Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Korean Academic Society of Business Administration
[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 53, No. 4, pp.971-995
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Aug 2024
Received 06 Feb 2024 Revised 15 Apr 2024 Accepted 23 Apr 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2024.53.4.971

COVID-19 팬데믹 기간에도 ESG 경영과 ESG 경영 수준의 변동은 기업 가치를 증대시켜 주는가?

유정은 ; 손성진
(주저자) 삼성전자서비스/ CS혁신그룹장, 단국대학교 경영학석사 proyje@hanmail.net
(교신저자) 단국대학교 경영학부 교수 phdssj@dankook.ac.kr
Can ESG Management and the Volatility of ESG Management Levels During the COVID-19 Pandemic Lead to Enhanced Firm Value?
Jung-eun Yu ; Sung-jin Son
(First Author) Head of Group, CS Innovation Group, Samsung Electronics Service: Master of Business Administration, Dankook University proyje@hanmail.net
(Corresponding Author) Professor, Department of Business Administration, Dankook University phdssj@dankook.ac.kr


Copyright 2024 THE KOREAN ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

초록

본 연구는 코로나19 팬데믹 기간(2020-2022년)동안 ESG 경영과 그 변동이 기업가치를 개선할 수 있는지 전망이론을 적용하여 분석하였다. 패널회귀분석을 통해 고정효과 모형을 적용한 결과, ESG 점수와 변동이 ROA와 ROE에 유의한 영향을 미치지 않은 반면, ESG 변동은 Tobin Q에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다. 또한, 국내 상장기업의 약 32.7%가 우수한 재무성과를 보이며 양호한 ESG 성과를 나타냈다. 반면, 경제적 가치는 높지만, 사회적 가치는 낮은 기업의 비중도 29.1%에 달했다. 이는 코로나19를 비롯한 다양한 요인들의 부정적 이슈로 인해 ESG 점수가 B 이하로 떨어진 기업이 전년 대비 5배 이상 급증한 것에 기인한 것으로 분석된다. 본 연구는 코로나19 팬데믹과 같은 특수한 환경에서도 기업이 부정적인 이슈를 완화하고 긍정적인 측면을 강화하면 기업가치를 개선할 수 있다는 새로운 증거를 제시하고 있다.

Abstract

This study investigated whether ESG management and its volatility could enhance firm value during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2022), considering prospect theory. Panel regression analysis, applying a fixed-effect model, revealed that while ESG scores and their volatility did not significantly impact ROA and ROE, ESG volatility had a positive effect on Tobin Q. Additionally, approximately 32.7% of Korean listed companies demonstrated excellent ESG performance with satisfactory financial results. However, companies with high economic value but low social value also accounted for 29.1%. These are attributed to various factors, particularly the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused significant disruption and led to a more than five-fold increase in the number of companies experiencing ESG scores dropping below B due to negative challenges compared to previous years. This study provides new evidence that companies can improve financial performance amidst unique environmental circumstances, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, by mitigating negative issues and bolstering positive aspects to enhance corporate value.

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility, ESG, Firm Value, Sustainability, Prospect Theory

키워드:

