Korean Academic Society of Business Administration
[ Article ]
korean management review - Vol. 46, No. 1, pp.235-265
ISSN: 1226-1874 (Print)
Print publication date 28 Feb 2017
Received 07 Mar 2016 Revised 10 Oct 2016 Accepted 09 Dec 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2017.46.1.235

The Effect of Audit Partner on Accounting Comparability

Hyejin Ahn* ; Jong-Hag Choi** ; Moon Ki Chung***
*(First Author) Ph.D. Candidate, School of Business Administration, Seoul National University ahnhyejin@gmail.com
**(Corresponding Author) Professor, School of Business Administration, Seoul National University acchoi@snu.ac.kr
***(Co-Author) Associate Professor, Business School, Sungkyunkwan University mkchung@skku.edu
감사파트너가 회계정보의 비교가능성에 미치는 영향
안혜진* ; 최종학** ; 정문기***
*서울대학교 경영대학 박사과정, 주저자
**서울대학교 경영대학 교수, 교신저자
***성균관대학교 경영대학 부교수, 공저자

Abstract

This study examines the effect of audit partner on accounting comparability. Given that an actual audit engagement is completed by an audit partner and other audit team members, the role of the individual audit partner is substantial in the auditing process. We focus on the effects at engagement partner level since the engagement-level analysis reflects audit style most concretely and accurately, and thus exhibits more direct effect of auditor’s characteristics on financial statement. We conjecture that if audit styles of engagements are similar to each other, the engagements are more likely to yield consistent and comparable accounting information. Consistent with this conjecture, we find that a pair of clients audited by the same audit partner exhibits greater comparability (measured by the similarity of discretionary accruals of the two firms, but not by the similarity of total accruals) than a pair of clients audited by two different partners. This finding suggests the importance of investigation at the audit partner-level effect. In addition, we find that accounting comparability between a pair of clients is only observed when they are audited by the same partner in Big 4 audit firms, but not when they are audited by the same partner in non-Big 4 audit firms. The finding implies that Big 4 partners use relatively similar audit approach for different clients but non-Big 4 partners are more likely to accept the accounting methods preferred by client firms rather than applying their unique styles to their clients. As a result, among non-Big 4 audit firms, the effect of an individual audit partner is relatively less prevalent. Overall, these results provide some evidence about the individual audit partner’s effect on accounting comparability and the variability of audit quality in Big 4 versus non-Big 4 audit firms.

초록

이 연구는 개별 감사파트너가 회계정보의 비교가능성에 미치는 영향에 대해 조사하였다. 감사업무가 특정 감사파트너와 감사팀에 의해서 이루어진다는 점을 고려할 때 감사파트너의 역할은 매우 중요하다고 할 수 있다. 따라서 감사파트너의 특성에 따라 감사받은 피감기업의 재무제표에 포함된 회계정보의 특성이 달라질 수 있다. 이런 견해에서 본 연구에서는 두 가지 가설을 분석하였다. 첫째, 동일한 감사파트너가 감사한 두 기업은 동일한 회계법인 소속이지만 다른 파트너가 감사한 두 기업보다 회계처리의 비교가능성이 더 높을 것이다. 각 감사파트너마다 고유한 스타일이 있으며, 이런 스타일이 적절한 회계처리방법의 선택에 반영될 가능성이 높기 때문이다. 둘째, 대형회계법인 소속 감사파트너의 경우 이런 성향이 더욱 높은지 조사하였다. 대형회계법인의 경우 보다 철저한 교육훈련과 감사기법을 사용하기 때문에 상대적으로 감사파트너가 다르더라도 유사한 방법을 적용하는 경향이 높을 수 있기 때문이다. 국내 자료를 이용해서 실증분석한 결과는 이런 예측과 일관된다. 특히 재량적 발생액을 사용해서 회계처리의 비교가능성을 측정한 경우 더 뚜렷하게 이런 성향이 관찰되었다. 이런 발견을 종합하면, 감사파트너와 회계법인의 특성이 회계처리에 영향을 미친다고 결론내릴 수 있다.

