Korean Academic Society of Business Administration
[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 46, No. 5, pp.1503-1519
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Oct 2017
Received 03 Jan 2017 Accepted 07 Sep 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2017.46.5.1503

벤처기업의 지식 흡수능력과 기업가적 지향성이 혁신성과에 미치는 영향

이경미* ; 이장우**
*(주저자) 경북대학교 경영학부 yiikm91@gmail.com
**(교신저자) 경북대학교 경영학부 antonio@knu.ac.kr
The Impact of Knowledge Absorptive Capacity and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Innovation Performance of Korean Ventures
Kyungmi Lee* ; Jangwoo Lee**
*Master Student, School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University, First Author
**Professor, School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University, Corresponding Author

초록

본 연구는 우리나라의 벤처기업을 대상으로 지식 흡수능력이 혁신성과에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 이를 위해 지식 흡수능력과 혁신성과의 관계에서 기업가적 지향성의 조절효과와 환경동태성을 고려한 삼원 상호작용 효과(three-way interaction effects)를 분석하였다. 주요 연구결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 지식 흡수능력은 일정수준까지는 지식 흡수능력의 정도가 증가할수록 혁신성과가 높아지지만, 지식 흡수능력의 지나친 증가는 오히려 혁신성과에 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 지식 흡수능력과 혁신성과는 역 U자 형의 곡선관계를 가진다. 둘째, 지식 흡수능력과 혁신성과의 관계에 기업가적 지향성이 정(+)의 조절효과를 보였다. 즉, 기업가적 지향성의 정도는 지식 흡수능력과 혁신성과간의 역 U자 형의 곡선관계의 강도에 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 동태적인 환경일수록 이들의 상호작용 효과가 혁신성과에 긍정적 영향을 미친다. 이를 통해서, 지식 흡수능력의 혁신성과에 대한 효과를 제고하기 위해서는 기업가적 지향성의 뒷받침이 필요하다는 점을 확인할 수 있다. 본 연구결과의 시사점을 요약하면, 첫째, 기업의 혁신성과를 제고시키기 위해서는 적정 수준의 지식 흡수능력을 소유하는 것이 중요하다. 둘째, 환경동태성이 높을수록 기업가적 지향성은 흡수된 지식들과 레버리지 작용으로 수익체감을 방지하고 혁신성과를 강화시키는데 중요하다는 점 등을 제시할 수 있다.

Abstract

This study examines the impact of knowledge absorptive capacity on innovation performance of Korean ventures and the moderating impact of entrepreneurial orientation. We further examine the three-way interaction approach by considering the environmental dynamism. Using 125 samples of Korean ventures, we find an inverted curvilinear relationship between knowledge absorptive capacity and innovation performance. Additionally, as the level of entrepreneurial orientation increases, the inverted U-shaped curvilinear relationship between knowledge absorptive capacity and innovation performance becomes stronger. Lastly, under the higher environmental dynamism, the interaction impact of entrepreneurial orientation and knowledge absorptive capacity may positively affect innovation performance. The findings’ implications for research and managerial practice are discussed.

Keywords:

Korean Ventures, Absorptive Capacity, Entrepreneurial Orientation, Environmental Dynamism, Innovation Performance

키워드:

벤처기업, 지식 흡수능력, 기업가적 지향성, 환경동태성, 혁신성과

References

  • 김영조(2005), “기술협력 활동이 중소기업의 기술혁신 성과에 미치는 영향,” 경영학연구, 34(5), 1365-1390.
  • 이장우·이성훈(2002), “벤처기업의 성장정체에 관한 탐색적 연구,” 전략경영연구, 5(2), 1-27.
  • 이장우·이현숙(2000), “벤처기업의 유형구분과 경영성과,” 기업가정신과 벤처연구 (구 벤처경영연구), 3(2), 3-31.
  • 이장우·장수덕(1998), “학술연구: 벤처기업 성공요인에 관한 이론적 고찰,” 기업가정신과 벤처연구 (구 벤처경영연구), 1(2), 69-231.
  • 이장우·장수덕(2010), “환경의 불확실성, 의사결정과정 그리고 기업성과 간의 관계,” 경영학연구, 39(5), 1363-1387.
  • 허문구(2011), “지식탐색이 혁신에 미치는 영향,” 경영학연구, 40(5), 1247-1271.
  • Anderson, B. S., J. G. Covin, and D. P. Slevin (2009), “Understanding the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Strategic Learning Capability: An Empirical Investigation,” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(3), 218-240. [https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.72]
  • Barney, J.(1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. [https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108]
  • Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal(1990), “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-152. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553]
  • Cooper, A. C., G. E. Willard, and C. Y. Woo (1986), “Strategies of High Performing New and Small Firms: A Reexamination of the Niche Concept,” Journal of Business Venturing, 1(3), 247-260. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(86)90003-0]
  • Covin, J. G., and D. P. Slevin(1989), “Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments,” Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107]
  • Dess, G. G., and D. W. Beard(1984), “Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 52-73. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2393080]
  • Dess, G. G., G. T. Lumpkin, and J. G. Covin(1997), “Entrepreneurial Strategy Making and Firm Performance: Tests of Contingency and Configurational Models,” Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 677-695. [https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<677::AID-SMJ905>3.0.CO;2-Q]
  • Engelen, A., H. Kube, S. Schmidt, and T. C. Flatten (2014), “Entrepreneurial Orientation in Turbulent Environments: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity,” Research Policy, 43(8), 1353-1369. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.002]
  • Engelen, A., A. Kaulfersch, and S. Schmidt(2016), “The Contingent Role of Top Management's Social Capital on the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance,” Journal of Small Business Management, 3(54), 827-850. [https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12164]
  • Hair Jr, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham(2010), “SEM: An Introduction,” Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 629-686.
  • Haans, R. F., C. Pieters, and Z. L. He(2015), “Thinking about U: Theorizing and Testing U-and inverted U-shaped Relationships in Strategy Research,” Strategic Management Journal. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2399]
  • Hu, L. T., and P. M. Bentler(1999), “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives,” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118]
  • Ireland, R. D., M. A. Hitt, and D. G. Sirmon(2003), “A Model of Strategic Entrepreneurship: The Construct and its Dimensions,” Journal of Management, 29(6), 963-989. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00086-2]
  • Jaccard, J., C. K. Wan, and R. Turrisi(1990), “The Detection and Interpretation of Interaction Effects between Continuous Variables in Multiple Regression,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(4), 467-478. [https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2504_4]
  • Jansen, J. J., F. A. Van Den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda(2005), “Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How do Organizational Antecedents Matter?,” Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999-1015. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573106]
  • Keh, H. T., T. T. M. Nguyen, and H. P. Ng(2007), “The Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Marketing Information on the Performance of SMEs,” Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 592-611. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.003]
  • Khandwalla, P. N.(1977), “The Design of Organizations,” Houghton Mifflin Harcourt P.
  • Kim, L.(1998), “Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning: Capability Building in Catching-up at Hyundai Motor,” Organization Science, 9(4), 506-521. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.4.506]
  • Kishton, J. M., and K. F. Widaman(1994), “Unidimensional Versus Domain Representative Parceling of Questionnaire Items: An Empirical Example,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 757-765. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164494054003022]
  • Lane, P. J., and M. Lubatkin(1998), “Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning,” Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461-477. [https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L]
  • Lane, P. J., B. R. Koka, and S. Pathak(2006), “The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct,” Academy of Management Review31(4), 833-863. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527456]
  • Leiponen, A., and C. E. Helfat(2010), “Innovation Objectives, Knowledge Sources, and the Benefits of Breadth,” Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 224-236. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.807]
  • Liao, J., H. Welsch, and M. Stoica(2003), “Organizational Absorptive Capacity and Respon-siveness: An Empirical Investigation of Growth-oriented SMEs,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1), 63-85. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00032]
  • Lichtenthaler, U.(2009), “Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes,” Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 822-846. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43670902]
  • Lumpkin, G. T., and G. G. Dess(1996), “Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance,” Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568]
  • Miller, D.(1983), “The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms,” Management Science, 29(7), 770-791. [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770]
  • Miller, D.(1987), “The Structural and Environmental Correlates of Business Strategy,” Strategic Management Journal, 8(1), 55-76. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250080106]
  • Miller, D., J. Lee, S. Chang, and I. Le Breton-Miller(2009), “Filling the Institutional Void: The Social Behavior and Performance of Family vs Non-family Technology Firms in Emerging Markets,” Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5), 802-817. [https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.11]
  • Miller, D.(2011). Miller (1983), “Revisited: A Reflection on EO Research and Some Suggestions for the Future,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 873-894. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00457.x]
  • Nahapiet, J., and S. Ghoshal(1998), “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225]
  • Podsakoff, P. M., and D. W. Organ(1986), “Self-reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects,” Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544. [https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408]
  • Stock, G. N., N. P. Greis, and W. A. Fischer(2001), “Absorptive Capacity and New Product Development,” The Journal of High Technology Management Research12(1), 77-91. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(00)00040-7]
  • Szulanski, G.(1996), “Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27-43. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171105]
  • Timmons, J. A., and W. D. Bygrave(1986), “Venture Capital's Role in Financing Innovation for Economic Growth,” Journal of Business Venturing, 1(2), 161-176. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(86)90012-1]
  • Tsai, W.(2001), “Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004. [https://doi.org/10.2307/3069443]
  • Wales, W. J., P. C. Patel, V. Parida, and P. M. Kreiser(2013), “Nonlinear Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Small Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Resource Orchestration Capabilities,” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(2), 93-121. [https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1153]
  • Wiklund, J., and D. Shepherd(2003), “Knowledge-based Resources, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and the Performance of Small and Medium-sized Businesses,” Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307-1314. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.360]
  • Wiklund, J., and D. Shepherd(2005), “Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configurational Approach,” Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71-91. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.001]
  • Zahra, S. A., and G. George(2002), “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension,” Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995]
  • Zahra, S. A., and J. C. Hayton(2008), “The Effect of International Venturing on Firm Performance: The Moderating Influence of Absorptive Capacity,” Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2), 195-220. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.01.001]
  • Zahra, S. A., and A. P. Nielsen(2002), “Sources of Capabilities, Integration and Technology Commercialization,” Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), 377-398. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.229]
  • Zhang, Y., H. Li, Y. Li, and L. A. Zhou(2010), “FDI Spillovers in an Emerging Market: The Role of Foreign Firms' Country Origin Diversity and Domestic Firms' Absorptive Capacity,” Strategic Management Journal, 31(9), 969-989. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.856]

• 저자 이경미는 경북대학교 일반대학원 전략 및 조직관리 전공 석사과정을 졸업하였다. 연구 관심분야는 기업가정신, 벤처혁신, 경영전략 등이다.

• 저자 이장우는 현재 경북대학교 경영학부 전략 및 조직관리 전공 정교수로 재직 중이다. 서울대학교 경영학과를 졸업하였으며, 한국과학기술원(KAIST)에서 산업공학 석사 및 경영과학 박사를 취득하였다. 미국 퍼듀 대학과 스탠포드 대학에서 방문학자로 연구하였다. 주요연구분야는 기업가정신과 벤처창업, 경영전략, 강소기업 경쟁력 등이다.