사회적 책임, ESG, 기업가치, 지속가능성, 전망이론

References

  • 강원, 정무권(2020), “ESG 활동의 효과와 기업의 재무적 특성,” 한국증권학회지, 제49권 5호, pp.681-707.
    Kang, W., and M. Jung(2020), “Effect of ESG activities and firm’s financial characteristics,” Korean Journal of Financial Studies, 49(5), pp.681-707. [ https://doi.org/10.26845/KJFS.2020.10.49.5.681 ]
  • 김광민, 이헌상(2021), “ESG 등급이 신용등급, 부채비용 그리고 기업가치에 미치는 영향,” 한국산업경제학회, 정기학술발표대회, 초록집, pp.11-19.
    Kim, K. M and H. S. Lee(2021), “The impact of ESG ratings on credit ratings, debt costs, and corporate value,” An Abstract of The Regular Academic Presentation of The Korean Industrial Economic Association, pp.11-19.
  • 김숙연, 정수현, 김재환, 남윤명(2014), “서비스기업의 사회적 책임 활동과 기업가치와의 관련성,” 서비스경영학회지, 제15권 2호, pp.311-330.
    Kim, S. Y., S. H. Jung, J. H. Kim and Y. M. Nam(2014), “The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value in Service Industry,” Journal of Korea Service Manage- ment Society, 15(2), pp.311-330. [ https://doi.org/10.15706/jksms.2014.15.2.013 ]
  • 김윤경(2020), “기업 비재무정보(ESG) 공시가 재무성과와 기업가치에 미치는 영향,” 규제연구, 제29권 1호, pp.35-59.
    Kim, Y. K.(2020), “Effects of Non-financial Infor- mation Disclosure on Firm Performance and Firm Value,” Journal of Regulation Studies, 29(1), pp.35-59.
  • 김세희, 선우희연, 이우종, 정아름(2022), “ESG 활동과 기업가치의 상관관계와 인과관계,” 회계저널, 제31권 3호, pp.31-60.
    Kim, S, H. Y. Sunwoo, W. J. Lee, A. Jung(2022), “Value Implications of ESG Performance,” Korean Accounting Journal, 31(3, pp.31- 60.
  • 김태민, 김리라, 허종호(2022), “ESG경영이 재무성과에 미치는 영향: 고객만족의 매개효과,” 전문경영인연구, 제25권 2호, pp.159-176.
    Kim, T. M., R. Kim and J. H. Huh(2022), “The Influence of ESG Management on Financial Performance: The Mediation Effect of Cus- tomer Satisfaction,” Journal of CEO and Management Studies, 25(2), pp.159-176. [ https://doi.org/10.37674/CEOMS.25.2.9 ]
  • 김현석(2024), “기업의 ESG 활동과 가치 관련성 분석: 가치평가 변수를 성장기회와 가치평가 오류로 분해하여,” 경영학연구, 53(1), pp.197-224.
    Kim, H. S.(2024), “ESG Activities and Value Relevance: Break Down the Market-to-Book Ratio into Growth Opportunities and Mis- valuation Measures,” Korean Management Review 53(1), pp.197-224. [ https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2024.53.1.197 ]
  • 민재형, 김범석, 하승인(2014), “지속가능경영을 위한 기업의 환경적, 사회적, 지배구조적 요인이 주가수익률 및 기업 가치에 미치는 영향,” 한국경영과학회지, 제39권 4호, pp.33-49.
    Min, J. H., B. S. Kim and S. I. Ha(2014), “The Impact of Firms’ Environmental, Social, and Governancial Factors for Sustainability on Their Stock Returns and Values,” Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Manage- ment Science Society, 39(4), pp.33-49. [ https://doi.org/10.7737/JKORMS.2014.39.4.033 ]
  • 박소민, 박세열(2022), “기업의 ESG 수준과 재무성과 및 기업가치와의 관계: 산업별 효과를 중심으로,” 전문경영인연구, 제25권 3호, pp.41-61.
    Park, S. M and S. Y. Park(2022), “Industry Effects of the Relationship between ESG Performance and Firm Value,” Journal of CEO and Ma- nagement Studies, 25(3), pp.41-61. [ https://doi.org/10.37674/CEOMS.25.3.3 ]
  • 서해진, 송태호, 우정신(2019), “기업의 사회적 책임 활동과 고객만족도의 변동과 상호작용이 기업의 재무적 성과에 미치는 영향,” 상품학연구, 제37권 1호, pp.31-42.
    Seo, H. J., T. H. Song and J. Yu(2019), “The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility, Volatility of Customer Satisfaction, and the Interaction Effect on Firm’s Financial Per- formance,” Journal of Product Research, 37 (1), pp.31-42.
  • 손성진(2016), “한국의 사회적 책임기업의 재무적 특성과 경제적 성과와의 관계,” 관리회계연구, 제16권 2호, pp.201-240.
    Son, S. J.(2016), “The relation between Financial Characteristics and Economic Performances in Korean CSR Companies: Comparative Analysis for contextual Factors,” Korean Journal of Management Accounting Research, 16(2), pp.201-240.
  • 양진수, 임욱빈, 김정렬(2022), “기업의 ESG 경영 수준이 기업가치 변동에 미치는 영향: 코로나19 대유행 기간의 유가증권시장을 중심으로,” 경영교육연구, 제37권 3호, pp.327-349.
    Yang, J. S., W. B. Leem and J. R. Kim(2022), “Influence of Company’s ESG Management Level on Changes in Corporate Value: Focusing on the Stock Market during the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Korean Business Education Re- view, 37(3), pp.327-349. [ https://doi.org/10.23839/kabe.2022.37.3.327 ]
  • 여영준, 최순재, 권오진(2015), “산업 내 경쟁에 따른 경쟁전략으로써의 CSR 활동의 선택과 기업의 재무성과간의 관련성 연구: 시장유형별 분석을 중심으로,” 회계학연구, 제40권 4호, pp.1-37.
    Yeo, Y. J., S. J. Choi and O. J. Kwon(2015), “CSR activities as a competitive strategy based on industry competition and firm performance: Focusing on the market type,” Korean Accounting Review, 40(4), pp.1-37.
  • 임욱빈(2019), “비재무적 정보가 기업성과에 미치는 영향: ESG 점수를 중심으로,” 국제회계연구, 제86권, pp.119-144.
    Leem, W. B.(2019), “Effect of Non-Financial Infor- mation on Firm Performance : Focusing on ESG Score,” Korea International Accounting Review, 86, pp.119-144.
  • 정윤태, 안영규(2022), “기업의 ESG 활동과 정보공시가 재무성과에 미치는 영향,” e-비즈니스연구, 제23권 3호, pp.255-273.
    Jung, Y. T. and Y. G. Ahn(2022), “The Effect of ESG Activities and Information Disclosure on Corporate Financial Performance,” The e-Business Studies, 23(3), pp.255-273. [ https://doi.org/10.20462/tebs.2022.6.23.3.255 ]
  • 조인영(2023), “기업의 ESG 환경등급과 재무성과에 관한 연구,” 로고스경영연구, 제21권 2호, pp.269-290.
    Cho, I. Y.(2023), “A Study on Corporate ESG Environmental Ratings and Financial Per- formance,” Logos Management Review, 21 (2), pp.269-290.
  • 천미림, 유재미(2013), “기업의 사회적 책임활동이 기업 재무성과에 미치는 영향,” 경영학연구, 제42권 5호, pp.1159-1185.
    Chon, M. L. and J. M. Yoo(2013), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance,” Korean Management Review, 42(5), pp.1159- 1185.
  • Barnea, A. and A. Rubin(2010), “Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Share- holders,” Journal of Business Ethics, 97, pp.71-86. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z]