Keywords:

Accounting Comparability, Audit Partner, Auditor Type

키워드:

회계정보의 비교가능성, 감사파트너, 대형감사인

Acknowledgments

This paper is based on the Master‘s thesis paper of the first author completed at Seoul National University. The second author plays a role of academic advisor. We express sincere thanks to Arhum Choi, Sunhwa Choi, Seok Woo Jung and other seminar participants at Seoul National University for helpful comments and suggestions.

References

  • Bae, G. S., S. U. Choi, and J. E. Lee(2014), “Audit Partner’s Experiences and their Differential Associations with Audit Hours, Audit Fees, and Audit Quality,” Korean Accounting Journal, 23(6), 175-235. [printed in Korean]
  • Barth, M. E., W. R. Landsman, M. H. Lang, and C. D. Williams(2012), “Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based Accounting Amounts Comparable?,” Journal of Accounting & Economics, 54(1), 68-93. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.03.001]
  • Barth, M. E., W. R. Landsman, M. H. Lang, and C. D. Williams(2013), “Effects on Comparability and Capital Market Benefits of Voluntary Adoption of IFRS by US Firms: Insights from Voluntary Adoption of IFRS by non-US Firms,” Working Paper, Stanford University. [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2196247]
  • Becker, C., M. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam(1998), “The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1-24. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1998.tb00547.x]
  • Brochet, F., A. D. Jagolinzer, and E. J. Riedl(2013), “Mandatory IFRS Adoption and Financial Statement Comparability,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1373-1400. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12002]
  • Campbell, J., and P. E. Yeung(2012), “Comparability, Investor Sophistication, and Contagion Effects,” Working Paper, Cornell University.
  • Carcello, J. V., and C. Li, C(2013), “Costs and Benefits of Requiring an Engagement Partner Signature: Recent Experience in the United Kingdom,” The Accounting Review, 88(5), 1511-1546. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50450]
  • Chen, C. Y., C. J. Lin, and Y. C Lin(2008), “Audit Partner Tenure, Audit Firm Tenure, and Discretionary Accruals: Does Long Auditor Tenure Impair Earnings Quality?,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(2), 415-445. [https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.2.5]
  • Chen, C.-W., D. W. Collins, T. Kravet, and R. D. Mergenthaler(2015), “Financial Statement Comparability and the Efficiency of Acquisition Decisions,” Working Paper, University of Iowa.
  • Chi, H. –Y., and C. –L. Chin(2011), “Firm Versus Partner Measures of Auditor Industry Expertise and Effects on Auditor Quality,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 201-229. [https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50004]
  • Choi, A., C. H. Sonu, J. Lee, and W. Ha(2016), “Audit Partner’s Length of Audit Experience and Audit Quality: Evidence from Korea,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, Forthcoming.
  • Cho, J., H. Choi, and D. Moon(2015), “Financial Statement Comparability and the Cost of Equity Capital,” Korean Accounting Review, 40(2), 1-38.
  • Choi, J. –H., S. Choi, L. A. Myers, and D. Ziebart (2013), “Financial Statement Comparability and the Ability of Current Stock Returns to Reflect the Information in Future Earnings,” Working Paper, University of Arkansas. [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2337571]
  • Choi, J. -H., J. -B. Kim, X. Liu, and D. Simunic (2008), “Audit Pricing, Legal Liability Regimes, and Big 4 Premiums: Theory and Cross-country Evidence,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 55-99. [https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.1.2]
  • Choi, S. U., and G. S. Bae(2016), “Are Financial Statements of the Clients that Share the Same Auditor Similar? An Analysis Using Audit Firms and Audit Partners,” Korean Accounting Journal 25(2): 239-273. [printed in Korean]
  • Choi, S. U., J. E. Lee, and G. S. Bae(2015), “Individual Audit Partner Fixed Effects on Audit Fees, Audit Hours, and Audit Quality,” Korean Accounting Review 40(1): 73-116. [printed in Korean]
  • Craswell, A., J. Francis, and S. Taylor(1995), “Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry Specializations,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(3), 297-322. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(95)00403-3]
  • DeFond, M., J. Francis, and T. J. Wong(2000), “Auditor Industry Specialization and Market Segmentation: Evidence from Hong Kong,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(1), 49-66. [https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2000.19.1.49]
  • DeFond, M., X. Hu, M. Hung, and S. Li(2011), “The Impact of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Foreign Mutual Fund Ownership: The Role of Comparability,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51, 240-258. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.02.001]
  • De Franco, G., S. Kothari, and R. S. Verdi(2011), “The Benefits of Financial Statement Comparability,” Journal of Accounting Research, 49(4), 895-931. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2011.00415.x]
  • Fang, V., M. Maffett, and B. Zhang(2014), “Foreign institutional Ownership and the Global Convergence of Financial Reporting Practices,” Journal of Accounting Research, 53(3), 593-631. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12076]
  • Fang, X., Y. Li, B. Xin, and W. J. Zhang(2012), “Accounting Comparability and Loan Contracting,” Working Paper, Georgia State University. [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2138202]
