after three months’ usage,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 8. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00243-4]
  • Tang, Z., Zeng, C. and Zeng, Y. (2025), “Research on data security in industry 4.0 manufacturing industry against the background of privacy protection challenges,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 38 (5), pp.636-648. [https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2024.2319656]
  • Tether, B. S. (2005), “Do services innovate (differently)? Insights from the European innobarometer survey,” Industry & Innovation, 12(2), pp. 153-184. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710500087891]
  • Spohrer, J., Vargo, S. L., Caswell, N. and Maglio, P. P. (2008), “A meta-theory for understanding IS in socio-technical systems,” 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, pp.451-451. [https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.28]
  • Ul-Hameed, W., Shabbir, M. S., Raza, A. and Salman, R. (2019), “Remedies of low performance among Pakistani e-logistic companies: The role of Firm’s IT capability and information communication technology (ICT),” Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 7(2), pp.369-380. [https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2018.6.002]
  • Vardalachakis, M., Tampouratzis, M., Papadakis, N. and Vasilakis, M. (2024), “The Future of Privacy: A Review on AI's Role in Shaping Data Security,” 2024 5th International Conference in Electronic Engineering, Information Technology & Education (EEITE), Chania, Greece, pp.1-8. [https://doi.org/10.1109/EEITE61750.2024.10654397]
  • Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. (2008), “Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions,” Decision Sciences, 39(2), pp.273-315. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x]
  • Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000), “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies,” Management Science, 46(2), pp.186-204. [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926]
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. and Davis, F. D. (2003), “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS Quarterly, 425-478. [https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540]
  • Yi, H. S. and Kim P. S. (2019), “The Effect of Consumer’s Technology Acceptance and Resistance on Intention to Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI),” Korean Management Review, 48(5), pp.1195-1219. [https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2019.48.5.1195]
  • Zostant, M. and Chataut, R. (2023), “Privacy in computer ethics: Navigating the digital age,” Computer Science and Information Technology, 4(2), pp.183-190. [https://doi.org/10.11591/csit.v4i2.pp183-190]

∙ The author Kyu-Sun Choi is an Associate Professor at Technology Commercialization Center Ajou University, South Korea. He holds a Ph.D. in technology management and specializes in ICT, startup policy and technology commercialization. Prior to his academic appointment, He gained practical experience at various government agencies, research institutes, and venture capital entities. His research interests include AI, Startup ecosystem and business innovation strategy.

∙ The author So-Youn Park is an Assistant Professor specializing in entrepreneurship education, small business development, and entrepreneurial resilience at U1 University. She holds a Ph.D. in convergent consulting and has dedicated her academic career to supporting aspiring entrepreneurs.