  • Bowen, H. R.(1953), Social Responsibility of the Businessmen, New York, Harper.
  • Carroll, A. B.(1979), “A Three Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance,” The Academy of Management Review, 4, pp.497-505. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296]
  • Carroll, A. B.(1991), “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders,” Business Horizon, 34, pp.39-48. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G]
  • Elkington, J.(1997), Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Oxford, Capstone. [https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106]
  • Fiegenbaum, A.(1990), “Prospect theory and the risk- return association: An empirical examination in 85 industries,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, 14(2), pp.187-203. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(90)90074-N]
  • Figge, F., T. Hahn. S. Schaltegger and M. Wagner (2002), “The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard - linking sustainability management to business strategy,” Business Strategy and the En- vironment, 11(5), pp.269-284. [https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.339]
  • Freeman, E.(1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Cambridge University Press.
  • Friede, G., T. Busch and A. Bassen(2015), “ESG and Financial Performance: Aggregated Evidence from More than 2000 Empirical Studies,” Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5, pp.210-233. [https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917]
  • Friedman, M.(1970), “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits,” New York Times Magazine, pp.122-126.
  • IPCC(2018), “Global warming of 1.5oC,” An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming 1.5oC above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and effects to eradicate poverty. Masson-Delmotte, V. et al. Eds., World Meteorological Organization, pp.1-32.
  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky(1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, 47(2), pp.263-292. [https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185]
  • Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton(2001), “The Strategy- Focused Organization: How Balanced Sco- recard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment,” 1st Edition, Soundview Executive Book Summaries, Harvard Business School Press, Concordville, pp.148-159.
  • Kim J., S. Son, I, Jin(2022), “The Effects of Share- holding of the National Pension Fund on Environmental, Social, Governance, and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Industry,” Sustainability, 14(18), pp.1-17. [https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811788]
  • McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel(2011), “Creating and Capturing Value: Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility, Resource-based Theory, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 37, pp.1480-1495. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385696]
  • Mio, C., A. Costantini and S. Panfilo(2022), “Per- formance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Envi- ronmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, 29(2), pp.367-384. [https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2206]
  • Pava, M. L. and J. Krausz(1996), “The Association between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of social cost,” Journal of Business Ethics, 15, pp. 321-357. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382958]
  • Porter, M. and M. Kramer(2011), “Creating Shared Value: How to Reinvent Capitalism and Unleash a Wave of Innovation and Growth,” Harvard Business Review, 89, pp.62-77.
  • Preston, E. and P. O’Bannon(1997), “The Corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis,” Business and Society, 36(4), pp.419-429. [https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600406]
  • Ratnaningrum, Y. A. Aryani and D. Setiawan(2020), “Balanced Scorecard: Is it beneficial enough? A literature review,” Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives, 13(1), pp.65-84. [https://doi.org/10.22452/AJAP.vol13no1.4]
  • Son, S. J. and J. T. Kim(2022), “Environment, social, and governance performance and financial performance with national pension fund investment: Evidence from Korea,” Frontiers in Psychology, 13, pp.1-13. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.893535]
  • Teoh, S. H., I. Welch and C. P. Wazzan(1999), “The Effect of Socially Activist Investment Policies on the Financial Markets: Evidence from the South African Boycott,” Journal of Business, 72, pp.135-89. [https://doi.org/10.1086/209602]
  • United Nations Global Compact(2004), “Who Cares Wins”.
  • Von-Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern(1947), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Waddock, S. and S. Graves(1997), “The corporate social performance-financial performance link,” Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), pp. 303-319. [https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.3.CO;2-7]
  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), “Our Common Future,” the Brundtland Report.

∙ 저자 유정은은 현재 삼성전자서비스에 재직 중이다. 한양사이버대학교 영어학과를 졸업하였으며, 단국대학교 대학원에서 ESG 경영학을 전공해 경영학석사를 취득하였다. 주요 관심 분야는 ESG 경영과 탄소 중립 정책 등이다.

∙ 저자 손성진은 단국대학교 경영학부 회계학 전공 교수로 재직 중이다. 서강대학교 대학원에서 경영학박사학위를 취득하였다. 주요 연구 분야는 지속가능경영, 사회적 책임경영, 경영혁신과 성과관리시스템 등이다.