  • Ferguson, A., J. Francis, and D. Strokes(2003), “The Effects of Firm-wide and Office-level Industry Expertise on Audit Pricing,” The Accounting Review, 78(2), 429-448. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.2.429]
  • Financial Accounting Standards Board(1980), Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2: Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information.
  • Financial Accounting Standards Board(2010), Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 8: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.
  • Francis, J., and J. Krishnan(1999), “Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism,” Contemporary Accounting Research 16: 135-165. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1999.tb00577.x]
  • Francis, J., M. Pinnuck, and O. Watanabe(2014), “Auditor Style and Financial Statement Comparability,” The Accounting Review, 89(2), 605-633. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50642]
  • Francis, J., and M. Yu(2009), “The Effect of Big Four Office Size on Audit Quality,” The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521-1552. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521]
  • Gul, F., D. Wu. and Z. Yang(2013), “Do Individual Auditors Affect Audit Quality? Evidences from Archival Data,” The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1993-2023. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50536]
  • Hamilton, J.(2009), Global Audit Firms Oppose Requiring Engagement Partner to Sign Audit Report, Available at http://jimhamiltonblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/global-audit-firms-oppose-requiring.html, .
  • Ireland, J. C., and C. S. Lennox(2002), “The Large Audit Firm Fee Premium: A Case of Selectivity Bias?” Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 17(1), 73-91. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0201700104]
  • Jamal, K., and H. T. Tan(2010), “Joint Effects of Principles-based Versus Rules-based Standards and Auditor Type in Constraining Financial Managers’ Aggressive Reporting,” The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1325-1346. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1325]
  • Kawada. B(2014), “Auditor Offices and the Comparability and Quality of Clients’ Earnings,” Working Paper, San Diego State University. [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2510186]
  • Khurana, I., P. Michas, and K. K. Raman(2011), “Big Four Global Networks, Auditor Industry Expertise, and Properties of Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts,” Working Paper, University of Missouri-Columbia and University of North Texas.
  • Khurana, I., and K. K. Raman(2004), “Are Big Four Audits in ASEAN Countries of Higher Quality than Non-Big Four Audits?” Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(2), 139-165. [https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2004.10510640]
  • Ki, E. S., S. -K. Kwak, and H. Ahn(2015), “The Effect of the Interaction between Financial Statement Comparability and Complexity of Client Firms on the Audit Efforts,” Korean Accounting Review, 40(3), 43-81. [printed in Korean]
  • Ki, E. S., and S. Y. Kwon(2014), “The Benefits of Earnings Synchronicity in the Audit Process and Auditor’s Industry Specialization,” Korean Accounting Review, 38(4), 305-348. [printed in Korean]
  • Kim, S., P. Kraft, and S. G. Ryan(2013), “Financial Statement Comparability and Credit Risk,” Review of Accounting Studies, 18(3), 783-823. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-013-9233-z]
  • Kothari, S. P., A. Leone, and C. Wasley(2005), “Performance Matched Discretionary Accrual measures,” Journal of Accounting & Economics, 39, 163-197. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002]
  • Lang, M., M. Maffett, and E. Owens(2010), “Earnings Comovement and Accounting Comparability: The Effects of Mandatory IFRS Adoption,” Working Paper, University of North Carolina. [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1676937]
  • Lennox, C., and B. Li(2014), “Accounting Misstatements Following Lawsuits Against Auditors,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 65-93. [https://doi.org/10.2307/2491440]
  • Ozkan, N., Z. V. I. Singer, and H. You(2012), “Mandatory IFRS Adoption and the Contractual Usefulness of Accounting Information in Executive Compensation,” Journal of Accounting Research, 50(4), 1077-1107 [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00453.x]
  • Park, Y. H. and M. K. Chung(2015), “The Effects of the Mandatory Audit Partner Rotation on Audit Quality: Focused on the Impact of Regulatory Change,” Korean Accounting Review, 40(1), 39-72. [printed in Korean]
  • Reynolds, J. K., and J. R. Francis(2000), “Does Size Matter? The Influence of Large Clients on Office-level Auditor Reporting Decisions,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 375-400. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00010-6]
  • Wallman, S. M. H(1996), “The Future of Accounting, Part III: Reliability and Auditor Independence,” Accounting Horizons, 10(4), 76-97.
  • Wu, J. S., and I. Zhang(2011), “Accounting Integration and Comparability: Evidence from Relative Performance Evaluation around IFRS Adoption,” Working Paper, University of Rochester. [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1650782]
  • Yip, R. W. Y., and D. Young(2012), “Does Mandatory IFRS Adoption Improve Information Comparability?” The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1767-1789. [https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50192]
  • Zhang, H(2012), “Accounting Comparability, Audit Effort and Audit Outcome,” Working Paper, Louisiana State University.
  • Zerni, M(2012), “Audit Partner Specialization and Audit Fees: Some Evidence from Sweden,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 312-340. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01098.x]

• 저자 안혜진은 현재 서울대학교 경영대학 회계학 전공 박사과정에 재학 중이다. 서울대학교 경영대학을 졸업하였으며, 동 대학에서 경영학 석사를 취득하였다. 한국공인회계사로서 삼정회계법인에서 회계감사 및 컨설팅 업무를 수행하였다. 주요연구분야는 회계감사, 재무제표의 비교가능성 등이다.

• 저자 최종학은 서울대학교 경영대학 회계학 전공 교수로 재직 중이다. 서울대학교 경영대학 및 대학원 경영학과를 졸업하였으며, 일리노이대학에서 박사학위 취득 후 홍콩과기대학 조교수를 역임했다. 회계 분야 세계 저명 학술지들에 다수의 논문을 출판했으며, 현재 편집위원으로 활동하고 있다. 베스트셀러 ‘숫자로 경영하라’ 1, 2, 3권과 수필집 ‘마흔, 감성의 눈을 떠라’를 저술하였다. 주요연구분야는 회계감사, 기업지배구조, 공시 등이다.

• 저자 정문기는 현재 성균관대학교 경영대학 회계학 전공 부교수로 재직 중이다. 성균관대학교 무역학과(경제학사)와 서울대학교 대학원 경영학과(경영학 석사)를 졸업하였으며, 성균관대학교 대학원에서 경영학 박사를 취득하였다. 삼일회계법인과 PwC New Jersey (USA)에서 약 30년간 공인회계사로서 회계실무를 수행하며 Partner(전무) 및 품질관리실장을 역임하였고, 금융감독원 회계심의위원회 위원, 한국공인회계사회 감사·인증기준위원회 위원, 한국회계학회 부회장 등을 역임하였다. 주요연구분야는 회계감사, 재무회계, 세무회계 등이다.